Weber A fractures are a sub-group of ankle fractures parallel or distal to the joint line, below the level of the syndesmosis. Most stable Weber A fractures are managed conservatively with no significant difference in outcome vs. surgical intervention.^1,2In an effort to ensure staff time was being used as efficiently as possible, a consultant-led virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was introduced to manage Weber A fractures. Patients not requiring immediate surgery were reviewed remotely and, wherever possible, were ‘virtually discharged’ to a nurse-led telephone line. Those with diagnostic uncertainty, unusual features or delayed recovery received a face to face review from a nurse or surgeon.

To examine how patients were allocated under this protocol, along with overall patient satisfaction and functional outcome.

An audit of satisfaction and outcome was performed of all patients who presented with a Weber A fracture to the ED between October 2011 and October 2012. The minimum follow-up period was two years. A satisfaction and patient reported outcome (5-level-likert-scale, EQ-5D, MOXFQ) measure was conducted via telephone.^3,4After exclusions, 79 patients were left, of which 63 were successfully contacted (80%).

Of the 79 patients included, 33 (42%) required early face-to-face review while 46 (58%) were discharged with advice following discussion at the VFC. Of the 63 successfully contacted, receipt of the information leaflet was recalled by 61 (97%) and 54 (86%) were satisfied with the information they had received. There was no difference in patient satisfaction regarding recovery (p=0.079) or treatment information (p=0.236) provided between avulsion and transverse fractures or in functional outcome according to MOXFQ (p=0.626) or EQ-Vas (p=0.915) scores.

Patient satisfaction can remain high without face-to-face consultations following injury. This was demonstrated by the high satisfaction with recovery (83%) and with information provided (86%) and is consistent with current published literature and similar to what would have been achieved with traditional fracture clinic review.⁵The new protocol reduces unnecessary hospital attendances for patients and reduces the burden of unnecessary review in orthopaedic departments. Only 15% of patients required review at a traditional fracture clinic and 27% at a nurse-led clinic, freeing resources for more complex cases.

There is substantial concern about the state of musculoskeletal knowledge of junior doctors. There are also marked differences in the locomotor curricula of medical schools, raising the possibility that students may be selectively disadvantaged from gaining appropriate knowledge and/or attaining a musculoskeletal career path. The aims of this study were to assess the musculoskeletal knowledge of newly qualified doctors in the south of Scotland, and to compare this between the two medical schools (Glasgow and Edinburgh) that have different locomotor teaching programmes.

All final year medical students, from Glasgow and Edinburgh Universities (n=158 and 221, respectively), attending the compulsory ‘Preparation for Practice’ lecture course immediately after (Glasgow) or before (Edinburgh) final exams, were assessed by the Freedman and Bernstein musculoskeletal examination, previously validated with two different pass-standards: (i) 73.1% (by orthopaedic surgeons), and (ii) 70% (by physicians).

There was a significant difference (Wilcoxon two sample test; p<0.5×10⁻⁹) in the marks obtained at the two institutions, the median being 59% (IQR 50–67%) and 68% (IQR 60–76%) at Glasgow and Edinburgh respectively. The pass-rates for the two institutions (Glasgow vs. Edinburgh) were markedly different, being 17.1% vs. 32.6% for the higher pass-mark, and 21.5% vs. 48% for the lower.

The majority of newly qualified doctors in the south of Scotland have inadequate musculoskeletal knowledge. There is a substantial and statistically significant difference in the scores attained by students from two neighbouring medical schools (Glasgow and Edinburgh). The striking difference in the pass-rates can be best explained by differences in respective musculoskeletal courses. These explicit and comparative deficits raise substantial questions for musculoskeletal curriculum planning, teaching, assessment and quality assurance.

Obtaining informed consent for an operation is a fundamental daily interaction between orthopaedic surgeon and patient. It is based on a patient's capacity to understand and retain information about the proposed procedure, the potential consequences of having it and the alternative options available. We used validated tests of memory on 59 patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty to assess how well they learned and recalled information about their planned procedure. All patients showed an ability to learn new material, however, younger age and higher educational achievement correlated with better performance. These results have serious implications for orthopaedic surgeons discussing planned procedures. They identify groups of patients who may require enhanced methods of communicating the objectives, risks and alternatives to surgery. Further research is necessary to assess interventions to improve communication prior to surgery.