Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 27 - 27
1 Apr 2018
Yoon P Kim C Park J Chang J Jeong M
Full Access

Introduction

Acetabular dysplasia cause hip joint osteoarthritis(OA) by change hip mechanism. However, to our best knowledge, no studies have been published using prospectively collected data from asymptomatic young age volunteers, precise radiographic method. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of hip dysplasia in asymptomatic Korean population as one of the most important risk factor of hip OA.

Materials & Methods

From December 2014 to March 2015, we investigated prospectively collected retrospectively reviewed data of 200 asymptomatic volunteers 400 hips in age between 18 and 50 years recruited from our institution. Pelvic radiographs were taken and all radiographs were reviewed by 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons. Lateral center-edge angle(LCEA), Sharp angle, Tonnis angle and acetabular width-depth ratio were measured. We analyzed the statistical differences of these values between sex by Mann-Whitney U test and independent t-test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to measure the relationship between dysplasia parameters.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 114 - 114
1 May 2016
Park Y Moon Y Lim S Kim S Jeong M Park S
Full Access

Introduction

As the proximal femoral bone is generally compromised in failed total hip arthroplasty, achievement of solid fixation with a new component can be technically demanding. Clinical studies have demonstrated good medium-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty using modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stems, but, to our knowledge, long-term outcomes have been rarely reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the minimum ten-year results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stem.

Materials & Methods

We analyzed 40 revision THAs performed in using a modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stem (Fig. 1) between December 1998 and February 2004. There were 11 men (12 hips) and 28 women (28 hips) with a mean age of 59 years (range, 38 to 79 years) at the time of revision THA. According to the Paprosky classification of femoral defects, 5 were Type II, 24 were Type IIIA, and 11 were Type IIIB. An extended trochanteric osteotomy was carried out in 21 (52%) of the 40 hips. Patients were followed for a mean of 11.7 years (range, 10 to 15 years).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 115 - 115
1 May 2016
Park Y Moon Y Lim S Kim S Jeong M Park S
Full Access

Introduction

Patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head are typically younger, more active, and often require high rates of revision following primary total hip arthroplasty. However, outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty in this patient population have been rarely reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the intermediate-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Materials & Methods

Between November 1994 and December 2009, 187 revision hip arthoplasty were performed in 137 patients who had a diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Exclusion criteria included infection, recurrent instability, isolated polyethylene liner exchange, and inadequate follow-up (less than 3 years). The final study cohort of this retrospective review consisted of 72 patients (75 hips) with a mean age of 53.3 years (range, 34 to 76). Components used for the acetabular revision included a cementless porous-coated cup in 58 hips and an acetabular cage in 2 hips. Components used for the femoral revision included a fully grit-blasted tapered stem in 30 hips and a proximally porous-coated modular stem in 9 hips. The mean duration of follow-up was 7 years (range, 3 to 17).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 112 - 112
1 May 2016
Park Y Moon Y Lim S Kim S Jeong M Park S
Full Access

Introduction

Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene due to their low wear and minimal particle production. However, ceramic-on-ceramic implants have been associated with ceramic fracture and squeaking. To address these issues, large ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced although limited data are available on their clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report the midterm results of primary total hip arthroplasty using a 32mm with a titanium-alloy sleeve.

Materials & Methods

We reviewed 245 patients who had 274 total hip arthroplasties with a 32 mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve and had been followed for more than 5 years (average, 6.5 years; range, 5–9 years). The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55.1 years (range, 16–82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina (Fig. 1). We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips, and presence of osteolysis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 113 - 113
1 May 2016
Park Y Moon Y Lim S Kim S Jeong M Park S
Full Access

Introduction

Highly cross-linked polyethylene has been introduced to decrease osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear debris generation, but there are few long-term data on revision total hip arthroplasty using highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. The purpose of this study was to report the long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Materials & Methods

We analyzed 63 revision total hip arthoplasties that were performed in 63 patients using a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner between April 2000 and February 2005. Of these, nine died and four were lost to follow-up before the end of the 10-year evaluation. Thus, the final study cohort consisted of 50 patients (50 hips). There were 26 males and 24 females with a mean age at time of revision total hip arthoplasty of 53 years (range, 27–75 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 11 years (range, 10–14 years).