In an effort to provide a TKA bearing material that balances resistance to wear, mechanical failure and oxidation, manufacturers introduced antioxidant polyethylene. In many designs, this is accomplished through pre-blending the polymer with the antioxidant before consolidation and radiation crosslinking. This study reports the wear performance (in terms of thickness change) of a hindered phenol (PBHP) UHMWPE from analysis of an early series of knee retrievals and explores these questions: 1) What is early-time performance of this new bearing material? 2) Is there a difference in performance between fixed and mobile bearings in this design? 3) How does quantitative surface analysis help understand performance at the insert-tray modular interface? A series of 100 consecutive Attune™ knee inserts (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) received at revision by an IRB approved retrieval laboratory between September 2014 and March 2019 were investigated. In vivo duration was 0–52 months. Both the fixed bearing design (n=74) and the rotating platform mobile bearing design (n=26) were included. Dimensional change was determined by measurement of each insert and compared to the as-manufactured dimensions, provided by the manufacturer. The insert-tray interfaces under the loaded bearing zones were analyzed with light interferometry using an optical surface profiler (NewView™ 7300, Zygo, Middlefield, CT). Statistical analyses to explore relationships between measured variables were conducted using SPSS.Introduction
Methods
In vivo, UHMWPE bearing surfaces are subject to wear and oxidation that can lead to bearing fatigue or fracture. A prior study in our laboratory of early antioxidant (AO) polyethylene retrievals, compared to gamma-sterilized and highly cross-linked (HXL) retrievals, showed them to be more effective at preventing in vivo oxidation. The current analysis expands that early study, addressing the effect of:
manufacturing-variables on as-manufactured UHMWPE; in vivo time on these initial properties; identifying important factors in selecting UHMWPE for the hip or knee. After our prior report, our IRB-approved retrieval laboratory received an additional 96 consecutive AO-retrievals (19 hips, 77 knees: in vivo time 0–6.7 years) of three currently-marketed AO-polyethylenes. These retrievals represented two different antioxidants (Vitamin E and Covernox) and two different delivery methods: blending-prior-to and diffusing-after irradiation cross-linking. Consecutive HXL acetabular and tibial inserts, received at retrieval, with in vivo time of 0–6.7 years (260 remelted, 170 annealed) were used for comparison with AO-retrievals. All retrievals were analyzed for oxidation and trans-vinylene index (TVI) using a Thermo-Scientific iN10 FTIR microscope. Mechanical properties were evaluated for 35 tibial inserts by uniaxial tensile testing using an INSTRON load frame. Cross-link density (n=289) was measured using a previously published gravimetric gel swell technique. Oxidation was reported as maximum ketone oxidation index (KOI) measured for each bearing. TVI was reported as the average of all scans for each material. Cross-link density and mechanical properties were evaluated as a function of both TVI and oxidation.Introduction
Methods
