Introduction: One of the problems of high tibial valgus osteotomy is the loss of achieved correction, which, in turn, is associated with the deterioration of the patient’s symptoms.

Aim: The aim of the present retrospective study is the correlation of certain parameters of axial alignment of the knee joint with the possibility of varus recurrence, after high tibial osteotomy, with stable fixation.

Material – Method: For this purpose we studied 33 patients (37 knees), that had undergone high tibial osteotomy between 1989 and 1997. All the above patients had a follow up of at least 2 years, with a mean of 35 months. The axial parameters that were studied were the femoral condyle-femoral shaft angle, the tibial plateau-tibial shaft angle, the post operative valgus correction and the post operative medial joint space widening.

Results: Loss of femorotibial angle equal to or more than 3 degrees was regarded as recurrence. This was observed in 9 knees (24%). The possibility of recurrence was strongly associated (Logistic Regression Analysis), on the one hand, with a post operative valgus correction of less than 6 degrees, and, on the other hand, with a femoral condyle-femoral shaft angle of more than 84 degrees (varus orientation of the articular surface of femoral condyles).

Conclusion: It seems that both undercorrection of the femorotibial angle and varus orientation of the femoral condyles in the frontal plane do not allow the shift of the weight bearing axis of the lower extremity towards the lateral compartment and, thus, constitute risk factors for recurrence of the varus deformity.

Introduction: Heterotopic ossification around the tip of intramedullary nail is a well-known complication of the nailing technique, since the time of Kuntscher. Nevertheless, little attention has been given to it in the current literature.

Aim: The evaluation of the incidence, clinical significance and possible risk factors of this complication after intramedullary nailing of femur with reaming.

Material – Method: For this purpose we studied the X-rays and medical charts of 30 patients who had undergone the above procedure at the Orthopaedic Departments of both Institutions mentioned above, between 2000 and 2002. The preoperative diagnoses were diaphyseal fracture: 13 patients, subtrochanteric fracture: 7 patients, refracture of femur: 1 patient, non-union: 5 patients, imminent fracture (due to intraosseous lesion): 2 patients, failure of previous fixation: 2 patients. In 18 cases the G.K. nail was used, whereas, in the remaining twelve, the long gamma nail was used. The patients’ follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 months (mean: 11 months). The presence of heterotopic bone around the proximal tip of the nail was graded according to the grading system of Brumback et al.

Results: In 12 patients (40%) there was no development of heterotopic bone around the proximal tip of the nail. In 14 patients (47%) minimal and moderate grade of heterotopic ossification was developed (grade I and II). Finally, in 4 patients (13%) there was significant heterotopic bone formation (grade III). None of the above patients presented with any significant limitation of ipsilateral hip joint motion. There was no correlation between type of fracture, type of nail fixation, presence of concomitant injuries, nail prominence above the tip of greater trochanter and the formation of heterotopic bone. The only positive correlation was between male sex and the presence of heterotopic ossification.

Conclusion: Heterotopic ossification of minimal and moderate grade is a common complication of the technique of intramedullary nailing of femur, without any further clinical significance. The formation of heterotopic bone of significant degree in the hip region, though it does not results in serious clinical problems for the patient, it will surely make future extraction of the nail difficult.