Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was primarily considered a successful procedure, several new knee implants were introduced in recent years that seek to obtain improved stability and higher flexion. One of the implant, Vanguard XPTM BiCruciate retaining (BCR), Zinmmer-Biomet, USA recreates a specific kinematic model through the principle of normal joint. An unselected consecutive series of sixty-two patients undergoing primary TKA using the cemented total knee system between August 2016 and April 2018 were studied. Twenty-seven knees was operated using Vanguard XP, subsequently thirty-five knees were received a TKA using cruciate retaining cemented total knee system FINETMCR, Nakashimamedical, Japan. Postoperatively standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained, from which the lower extremity mechanical axis, component angle were measured. The alignment goals were a neutral mechanical axis defined as a hip-to-ankle angle of 0°with the femoral and tibial components aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The total operating time were quantified utilising an operating room database. The total operating time between TKAs performed with Vanguard XP BCR and those performed with FINE CR was compared in each group. All patients postoperatively was evaluated of clinical results the Japan Orthopedics Association(JOA) Knee scores. We evaluated femoral component posterior offset (PFCO) in both of two group. The maximal protrusion of the posterior condyle, posteriorly to the extension line parallel to the tibial shaft from the edge of the posterior tibial component was measured on true lateral radiographs.Background
Patients and Method
Variability in component alignment continues to be a major in total knee arthroplasty(TKA). In the long term, coronal plane malalignment has been associated with an increased risk of loosening, insatability, and wear. Recently portable navigation system(PNS) in TKA have been introduced. The goal of PNS are to improve the accuracy of post operative alignment and eliminate outlier cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical results and quantify the coronal plane alignment between a group of patients who underwent TKA using PNS versus CT-free large-console navigation system. An unselected consecutive series of ninety-four patients undergoing primary TKA using the cruciate retaining cemented total knee system between April 2012 and August 2015 were studied. Patients were included only if they were deemed to be candidates for a Cruciate retaining TKA. Patients were excluded if they had a flexion contracture greater than 40°, or severe valgus or varus deformity. Forty eight knees was operated a TKA with CT-free large-console navigation system(The OrthoPilot system; Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Subsequently forty six knees was received a TKA using portable navigation system (KneeAlign2TM). Postoperatively standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained, from which the lower extremity mechanical axis, component angle were measured. The alignment goals were a neutral mechanical axis defined as a hip-to-ankle angle of 0°with the femoral and tibial components aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The total operating time were quantified utilising an operating room database. The total operating time between TKAs performed with CT-free navigation system and those performed with portable navigation system was compared in each group. All patients postoperatively was evaluated of clinical results the Japan Orthopedics Association(JOA) Knee scores.Background
Patients and Method
Patient matched instrumentation (PMI) have been proposed the accuracy of bone cuts through custom cutting blocks and provide the proper alignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). On the other hand, there are some reports that the introduction of PMI for guiding bone cuts could increase the incidence of malalignment in primary TKA. Recent comparisons between patient-specific cutting guides and quantitative assessments of postoperative alignment have revealed the presence of outliers with respect to coronal alignment. The purpose of this study was to assess the implanted component alignment post-operatively between one type of MRI based PMI (Visionaire; Smith & Nephew, Inc, Memphis, Tenn) and conventional surgical instrumentation (CI) using radiographs and CT scan. 32 knees in 32 patients (25 women) with medial type knee osteoarthritis were underwent cruciate retaining TKA between September 2013 and May 2015, and were included in this study. Preoperative MRI scanning of the hip, knee, and ankle was performed for PMI group (n=12) and CT scanning was performed for CI group (n=20) 6 weeks before surgery according to a standard scanning protocol to determine the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA). Postoperatively, we compared operation time, blood loss, and mechanical alignment of two groups. Post-surgical mechanical alignments such as hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), frontal femoral component angle (FFC), and frontal tibial component angle (FTC) were determined using long leg radiographs (Fig. 1). CT scans were used to assess the condylar twist angle (CTA) made by SEA and posterior condylar axis (Fig. 2). Each measurement was performed by two, blinded independent observers, and interclass correlation for each measurement was calculated. A student's two-tailed t test was used to compare the two cohorts, with statistical significance set at a p-value of <0.05.Introduction
Methods
Variability in component alignment continues to be a major in total knee arthroplasty(TKA). In the long term, coronal plane malalignment has been associated with an increased risk of loosening, insatability, and wear. Recently, patient specific guide in total knee arthroplasty have been introduced, in which preoperative 3-dementional imaging is used to manufacture disposable cutting guide specific to a patient's anatomy. The goals of patient specific guide are to improve the accuracy of post operative alignment and eliminate outlier cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical results and quantify the coronal plane alignment between a group of patients who underwent TKA using patient specific guide versus standard instrumentation. Patients and Method: An unselected consecutive series of seventy patients undergoing primary TKA using the same cruciate retaining cemented total knee system (VanuardTM, Biomet, Inc, warsaw, Indiana USA) between April 2010 and September 2013 were studied. Patients were included only if they were deemed to be candidates for a Cruciate retaining TKA. Patients were excluded if they had a flexion contracture greater than 40°, or severe valgus or varus deformity. Forty-nine knees was operated a TKA with standard instrumentation method. Subsequently twenty-one knees was received a TKA using CT-based patient specific guide(SignatureTM). Postoperatively standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained, from which the lower extremity mechanical axis, component angle were measured. The alignment goals were a neutral mechanical axis defined as a hip-to-ankle angle of 0°with the femoral and tibial components aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The total operating time were quantified utilising an operating room database. The total operating time between TKAs performed with standard instrumentation and those performed with patient specific guides was compared in each group. All patients postoperatively was evaluated of clinical results the Japan Orthopedics Association(JOA) Knee scores. Postoperative blood loss volume and postoperative concentrations of D-dimer were also measured. The mechanical axis angle in patient specific guide group was 1.8°, while the standard instrumentation group was 3.4°and there was no statistical significance. The number of outliers for mechanical axis angle was virtually identical between patient specific guide group 29.0% and the standard group 38.8%. The components angle between the two groups did not achieve statistical significance. The operative time in patient specific guide was 117.4 minutes and significantly less compared to the time of standard group 130.4 minutes. The JOA Knee score of standard instrumentation group was 80.8 points, and the score of patient specific guides group was 85.7 points. There was no statistical significance between the two groups on the clinical score. The blood loss volume of between the two group was no different substantially. The postoperative concentrations of D-dimer of patient specific guide group was 5.3(μg/ml), more less significantly than standard group 9.2 (μg/ml).Background
Results
