Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 80 - 80
7 Aug 2023
Liu A Qian K Dorzi R Alabdullah M Anand S Maher N Kingsbury S Conaghan P Xie S
Full Access

Abstract

Introduction

Knee braces are limited to providing passive support. There is currently no brace available providing both continuous monitoring and active robot-assisted movements of the knee joint. This project aimed to develop a wearable intelligent motorised robotic knee brace to support and monitor rehabilitation for a range of knee conditions including post-surgical rehabilitation. This brace can be used at home providing ambulatory continuous passive movement obviating the need for hospital admissions.

Methodology

A wearable sensing system monitoring knee range of motion was developed to provide remote feedback to clinicians and real-time guidance for patients. A prototype of an exoskeleton providing dynamic motion assistance was developed to help patients complete their exercise goals and strengthen their muscles. The accuracy and reliability of those functions were validated in human participants during exercises including knee flexion/extension (FE) in bed and in chair, sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 13 - 13
1 Jul 2020
Stone M Smith L Kingsbury S Czoski-Murray C Judge A Pinedo-Villanueva R West R Wright J Smith C Arden N Conaghan P
Full Access

Follow-up of arthroplasty varies widely across the UK. The aim of this NIHR-funded study was to employ a mixed-methods approach to examine the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up and produce evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations. It has been supported by BHS, BASK, BOA, ODEP and NJR.

Four interconnected work packages have recently been completed: (1) a systematic literature review; (2a) analysis of routinely collected National Health Service data from four national data sets to understand when and which patients present for revision surgery; (2b) prospective data regarding how patients currently present for revision surgery; (3) economic modelling to simulate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with different follow-up care models and (4) a Delphi-consensus process, involving all stakeholders, to develop a policy document to guide appropriate follow-up care after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

We will present the following Recommendations:

For ODEP10A∗ minimum implants, it is safe to disinvest in routine follow-up from 1 to 10 years post non-complex hip and knee replacement provided there is rapid access to orthopaedic review

For ODEP10A∗ minimum implants in complex cases, or non-ODEP10A∗ minimum implants, periodic follow-up post hip and knee replacement may be required from 1 to 10 years

At 10 years post hip and knee replacement, we recommend clinical, which may be virtual, and radiographic evaluation

After 10 years post hip and knee replacement, frequency of further follow-up should be based on the 10-year assessment; ongoing rapid access to orthopaedic review is still required

Overarching statements

These recommendations apply to post primary hip and knee replacement follow-up

The 10-year time point in these recommendations is based on a lack of robust evidence beyond ten years

The term complex cases refer to individual patient and surgical factors that may increase the risk for replacement failure