The study compared thigh-shank and shank-foot coordination during gait before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with controls (CTRL).

Twenty-seven patients (male=15/female=12; age=63.2±6.9 years) were evaluated one month prior to and twelve months after surgery, and compared to 27 controls (male=14/female=13; age=62.2±4.3). The participants were outfitted with a full-body marker set. Gait speed (normalized by leg length) was calculated. The time series of the thigh, shank, and foot orientation in relation to the laboratory coordinate system were extracted. The coordination between the thigh-shank and shank-foot in the sagittal plane were calculated using a vector coding technique. The coupling angles were categorized into four coordination patterns. The stance phase was divided into thirds: early, mid, and late stance. The frequency of each pattern and gait speed were compared using a one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Bonferroni correction.

Walking speed and shank-foot coordination showed no differences between the groups. The thigh-shank showed differences. The pre-TKA group showed a more in-phase pattern compared to the CTRL group during early-stance. During mid-stance, the pre- and post-TKA presented a more in-phase pattern compared to the CTRL group. Regarding shank-foot coordination, the groups presented an in-phase and shank pattern, with more shank phase during mid-stance and more in-phase during late-stance.

The pre-TKA group showed greater differences than the post-TKA compared to the controls. The more in-phase pattern in the pre- and post-TKA groups could relate to a reduced capacity for the thigh that leads the movement. During mid-stance in normal gait, the knee is extending, where the thigh and shank movements are in opposite directions. The in-phase results in the TKA groups indicate knee stiffness during the stance phase, which may relate to a muscular deficit or a gait strategy to reduce joint stress.

This study examined pre-operative measures to predict post-operative biomechanical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.

Twenty-eight patients (female=12/male=16, age=63.6±6.9, BMI=29.9±7.4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo TKA were included. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (GD) with a subvastus approach. Patients visited the gait lab within one-month prior to surgery and 12 months following surgery. At the gait lab, patients completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), a timed up and go (TUG), maximum knee flexion and extension strength evaluation, and a walking task. Variables of interest included the five KOOS sub-scores, TUG time, maximum knee flexion and extension strength normalized to body weight, walking speed, and peak knee biomechanics variables (flexion angle, abduction moment, power absorption). A Pearson's correlation was used to identify significantly correlated variables which were then inputted into a multiple regression.

No assumption violations for the multiple regression existed for any variables. Pre-operative knee flexion and extension strength, TUG time, and age were used in the multiple regression. The multiple regression model statistically significantly predicted peak knee abduction moment, post-operative walking speed, and post-operative knee flexion strength. All four variables added statistically significantly to the prediction p<.05.

Pre-operative KOOS values did not correlate with any biomechanical indicators of post-operative success. Age, pre-operative knee flexion and extension strength, and TUG times predicted peak knee abduction moment, which is associated with medial knee joint loading. These findings stress the importance of pre-surgery condition, as stronger individuals achieved better post-operative biomechanical outcomes. Additionally, younger patients had better outcomes, suggesting that surgeons should not delay surgery in younger patients. This delay in surgery may prevent patients from achieving optimal outcomes. Future studies should utilize a hierarchical multiple regression to identify which variables are most predictive.

Introduction and Objective

Gait variability is the amplitude of the fluctuations in the time series with respect to the mean of kinematic (e.g., joint angles) or kinetic (e.g., joint moments) measurements. Although gait variability increases with normal ageing or pathological mechanisms, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose was to determine if a patient who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can reduce gait variability.

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause for athletic hip injury and early hip osteoarthritis. Although corrective cam FAI surgery can improve patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), it is not clear how surgery affects muscle forces and hip joint loading. Surgery for FAI may redistribute muscle forces and contact forces at the hip joint during routine activities. The purpose of this study was to examine the muscle contributions and hip contact forces during gait in patients prior and after two years of undergoing surgery for cam FAI. Kinematics and kinetics were recorded in 11 patients with symptomatic cam FAI as they completed a gait task. Muscle and hip contact forces during the stance phase were estimated using musculoskeletal modelling and static optimization in OpenSim. All patients reported improvements in PROMs. Post-operatively, patients showed reduced forces in the long head of the biceps femoris at ipsilateral foot-strike and in the rectus femoris at the contralateral foot-strike. The reduced muscle forces decreased sagittal hip moment but did not change hip contact forces. This was the first study to evaluate hip muscle and contact forces in FAI patients post-operatively. Although hip contact forces are not altered following surgery, muscle forces are decreased even after two years. These findings can provide guidance in optimizing recovery protocols after FAI surgery to improve hip flexor and extensor muscle forces.

Dual mobility (DM) bearing implants reduce the incidence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and as such they are used for the treatment of hip instability in both primary and revision cases. The aim of this study was to compare lower limb muscle activity of patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a dual mobility (DM) or a common cup (CC) bearing compared to healthy controls (CON) during a sit to stand task.

A total of 21 patients (12 DM, 9 CC) and 12 CON were recruited from the local Hospital. The patients who volunteered for the study were randomly assigned to either a DM or a CC cementless THA after receiving informed consent. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon using the direct anterior approach. Participants underwent electromyography (EMG) and motion analysis while completing a sit-to-stand task. Portable wireless surface EMG probes were placed on the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, semitendinosus (ST), gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae muscles of the affected limb in the surgical groups and the dominant limb in the CON group. Motion capture was used to record lower limb kinematics and kinetics. Muscle strength was recorded using a hand-held dynamometer during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) testing. Peak linear envelope (peakLE) and total muscle activity (iEMG) were extrapolated and normalized to the MVIC and time cycle for the sit to stand task. Using iEMG, quadriceps-hamstrings muscle co-activation index was calculated for the task. Nonparametric Kruskal Wallace ANOVA tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify where significant (p < 0.05) differences occurred.

The DM group had greater iEMG of the ST muscle compared to the CC (p=0.045) and the CON (p=0.015) groups. The CC group had lower iEMG for hamstring muscles compared to the DM (p=0.041) group. The DM group showed lower quadriceps-hamstrings co-activation index compared to the CON group and it approached significance (p=0.054). The CC group had greater anterior pelvis tilt compared to both DM (p=0.043) and the CON (p=0.047) groups. The DM also had larger knee varus angles and less knee internal rotation compared to both groups, however this never reached significance. No significant differences in muscle strength existed between the groups.

Higher ST muscle activity in the DM group is explained by the reduction in internal rotation at the knee joint as the ST muscle was more active to resist the varus forces during the sit-to-stand task. Reduced quadriceps activity in the CC group is explained by increased pelvic anterior tilt as this would shorten the moment arm and muscle length in the quadriceps, ultimately reducing quadriceps muscle activity. The reduced co-activation between quadriceps and hamstrings activity in the DM group compared to the CC and CON groups is related to better hip function and stability. Combining lower co-activation and larger range of motion for the DM group without impingement, this implant seems to offer better prevention against THA subluxation and less wear of the implant.