We aimed to review the outcome of Agility total ankle replacements carried out in our institution between 2002 and 2006. Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological review pre-operatively, then at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months, and annually until 10 years post op. Clinical review included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score, satisfaction and pain scores. Case notes were reviewed to determine intra and post-operative complications. 30 arthroplasties were performed in 30 consecutive patients. Pre-operative diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis(16), primary osteoarthritis(12) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis(2). After a mean follow up of 6.2 years (1.4–10.1), 4 patients had died, and 22 out of the remaining 24 were available for follow-up. Intra operative complications included lateral malleoli fracture(3) and superficial peroneal nerve injury(2). Post operative complications included 1 early death, but this was not related to the surgical procedure. Two patients developed deep infections of the prosthesis. One underwent removal of the implant; the other is on long term oral antibiotic therapy. One patient had delayed union of the syndesmosis and six patients had non-union. On clinical assessment, patients' AOFAS scores improved from mean 40.4 pre-op to 83.5 post-op (p< 0.001). Radiological assessment of the tibial component revealed 25 (93%) patients had lucency in at least one zone in the AP radiograph. We found a relatively high level of re-surgery and complications following Agility total ankle replacement. A 7% revision rate is much higher than would be tolerated in knee or hip arthroplasty, but compares favourably to other studies of TAR. Despite radiological features which suggest loosening, the high rate of re-surgery and complications; patients are generally satisfied with the procedure, reporting lower levels of pain and improved function. Overall we feel that the Agility ankle is an acceptable alternative to ankle arthrodesis, however patients need to be warned of the risk of re-surgery.
Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is a common procedure particularly for posttraumatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Two surgical approaches are commonly used: the medial and the dorsal approach. It is recognized that access to the lateral aspect of the talonavicular joint can be limited when using the medial approach and it is our experience that using the dorsal approach addresses this issue. We performed an anatomical study using cadaver specimens, to compare the amount of articular surface that can be accessed, and therefore prepared for arthodesis, by each surgical approach. Medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint were performed on each of 11 cadaveric specimens (10 fresh frozen, 1 embalmed). Distraction of the joint was performed as used intraoperatively for preparation of articular surfaces during talonavicular arthrodesis. The accessible area of articular surface was marked for each of the two approaches using a previous reported technique. Disarticulation was performed and the marked surface area was quantified using an immersion digital microscribe, allowing a three dimensional virtual model of the articular surfaces to be assessed. The median percentage of accessible total talonavicular articular surface for the medial and dorsal approaches was 71% and 92% respectively. This difference was significant (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, p< 0.001). This study provides quantifiable measurements of the articular surface accessible by the medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint. These data support for the use of the dorsal approach for talonavicular arthrodesis.
