Patients with neurogenic claudication from lumbar canal stenosis non-responsive to non-surgical treatment are usually managed with spinal decompression with or without fusion. Flexion at stenotic segments relieves symptoms by increasing canal cross-sectional area, intervertebral foraminal height. Interspinous spacers work by causing flexion at the treated segement. We used COFLEX¯ [Paradigm Spine] a titanium interspinous spacer along with interlaminar decompression where indicated. To compare the clinical and radiological results of patients undergoing interlaminar decompression with or without use of COFLEX¯. Pre and post-operative assessment and comparison of clinical outcomes of Oswestry disability index(ODI), Visual analog Scale(VAS), Short Form-36(SF-36) and radiological outcomes of disc heights of operated and adjacent levels, intervertebral foraminal heights, sagittal angles of the operated segment. All consecutive patients undergoing spinal decompression at one or more levels from Jan to Dec 2008 were included. Patients with clinically symptomatic back pain for a duration longer than claudication pain were offered interspinous spacer at L4/5 level or above. In first group(n-20), patients were treated with inter-laminar decompression and COFLEX¯ with a standard posterior approach. In second group(n-25) inter-laminar decompression for the involved segment was performed. All patients are on follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared at 6 months and 1 year. Statistically significant(p<0.001) improvements in ODI, VAS(back), VAS(leg) and SF-36 in patients in whom COFLEX¯ was used. Radiological parameters also showed significant improvements(p<0.05). Use of COFLEX¯ spacer is justified in patients with symptomatic disc degeneration with neurogenic claudication when treated operatively.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the cornerstone investigation for cervical disc disease (CDD). However, MRI changes suggestive of CDD are found in people above forty, even in asymptomatic healthy individuals [1]. Mere presence of MRI changes of CDD does not exclude the presence of concomitant extra-foraminal pathology. No study design. We present here a series of three cases where use of ‘high resolution ultrasound’ has allowed accurate diagnosis of concomitant extra-foraminal pathology in patients with MRI-proven CDD. The three cases were acute neuropraxia of aberrant C5 nerve root, anterior interossous nerve compression due to pseudo-aneurysm of brachial artery and ‘acute brachial neuritis’ respectively. No outcome measure. Use of diagnostic high resolution ultrasound revealed accurate diagnosis of concomitant extra-foraminal pathology in all three cases. The cases with acute neuropraxia and acute brachial neuritis recovered with conservative treatment. Pseudo-aneurysm was treated successfully with surgery. High resolution ultrasound of the brachial plexus and peripheral nerves may be useful in following scenarios to identify an extra-foraminal pathology: (1) when symptoms and signs are out of proportion to the MRI findings of CDD; (2) when there is obvious discordance between MRI and nerve conduction findings; (3) where an entrapment neuropathy is suspected but the site of nerve lesion cannot be located.
