Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_21 | Pages 73 - 73
1 Dec 2016
Sheehan K Sobolev B Guy P Kuramoto L Morin S Sutherland J Beaupre L Griesdale D Dunbar M Bohm E Harvey E
Full Access

Hospital type is an indicator for structures and processes of care. The effect of hospital type on hip fracture in-hospital mortality is unknown. We determine whether hip fracture in-hospital mortality differs according to hospital type.

We retrieved records of hip fracture for 167,816 patients aged 65 years and older, who were admitted to a Canadian acute hospital between 2004 and 2012. For each hospital type we measured and compared the cumulative incidence of in-hospital death by in-patient day, accounting for discharge as a competing event.

The cumulative incidence of in-hospital death at in-patient day 30 was lowest for teaching hospital admissions (7.3%) and highest for small community hospital admissions (11.5%). The adjusted odds of in-hospital death were 12% (95% CI 1.06–1.19), 25% (95% CI 1.17–1.34), and 64% (95% CI 1.50–1.79) higher for large, medium, and small community hospital versus teaching hospital admissions. The adjusted odds of nonoperative death were 1.6 times (95% CI 1.42–1.86), and 3.4 times (95% CI 2.96–3.94) higher for medium and small community hospital versus teaching hospital admissions. The adjusted odds of postoperative death were 14% (95% CI 1.07–1.22) and 20% (95% CI 1.10–1.31) higher at large and medium community hospitals versus teaching hospitals. The adjusted odds of postoperative death were largest at small community hospitals but the confidence interval crossed 1 (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.92–1.70).

A higher proportion of hip fracture patients die at non-teaching compared to teaching hospitals accounting for length of stay. Higher mortality at small community hospitals may reflect disparities in access to resources and delay to treatment.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVIII | Pages 136 - 136
1 Sep 2012
Guy P Sobolev B Kuramoto L Lefaivre KA
Full Access

Purpose

The prevention of a subsequent, contralateral hip fracture is targeted as an avoidable event in the elderly. Fall prevention and bone strengthening measures have met with limited success and the urgency of their effect is undetermined. Our objective was to evaluate the time to second hip fracture (the time between a first and a subsequent, contralateral fracture) in elderly patients, using a population-based administrative health data set.

Method

The 58,286 records of persons older than 60 yrs and hospitalized for a hip fracture between 1985 and 2005 were obtained from a Provincial administrative health database. We excluded non-traumatic cases and identified the care episodes related to a subsequent hip fracture for each patient using unique identifiers. We used a 5 year “wash-out period” to avoid counting a second fracture as a first one.

We calculated the proportion of first and second fractures and sex distribution over time (fiscal years) and quantified the time between first and second fracture, while correlating it to age, sex and fracture type.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVIII | Pages 195 - 195
1 Sep 2012
Guy P Lefaivre KA Levy AR Sobolev B Cheng SY Kuramoto L
Full Access

Purpose

To determine whether there have been changes in the age, sex and subtype specific first hip fracture rates in Canadian province of British Columbia (BC) between 1990 and 2004.

Method

Records of all persons aged 60 years and older hospitalized with hip fractures in BC between 1985 and 2004 were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database. Only the first hip fracture records were included, and fractures likely due to causes other than trauma were excluded. Age- and sex-specific rates were calculated using population denominators from Statistics Canada and direct standardization was used. Age standardized rates allowed for comparison across years with adjustment for age distribution.