Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates such as Zoledronic Acid (ZA) are used clinically for the treatment of skeletal diseases related with increased bone resorption. The gold standard is to administrate the drug through a systemic pathway, however this is often associated with high dosages, risk of side-effects, reduced site-specific drug delivery and hence, limited drug-effectiveness. A controlled local drug delivery, via a biomimetic bone graft, could be beneficial by direct and time-regulated application of significantly lower drug dosage at the site of interest. Thus, higher efficacy and reduced side-effects could be expected. In this experimental in vivo study, we examined the effect of ZA when used together with a Calcium Sulphate/Hydroxyapatite biomaterial in a femoral condyle bone defect in rats and compared local to systemic administration. The following groups were used: group1: empty defect (no biomaterial & no treatment), group2: biomaterial alone, group3: biomaterial + systemic ZA (0.1mg ZA/kg – single subcutaneous injection), group4–6: biomaterial conjugated with ZA at different concentrations, (0.07 to 0.70 mg ZA/mL of paste, corresponding to 0.0024 to 0.024 mg ZA/kg). The animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks and toxicological examination was performed. Bone regeneration was evaluated using qualitative and quantitative micro-CT analysis and Histomorphometry. The results showed a significant difference between the groups, suggesting that ZA has an overall effect on bone healing. The most pronounced effect was seen with the local application of approximately 10 times less ZA-dosage when compared to systemic use (p<0.001). This study demonstrates the importance of local ZA administration in bone regeneration.

Aim

A gentamicin-eluting biocomposite consisting of hydroxyapatite (HA) and calcium sulphate (CaS)*1 can provide effective dead space management and bone formation in chronic osteomyelitis. However, radiographic follow-up after implantation of this biomaterial has shown imaging features previously not described with other comparable bone graft substitutes. Last year we presented preliminary results with a follow-up of 6 months. Now we present the radiographic, µCT and histological one-year follow-up of the critical-size bone defect model in sheep. The aim of this study was to simulate the clinical situation in a large animal model to correlate different imaging techniques used in the clinic (Radiography, CT and MRI scans) with histological finding.

Endoprosthetic reconstruction for pathologic acetabular fractures is associated with a high risk of periprosthetic joint infection. In this setting, bone defect reconstruction utilising co-delivery of a synthetic bone substitute with an antibiotic, is an attractive treatment option from both, therapeutic and prophylactic perspective. We wished to address some concerns that remain regarding the possible presence of potentially wear inducing particles in the periprosthetic joint space subsequent to this procedure.

We analysed a drain fluid sample from an endoprosthetic reconstruction of a pathologic acetabular fracture with implantation of a gentamicin eluting, biphasic bone graft substitute, consisting of 40% hydroxyapatite (HA) and 60% calcium sulphate (CERAMENT G), into the residual peri-acetabular bone defect. This sample was divided into two 1.5ml subsamples, to one of which 100mg HA particles were added as control before burning off all organic substance at very high temperature. These heat treated samples were then examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDAX) and compared to a reference sample consisting of HA particles only.

On SEM, hydroxyapatite particles were readily recognisable in the control and reference samples, whereas only very few particles over 2μm were apparent in the ”pure” drain sample. EDAX revealed that very large amounts of salts were present in both drainage samples. The pure drainage sample however, contained markedly lower amounts of calcium and phosphate compared to reference and control samples. No HA particles as such, were seen in the pure sample, however their presence cannot be excluded with absolute certainty, as some particles might have been hidden within the large salt conglomerates.

We could not find clear evidence that the drain fluid really contained HA particles. More thorough investigations are needed and future analyses with prior removal of the high salt content would likely yield more conclusive results.