Aims
The purpose of the study was to investigate whether closed intramedullary
(IM) nailing with percutaneous cement augmentation is better than
conventional closed nailing at relieving pain and suppressing tumours
in patients with metastases of the femur and humerus.
Patients and Methods
A total of 43 patients (27 men, 16 women, mean age 63.7 years,
standard deviation (sd) 12.2; 21 to 84) underwent closed
IM nailing with cement augmentation for long bone metastases. A
further 27 patients, who underwent conventional closed IM nailing,
served as controls. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale
(VAS) score pre-operatively (pre-operative VAS), one week post-operatively
(immediate post-operative VAS), and at six weeks post-operatively
(follow-up post-operative VAS). Progression of the tumour was evaluated
in subgroups of patients using F-18-fludeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron
emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and/or bone scintigraphy
(BS), at a mean of 8.8 and 7.2 months post-operatively, respectively.
