The recognition of the role of TFCC as a major distal radioulnar joint stabilizer and a buffer to compressive forces indicates the importance of preserving as much of this structure as possible. We developed arthroscopic technique for repair of Palmer I B tears of TFCC using a hypodermic needle which obviates the need of any additional skin incision. With wrist under traction important landmarks like radial styloid process, ulnar styloid process, Lister's tubercle and extensor tendons are marked using skin marker. For placement of the arthroscope, 3–4 portal is used and for instruments 6 R and 6 U portals are used. An outside-in technique is used. A 19 G needle is inserted upward from 5mm proximal to the level of the 6 R portal through skin, subcutaneous tissue, capsular tissue and then through the 2mm inner side of detached area of TFCC, while stabilizing it with probe. A 2–0 polydioxanone-PDS suture is passed through needle and caught by grasper placed in the 6 R portal. Now needle is withdrawn and then suture is retrieved out of the joint through the 6 R portal. The procedure is repeated for required number of sutures for dorsal part of peripheral tear. Thus we have stitches with one limb exiting the joint through portal and the other limb entering the joint percutaneously. A small mosquito forceps is passed through the 6 R portal undermining subcutaneous area and these percutaneously passing limbs of sutures are withdrawn through the portal. Now we have sutures entering and exiting through the 6 R portal. Similar procedure is done for ulnar part of peripheral tear through the 6 U portal. Knots are tied and slid beneath the subcutaneous tissue. It offers advantages of a lower risk of neurovascular damage, reduced postoperative pain, faster rehabilitation and better cosmesis
We hereby present results of controlled randomized trial of use of popliteal block for pain relief in ankle and hind foot surgery. We have studied 63 patients over period of 9 months. Patients who needed ankle or hind foot procedure were selected for trial. Patients were explained about the trial and popliteal block along with leaflets at preoperative clinics. Patients were randomized on the day of surgery. A sealed envelop stating whether patient will go to block group (A) or no block group (B) was opened in the anaesthetic room before the patient was anaesthetized. Patients were evaluated for subjective pain scores at 30 min, 6 hrs, 12 hrs and 24 hrs after surgery. Amount of anaelgesic required and time to first dose was documented. Popliteal blocks were given by one foot and ankle consultant and one trained fellow. The block was administered in lateral position at 0.8 mA stimulus to detect the nerve. The data was compared statistically between group A and B.Introduction
Materials and methods
