At a minimum 12 years follow-up the Authors performed a matched paired study between 2 groups: Bi-Unicompartimental (femoro-tibial) versus Total Knee Replacements, both navigated, they hypothesised that Bi-UKR guarantees a clinical score and patient satisfaction at least similar to TKR without differences in survivorship. 19 BI-UKR (1999–2003) were included in the study (group A). Every single patients in group A was matched to a computer-assisted TKR implanted in the same period (group B). The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Knee Society Score, the GIUM Score and the WOMAC Arthritis Index. Radiographically the HKA angle and the Frontal Tibial Component angle (FTC) were. Statistical analysis of the results was performed and Kaplan-Meir survival rate was assessed in both the groups.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether traditional morphometric parameters of the femur trochlear surface are dependable to classify the severity of the trochlear dysplasia. An automatic method to process the distal femur surface is proposed to determine anatomical landmarks and compute morphometric parameters, namely the trochlear depth(TD), the trochlear sulcus angle(SA), the lateral trochlear facet inclination(LFTI), the trochlear facet asymmetry ratio(TFAR) and the ratio between the two (lateral and medial) maximum antero-posterior sizes(CAR) routinately used to quantify trochlear dysplasia. Tests on 11 cadavers and 43 patients, affected by aspecific anterior knee pain, elucidate the role of the parameter cut-off values traditionally used in clinical practice.Purpose
Methods
Aim of this study is to assess any differences in digital templanting accuracy of a modular short femoral stems implanted with 2 different appoaches (direct anterior and posterolateral). From December 2012 to Jenaury 2014 100 patient undergoing to a THA using the same implant with a short femoral modular stem were prospectively included in the study and divided in 2 groups according to the surgical approach. All the patients underwent to the same preoperative radiological protocol and the digital templating. The digital templating results were compared with the truly inserted implant size and a statistical analysis was carried on.Introduction
Material and Methods
Aim of the study was to assess difficulties and adverse effects in more than 400 CAS hip replacements using a short modular femoral stem to assess their incidence and to determine if this surgical procedure has to be considered as an high demanding surgical technique. Since 1998, 511 computer assisted hip replacements using a short modular stem were performed in our department. 403 implants were followed for at least 6 months postoperatively and included in the study. All the cases were divided into 3 series according to when the surgery had been performed to consider the evolution of the navigation systems and the surgeons familiarity with this improvement (group A: 1998–2003, group B: 2004–2008 and group C: 2009–2014). All intra-operative problems (difficulties that required no operative intervention to resolve or without any conseguence on the navigation process), intra-operative obstacles (difficulties that required operative intervention or that caused a failure of the navigation process) and complications (intra-operative injuries and all the problems following in the first 6 months post-operatively) were registered. Adverse facts not directly caused by the surgical but derived by other conditions were excluded from the study.Purpose
Materials and Methods
Despite clear clinical advantages Unicompartimetal Knee Replacement still remain an high demanding and less forgiving surgical procedure. Different Authors in literature pointed out how malalignment increases the rate of aseptic failure even more than in TKR. Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed to improve implant positioning in joint replacement surgery with no need of intramedullary guide despite no still proven clinical advantages. Likewise more recently Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested, even in partial knee reconstruction, as a new technology capable of new advantages such as shorter surgical times and lower blood losses maintaining at least the same accuracy. Aim of the study is to present a prospective study comparing 2 groups of UKR s using either a computer assisted technique or a CT-based Patient Specific Instrumentation. Since January 2010, 54 patients undergoing UKR because medial compartment arthritis were enrolled in the study prospectively. Before surgery patients were alternatively assigned to either computer-assisted alignment (group A) or patient specific instrumentation group (group B). In the group A (27 knees) the implant (Sigma, Depuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) was positioned using a CT-free computer assisted alignment system specifically created for UKR surgery (OrthoKey, Delaware, USA). In group B (27 knees) the implant (GMK Uni, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) was performed using a CT-based PSI technology (MyKnee, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). In both the groups all the implants were cemented and using always a fixed metal backed tibial component. The surgical time and complications were documented in all cases. Six months post-operatively the patients underwent to the same radiological investigation to determine the frontal femoral component angle (FFC), the frontal tibial component angle (FTC), the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation (slope) of tibial/femoral components. The number and percentage of outliners for each parameter was determined. In addition the percentage of patients in each group with all 5 parameters within the desired range was calculated. Furthermore the 2 groups were clinically assessed using KSS and Functional scoreINTRODUCTION:
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Despite clear clinical advantages Unicompartimetal Knee Replacement (UKR) still remain a high demanding and less forgiving surgical procedure. Different Authors in literature pointed out how in coronal tibial malalignment beyond 3° as well as tibial slope beyond 7° increase the rate of aseptic failure. Likewise, overcorrection in the coronal plain is a well recognised cause of failure because of an overweighting on the controlateral compartment. Furthermore it has been shown how in UKR surgery even using short narrow intramedullary guide this can cause errors in both coronal planes. Computer assisted surgery has been proposed to improve implant positioning in joint replacement surgery with no need of intramedullary guide. Likewise more recently Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested as a new technology capable of new advantages such as shorter surgical times and lower blood losses maintaining at least the same accuracy. Aim of this prospective study is to present comparing 2 groups of UKRs using either a computer assisted technique or a CT based PSI. Since January 2010 54 patients undergoing UKR because of medial compartment arthritis were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery patients were alternatively assigned to either computer-assisted alignment (group A) or PSI group (group B). In the group A (27 knees) the implant (Sigma, Depuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) was positioned using a CT-free computer assisted alignment system specifically created for UKR surgery (OrthoKey, Delaware, USA USA). In group B (27knees) the implant (GMK uni, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) was performed using a CT-Based PSI technology (MyKnee, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). In both the groups all the implants were cemented and using always a fixed metal backed tibial component. The duration of surgery and all the complications according to Kim classification were documented in all cases. Six months after surgery each patient had long-leg standing anterior-posterior radiographs and lateral radiographs of the knee. The radiographs were assessed to determine the Frontal Femoral Component angle (FFC), the Frontal Tibial Component angle (FTC), the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation (slope) of both tibial and femoral component. The number and percentage of outliners for each parameter was determined. In addition the percentage of patients from each group with all 5 parameters within the desired range was calculated. Furthermore at the latest follow-up the 2 groups were clinically assessed using KSS and Functional score.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A preoperative planning for accurately predicting the size and alignment of the prosthetic components may allow to perform a precise, efficient and reproducible total knee replacement. The planning can be carried out using as a support digital radiographic images or CT images with three-dimensional reconstruction. Aim of this prospective study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of two different types of pre-operative planning, in determining the size of the femoral and tibial component in total knee arthroplasty performed with Patient Specific Instrument (PSI). The two compared techniques were: digital radiography and “CT-Based”. A prospective study was conducted to compare the accuracy in predicting the size of the prosthetic components in total knee replacement in 71 patients diagnosed with primary and symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Inclusion criteria was “Easy Knee”: BMI ≤ 35, varus/valgus deviation ≤15° and residual flexion of the knee ≥ 90°. Pre-operatively all the patients underwent to the same standard protocol including digital radiographs with calibration and a CT scan. A dedicated IMPAX digital software (Agfa-Gevaert, NV, USA) was used to template the radiographs. The CT-based planning was performed on 3D reconstruction of CT scans of 3 joints: hip, knee and ankle, as established in standardised protocol to build up patient specific cutting mask (MyKnee, Medacta, Castel S. Pietro, Switzerland). All the surgeries were performed by 2 senior Authors (M.A and N.C.) using the same implant and the definitive component sizes implanted were registered and compared with the sizes suggested by both planning techniques considering also the range of error. Results analysis was carried out using nonparametric tests.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Post traumatic arthritis of the knee can be a conseguence of distal femur fracture and retained hardware can complicate any further surgical option including arthroplasty. Both staged surgical procedures to remove before the hardware or simultaneous procedure of arthroplasty and removal of hardware have been indicated with an increased risk of complications. Aim of this study is to present a consecutive series of TKA following distal femur fracture using a computer assisted technique without the removal of retained hardware assessing both the efficacy of navigation in managing these complex cases as “routinary” primary arthroplasties. A consecutive series of 16 patients treated with a computer assisted TKR following femoral fracture and with retained hardware were included in the study (group A). The interval between the fracture and operation averaged 5.8 years (range 1–12 years), the retained hardwares was an intramedullary nail in 6 cases, distal lateral plates in 7 cases and screws in 4 cases. All patients in group A were matched with a patient who had undergone to a computer assisted TKR using the same implant and software because of atraumatic knee arthritis in the same period (group B). Patients were matched in terms of age, gender, pre-operative range of motion, pre-operative arthritis severity according to Albaack classification, type and grade of deformity and implant features (cruciate retaining or sacrificing). There were 10 male and 6 female for each group, the mean pre-operative age was 64.3 years (range: 54–72) for the group A and 65.4 years (range: 53–74) for the group B. The mean pre-operative flexion was 85.5 degrees (range: 65–115) and 88.1 degrees (range: 70–115) for the post traumatic group and the matched group respectively.Introduction
Material and Methods
