Revision total knee arthroplasty (revision TKA) occurs for a wide variety of indications and along with revision total hip arthroplasty is billed for using Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) 466, 467, and 468 in the United States. However, DRGs do not account for revision etiology, a potentially substantial driver of cost. This study investigates revision TKA costs and 30-day complications by indication, employing both local granular as well as national standardized databases. Hospitalization costs and complication rates for 1,422 aseptic revision TKAs performed at a high-volume center between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, charges for 28,173 revision TKAs in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were converted to costs using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project cost-to-charge ratios. 30-day complication rates for 3,450 revision TKAs were obtained using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP). Costs and complications were compared between revision TKAs performed for the indication of fracture, wear/loosening, and instability with use of simultaneous and pairwise comparisons and a multivariable model accounting for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, age, and sex.Introduction
Methods
Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be performed under a single-anesthetic (SA) or staged under a two-anesthetic (TA) technique. Recently, our institution began piloting a two-surgeon team SA method for bilateral TKA. The purpose of this study was to compare the inpatient costs and clinical outcomes in the first 90 days after surgery between the team SA, single-surgeon SA, and single-surgeon TA approaches for bilateral TKA. All primary TKA performed from 2007–2017 by the two participating surgeons for each of the 3 groups of interest were identified: team SA (N=42 patients; 84 knees), single-surgeon SA (N=146 patients; 292 knees), single-surgeon TA (N=242 patients; 484 knees). No patients were lost to follow-up.Introduction
Methods
