Lisfranc injuries were previously described as fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints. With advancements in modern imaging, subtle Lisfranc injuries are now more frequently recognized, revealing that their true incidence is much higher than previously thought. Injury patterns can vary widely in severity and anatomy. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to achieve good outcomes. The original classification systems were anatomy-based, and limited as tools for guiding treatment. The current review, using the best available evidence, instead introduces a stability-based classification system, with weightbearing radiographs and CT serving as key diagnostic tools. Stable injuries generally have good outcomes with nonoperative management, most reliably treated with immobilization and non-weightbearing for six weeks. Displaced or comminuted injuries require surgical intervention, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) being the most common approach, with a consensus towards bridge plating. While ORIF generally achieves satisfactory results, its effectiveness can vary, particularly in high-energy injuries. Primary arthrodesis remains niche for the treatment of acute injuries, but may offer benefits such as lower rates of post-traumatic arthritis and hardware removal. Novel fixation techniques, including suture button fixation, aim to provide flexible stabilization, which theoretically could improve midfoot biomechanics and reduce complications. Early findings suggest promising functional outcomes, but further studies are required to validate this method compared with established techniques. Future research should focus on refining stability-based classification systems, validation of weightbearing CT, improving rehabilitation protocols, and optimizing surgical techniques for various injury patterns to ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(12):1431–1442.

Introduction

Early clinical examination combined with MRI following a high ankle sprain allows accurate diagnosis of syndesmosis instability. However, patients often present late, and for chronic injuries clinical assessment is less reliable. Furthermore, in many centres MRI may be not be readily available. The aims of the current study were to define MRI characteristics associated with syndesmosis instability, and to determine whether MRI patterns differed according to time from injury.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis in the foot and ankle affects approximately 30,000 patients annually in the UK. Evidence has shown that excess weight exacerbates foot pain, with significant increases in joint forces. However, despite the current trend for Clinical Commissioning Groups to ration surgery for obese patients, studies have not yet determined the effect of weight loss in obese patients with foot and ankle arthritis.

Introduction

Injections are used to treat a wide variety of pathologies. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of foot and ankle injections in our clinic.

The saphenous nerve is classically described as innervating skin of the medial foot to the first MTP joint and thus is at risk in surgery to the medial ankle and foot. However, it has previously been demonstrated that the dorsomedial branch of the superficial peroneal nerve consistently supplies the dorsomedial forefoot, and therefore previous descriptions of the saphenous nerve maybe erroneous.

We undertook a cadaveric study to assess the presence and variability of this nerve.

21 cadaveric feet were dissected from a level 5 cm above the medial malleolus, and distally to the termination of the saphenous nerve. In 16 specimens (76%), a saphenous nerve was present, of which 14 were anterior to the saphenous vein. Two of 16 nerves terminated above the medial malleolus. Therefore, only 14 of 21 specimens (66%) had a saphenous nerve present at the level of the medial malleolus. In seven of these 14 specimens (50%), the nerve terminally branched before the level of the tip of the malleolus. The mean distance reached in the foot was 46mm. Only two nerves reached the forefoot, at 97mm and 110 mm from the ankle joint respectively. At the ankle, the mean distance of the nerve from the tibialis anterior tendon was 9mm, and the saphenous vein 1.2mm.