The effects of dexamethasone (dex), during in vitro human osteogenesis, are contrasting. Indeed, dex downregulates SOX9 during osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (HBMSCs). However, dex also promotes PPARG expression, resulting in the formation of adipocyte-like cells within the osteogenic monolayers. The regulation of both SOX9 and PPARG seems to be downstream the transactivation activity of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), thus the effect of dex on SOX9 downregulation is indirect. This study aims at determining whether PPAR-γ regulates SOX9 expression levels, as suggested by several studies.

HBMSCs were isolated from bone marrow of patients with written informed consent. HBMSCs were cultured in different osteogenic induction media containing 10 or 100 nM dex. Undifferentiated cells were used as controls. Cells were treated either with a pharmacological PPAR-γ inhibitor T0070907 (donors n=4) or with a PPARG-targeting siRNA (donors n=2). Differentiation markers or PPAR-γ target genes were analysed by RT-qPCR. Mineral deposition was assessed by ARS staining. Two-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's multiple comparison test compared the effects of treatments.

At day 7, T0070907 downregulated ADIPOQ and upregulated CXCL8, respectively targets of PPAR-γ-mediated transactivation and transrepression. RUNX2 and SOX9 were also significantly downregulated in absence of dex. PPARG was successfully downregulated by siRNA. ADIPOQ expression was also inhibited, while CXCL8 did not show any significant difference between siRNA treatment groups. RUNX2 was downregulated by the PPARG-siRNA treatment in presence of 100 nM dexamethasone, while SOX9 levels were not affected. ARS showed no change in the mineralization levels when PPARG expression or activity was inhibited.

Understanding how dex regulates HBMSC differentiation is of pivotal importance to refine current in vitro models. These results suggest that PPARG does not mediate SOX9 downregulation. Unexpectedly, RUNX2 expression was also unaltered or even downregulated after PPAR-γ inhibition.

Acknowledgements: AO Foundation, AO Research Institute (CH) and PRIN 2017 MUR (IT) for financial support.

Peri-prosthetic bone loss caused by stress shielding may be associated with aseptic loosening of femoral components. In order to increase primary stability and to reduce stress shielding, a three-dimensional, cementless individual femoral (Evolution K) component was manufactured using pre-operative CT scans. Using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, peri-prosthetic bone density was measured in 43 patients, three months, six months, 3.6 and 4.6 years after surgery. At final follow-up there was a significant reduction in mean bone density in the proximal Gruen zones of −30.3% (zone 7) and −22.8% (zone 1). The density in the other zones declined by a mean of between −4% and −16%. We conclude that the manufacture of a three-dimensional, custom-made femoral component could not prevent a reduction in peri-prosthetic bone density.

Our aim was to determine the precision of the measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal femur before and after implantation of an uncemented implant, with particular regard to the significance of retro- and prospective studies.

We examined 60 patients to determine the difference in preoperative BMD between osteoarthritic and healthy hips. The results showed a preoperative BMD of the affected hip which was lower by a mean of 4% and by a maximum of 9% compared with the opposite side. In addition, measurements were made in the operated hip before and at ten days after operation to determine the effect of the implantation of an uncemented custom-made femoral stem. The mean increase in the BMD was 8% and the maximum was 24%. Previous retrospective studies have reported a marked loss of BMD on the operated side.

The precision of double measurements using a special foot jig showed a modified coefficient of variation of 0.6% for the non-operated side in 15 patients and of 0.6% for the operated femur in 20 patients.

The effect of rotation on the precision of the measurements after implantation of an uncemented femoral stem was determined in ten explanted femora and for the operated side in ten patients at 10° rotation and in 20 patients at 30° rotation. Rotation within 30° influenced the precision in studies in vivo and in vitro by a mean of 3% and in single cases in up to 60%.

Precise prediction of the degree of loss of BMD is thus only possible in prospective cross-sectional measurements, since the effect of the difference in preoperative BMD, as well as the apparent increase in BMD after implantation of an uncemented stem, is not known from retrospective studies. The DEXA method is a reliable procedure for determining periprosthetic BMD when positioning and rotation are strictly controlled.