Department of Epidemiology, ASL RM/E, Rome, Italy

School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK

Faculty of Health, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent, UK

Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, “Tzanio” General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece

University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan

Thriasio General Hospital, Athens, Greece

To evaluate the efficacy of bracing in adolescent patients with AIS.

Cochrane systematic review

The following databases were searched with no language limitations: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and reference lists of articles. Extensive hand searching of grey literature was also conducted. RCT's and prospective cohort studies comparing braces with no treatment, other treatment, surgery, and different types of braces were included. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

Two studies were included. There was very low quality evidence from one prospective cohort study including 286 girls¹indicating that braces curbed curve progression, at the end of growth, (success rate 74%), better than observation, (34%) and electrical stimulation (33%). Another low quality evidence from one RCT with 43 girls indicated that a rigid brace is more successful than an elastic one (SpineCor) at limiting curve progression when measured in Cobb degrees². No significant differences between the two groups in the subjective perception of daily difficulties associated with brace wearing were found.

There is very low quality evidence in favour of using braces, making generalization very difficult. The results from future studies may differ from these results. In the meantime, patients' choices should be informed by multidisciplinary discussion. Future research should focus on short and long-term patient-centred outcomes as well as measures such as Cobb angles. RCTs and prospective cohort studies should follow both the SRS and the Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) criteria for bracing studies.

We reviewed 75 patients (57 men and 18 women), who had undergone tension-band laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (42 patients) or compression myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (33 patients) and had been followed for more than ten years. Clinical and functional results were estimated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. The rate of recovery and the level of postoperative axial neck pain were also recorded. The pre- and post-operative alignment of the cervical spine (Ishihara curve index indicating lordosis of the cervical spine) and the range of movement (ROM) of the cervical spine were also measured.

The mean rate of recovery of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at final follow-up was 52.1% (sd 24.6) and significant axial pain was reported by 19 patients (25.3%). Axial pain was reported more frequently in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament than in those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (p = 0.027). A kyphotic deformity was not seen post-operatively in any patient. The mean ROM decreased post-operatively from 32.8° (sd 12.3) to 16.2° (sd 12.3) (p < 0.001). The mean ROM ratio was 46.9% (sd 28.1) for all the patients. The mean ROM ratio was lower in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament than in those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (p < 0.001). Compared to those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament had less ROM and more post-operative axial neck pain.