Large heads offer substantial advantages over small ones in hip arthroplasty, as they are far less likely to dislocate. This feature is of particular benefit in very dysplastic females who often have a degree of joint laxity making dislocation a real possibility. Large metal heads have a range of problems, so registries report that they are now being substituted by large ceramic heads, typically reducing in diameter by 15% or more from the native size.

All current designs of the femoral ball heads, whether for resurfacing of replacement share a unique design characteristic: a subtended angle of 120° defining the proportion of a sphere that the head represents. A novel design has recently been proposed that might reduce conflict between the femoral ball head rim and the iliopsoas tendon. This paper explains the problem of iliopsoas impingement on femoral heads of native diameter, and the consequences.

INTRODUCTION:

The 3D shape of the normal proximal femur is poorly described in current designs of proximal femur prosthesis. Research has shown that in current implant designs with small diameter femoral heads the moment arm of the ilio-psoas tendon is reduced causing weakness in full extension, while large femoral heads cause psoas tendon impingement on the femoral head neck junction [1]. The femoral head-neck junction thus directly influences the hip flexor muscles' moment arm. Mathematical modeling of proximal femoral geometry allowed a novel proximal femur prosthesis to be developed that takes into account native anatomical parameters. We hypothesized that it is possible to fit a quadratic surface (e.g. sphere, cylinder…) or combinations of them on different bone surfaces with a relatively good fit.

It has been proposed that higher knee adduction moments and associated malalignment in subjects with severe medial knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) is due to anatomical deformities as a result of OA [1, 2]. The emergence of patient-matched implants should allow for correction of any existing malalignment. Currently the plans for such surgeries are often based on three dimensional supine computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which may not be representative of malalignment during functional loading. We investigated differences in frontal plane alignment in control subjects and subjects with severe knee joint OA who had undergone both supine imaging and gait analysis.

Fifteen subjects with severe knee OA, affecting either the medial or lateral compartment, and 18 control subjects were selected from a database established as part of a larger study. All subjects had undergone gait analysis using the Vicon motion capture system. OA subjects had undergone routine CT scans and were scheduled for knee joint replacement surgery. Control subjects had no known musculoskeletal conditions and had undergone MRI imaging of hip, knee and ankle joints. Frontal plane knee joint angles were measured from supine imaging (supine) and from motion capture during standing (static) and during gait at the first peak ground reaction force (gait).

OA subjects had a significantly higher BMI (p < 0.01) and different gender composition (13 males and 2 females vs 4 males and 5 females; p = 0.03) compared with controls. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated no significant confounding effect of these differences on frontal plane angles measured in supine, static or gait conditions.

For both OA and healthy subjects, frontal plane knee angles were significantly higher during gait compared with supine (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). There were also significant differences in knee alignment between OA and healthy subjects for supine and static (p < 0.05) but not for gait, although this was approaching significance (p = 0.052). Overall there seemed to be higher variation in alignment in the OA subjects (Fig. 1).

The significantly higher frontal plane knee joint angles measured in both control and OA subjects during gait compared with supine imaging indicate that functional alignment should be taken into consideration when planning patient-specific surgeries. Higher variation in OA patients may be due to alterations in gait patterns due to pain or degree of wear in their osteoarthritic joints, and requires further investigation. In addition, methodological considerations should be taken when comparing alignment from measurements taken with imaging and motion capture to avoid systematic errors in the data. In conclusion, we believe that both supine and loadbearing imaging are insufficient to gain a full representation of functional alignment, and analysis of functional alignment should be routinely performed for optimal surgical planning.

Introduction:

Cam type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may lead to osteoarthritis (OA)[1]. In 2D studies, an alpha angle greater than 55° was considered abnormal however limitations of 2D alpha angle measurement have led to the development of 3D methods [2–4]. Failure to completely address the bony impingement lesions during surgery has been the most common reason for unsuccessful hip arthroscopy surgery [5]. Robotic technology has facilitated more accurate surgery in comparison to the conventional means. In this study we aim to assess the potential application of robotic technology in dealing with this technically challenging procedure of cam sculpting surgery.

Barriers to the adoption of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by new consultants could be explained by its higher revision rate, to which mal-positioned components contribute. The aim of this study was to determine whether robotic technology enables inexperienced surgeons to perform accurate UKAs when compared to current conventional methods

After randomisation, sixteen trainees who had never performed UKAs performed three medial UKAs (Corin Uniglide), one per week, on dry-bone simulators by either robotic (Sculptor RGA) or conventional methods. They were instructed to match a universal 3D-CT based pre-operative plan that would result from a UKA based on the conventional jigs and operating guide. The knees were laser scanned and software used to compare the planned and actual implant positions. Feedback was given to trainees between attempts. Translational and rotational positioning errors were measured in all six degrees of freedom for both components

At all attempts robotic medial UKAs were more accurate in both translational and rotational alignments for both components reaching statistical significance (p<0.005) at all attempts for rotational errors. Considering outliers, the maximum rotational errors of the robot group was 9° and 7° for the tibial and femoral components respectively. For the conventional group this reached 18° and 16° for the tibial and femoral components respectively

Robotic technology allows inexperienced surgeons to perform medial UKAs on dry bone models with acceptable accuracy and precision on their first attempt. Conventional jigs do not. The adoption of robotic technology might provide new consultants with the confidence to offer UKAs to their patients by limiting the inaccuracies inherent in conventional equipment.

We examined the relationship between the size of the femoral cam in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular pathomorphology to establish if pincer impingement exists in patients with a femoral cam.

CT scans of 37 symptomatic impinging hips with a femoral cam were analysed in a three-dimensional study and were compared with 34 normal hips. The inclination and version of the acetabulum as well as the acetabular rim angle and the bony acetabular coverage were calculated. These measurements were correlated with the size and shape of the femoral cams.

While the size of the femoral cam varied characteristically, the acetabular morphology of the two groups was similar in terms of version (normal mean 23° (sd 7°); cam mean 22° (sd 9°)), inclination (normal mean 57° (sd 5°); cam mean 56° (sd 5°)), acetabular coverage (normal mean 41% (sd 5%); cam mean 42% (sd 4%)) and the mean acetabular rim angle (normal mean 82° (sd 5°); cam mean 83° (sd 4°)).

We found no correlation between acetabular morphology and the severity of cam lesion and no evidence of either global or focal over-coverage to support the diagnosis of ‘mixed’ FAI. The femoral cam may provoke edge loading but removal of any acetabular bearing surface when treating cam FAI might induce accelerated wear.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:314–19.

Metal on Metal hip resurfacing (MoM HR) can be an effective operation for the young arthritic hip population. However, errors in cup orientation have been associated with increased wear, circulating blood metal ions, and soft tissue abnormalities that can lead to premature failure of the bearing surface and subsequent revision surgery. While image free computer guidance has been shown to increase surgical accuracy in total hip arthroplasty, the role of image based technology in MoM HR is unclear. In this study, we compared the accuracy of cup orientation in MoM HR performed by either freehand technique or CT based navigation.

Seventy five patients (81 hips) underwent either freehand (n=42) or navigation (n=39) surgery, both requiring a three dimensional (3D) CT surgical plan. Surgery was conducted by hip specialists blind to the method of cup implantation until the operation. Deviation in inclination and version from the planned orientation, as well as, number of cups within a 10° safe zone and 5° optimal zone of the target position was calculated using post operative 3D CT analysis.

Error in inclination was significantly reduced with navigation compared to freehand technique (4° vs 6°, p=0.02). We could not detect a difference between the two groups for version error (5° vs 7°, p=0.06). There was a significantly greater number of hips within a 10° (87% vs 67%, p=0.04) and 5° (50% vs 20%, p=0.06) safe zone when navigated.

Image based navigation can substantially improve accuracy in cup orientation. The results of our freehand group appear better than historic controls, suggesting the use of a 3D plan may help to reduce technical error and improve the learning curve in this technically demanding procedure. We advocate the use of image based navigation in MoM hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacement has a failure rate of almost 8% at five years, three times the revision rate of conventional hip replacement. Unexplained pain remains a feature of this type of arthroplasty.

All designs of the femoral component of large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacements share a unique characteristic: a subtended angle of 120° defining the proportion of a sphere that the head represents. Using MRI, we measured the contact area of the iliopsoas tendon on the femoral head in sagittal reconstruction of 20 hips of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. We also measured the articular extent of the femoral head on 40 normal hips and ten with cam-type deformities. Finally, we performed virtual hip resurfacing on normal and cam-type hips, avoiding overhang of the metal rim inferomedially.

The articular surface of the femoral head has a subtended angle of 120° anteriorly and posteriorly, but only 100° medially. Virtual surgery in a normally shaped femoral head showed a 20° skirt of metal protruding medially where iliopsoas articulates.

The excessive extent of the large-diameter femoral components may cause iliopsoas impingement independently of the acetabular component. This may be the cause of postoperative pain with these implants.