The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the functional outcomes of patients treated for isolated fracture of the greater tuberosity (GT) and to determine how their outcomes were affected by fracture pattern, treatment choices, associated shoulder injuries, the post fixation displacement of GT fragment and the time delay between injury and fixation. Forty-eight (28 male and 20 female) patients (mean age 45 years) treated at our institution between 1999–2009 matched our inclusion criteria. Thirty-five patients were treated surgically and 13 conservatively. Functional outcome was assessed using Oxford scores (OS), University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) rating scale and the shoulder index of the American Shoulder and Elbow surgeons (ASES). The outpatient follow up time required and the presence of other shoulder injuries, time delay to surgery and the time off work were also recorded.Background
Methods
Isolated Greater Tuberosity (GT) fractures were described as separate entities from proximal humeral fractures more than 100 years ago. However, there is limited literature available about the functional outcome of the two different types of GT fractures: avulsed and comminuted To compare functional outcomes of the 2 different types of Greater Tuberosity fractures; simple and comminuted and to determine how these outcomes were affected by associated injuries such as shoulder dislocation and rotator cuff tear. We also looked at the acceptable post fixation displacement of GT fracture and when to consider it mal-reduction (malunion due to over or under reduction) and the acceptable time frame to delay the fixation and still get satisfactory results. We looked at Greater Tuberosity fractures of the humerus in Waikato Hospital between 1999–2009. Radiographs were reviewed by senior Author to classify them into simple and comminuted. Measurements were done by senior Author for post fixation displacement. Operative notes checked by the authors, when in doubt, double-checked by senior author. Outcome scores used: UCLA, ASES and oxford scores to compare functional outcome. We also measured the time off work and time on ACC (Physiotherapy), as well as period of follow up. A total of 35 patients were included in the final analysis were treated operatively. Mean age of the patients was 51 years. M/F ratio was 3/2. Mechanism of injury was predominantly direct force applied to that shoulder. Shoulder dislocation was found in around 77% of patients. Methods of fixation included tension band wiring with or without screws, rotator cuff repair and one T-plate. Follow up time was shorter for simple comminuted fractures (22 v 44 weeks respectively). Outcome scores for patients who sustained simple fractures were slightly higher than those with comminuted fractures but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The groups with dislocation and rotator cuff tear did worse than the other groups in all aspects of the study. Post fixation displacement of GT of less than 5 mm led to a significantly better outcome than displacement of 5mm plus. Better results were obtained when the time between injury and operation was less than 2 weeks. The comminuted group had similar functional outcome to the other group but required much longer follow up. Worse outcome should be expected with dislocation and rotator cuff tear associated with GT fracture. Satisfactory results relate to degree of displacement post fixation of <5 mm. Delay of fracture fixation of >2 weeks results in a less favourable outcome.
