There are significant differences in the methods and styles of orthopaedic surgical training between continents, all with the aim to produce competent consultant surgeons, but the differences in training content and pathway are vast. We review and contrast the key differences between three continents.

Exsanguination is the second most common cause of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial, as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation. Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative measures may not be the safest strategy.

This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of high-energy pelvic fractures, including resuscitation, transfusion of blood components, monitoring of coagulopathy, and procedural interventions including pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, external fixation and angiographic embolisation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1143–54.

We explore the limitations of complete reliance on evidence-based medicine which can be diminished by confounding issues and sampling bias. Other strategies which may be reasonably invoked are discussed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:997–9.

Objective

To identify risk factors for surgical site infections and to quantify the contribution of independent risk factors to the probability of developing infection after definitive fixation of tibial plateau fractures.

The ideal form of fixation for displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. In the UK, open reduction and internal fixation with locking-plates and intramedullary nailing are the two most common forms of treatment. Both techniques provide reliable fixation but both are associated with specific complications. There is little information regarding the functional recovery following either procedure.

We performed a randomised pilot trial to determine the functional outcome of 24 adult patients treated with either a locking-plate (n = 12) or an intramedullary nailing (n = 12). At six months, there was an adjusted difference of 13 points in the Disability Rating Index in favour of the intramedullary nail. However, this was not statistically significant in this pilot trial (p = 0.498). A total of seven patients required further surgery in the locking-plate group and one in the intramedullary nail group.

This study suggests that there may be clinically relevant, functional differences in patients treated with nail versus locking-plate fixation for fractures of the distal tibia and differences in related complications. Further trials are required to confirm the findings of this pilot investigation.

Introduction: Spinous process osteotomy (SPO) and multiple laminotomy can be used for multi-level lumbar decompression. We conducted an experimental study to compare the effects of these two methods on spinal kinetics.

Method: Ten fresh calf spines (L2- sacrum) were mounted in dental stone and segmental motion of L3 relative to L5 was assessed using an electromagnetic 3-D motion detection system (FASTRAK, Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA). Pure moments of 0, 2.5, 5, 7, and 10 Nm were used in flexion/extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation. The moments were generated by applying two equal and opposite forces (weights) to the perimeter of a plastic circular disc, which was fixed to the superior end plate of L3 by three screws. In five spines decompression was performed at L3/4 and 4/5 using standard laminotomy technique. Decompression using SPO was done at L3–5 through a unilateral approach in the rest. Segmental mobility between the two methods was compared using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Mean range of motion in the specimens before intervention was-lateral bending (32.70 ± 7.6 SD), rotation (13.10 ± 4.8 SD), flexion/extension (19.30 ± 7.1 SD). There was statistically significant difference between mean increase in lateral bending after SPO to that following laminotomy (4.00 ± 1.5 SD vs 0.60 ± 1.6 SD; p=0.008). Mean increase in flexion- extension after SPO was not significantly different from that after laminotomy (4.50 ± 1.1 SD vs 3.90 ± 3.8 SD; p= 0.75). There was no difference in the mean increase in axial rotation after SPO compared to that following laminotomy (7.90 ± 3.6 SD vs 6.80 ± 5.0 SD; p= 0.75).

Conclusions: Both laminotomy and SPO produced increased range of motion in a calf spine model. SPO produced significant increase in lateral bending although its clinical significance is unknown.

Ethics approval: none

Interest Statement: Local grant (Research Fund, Centre for Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, UK

Background: The best treatment for displaced distal radius fracture is still debated. The aim of our study is to use the PRWE and Euroqol questionnaires to look at patients function at a minimum of 1 year following distal radius fracture.

Method: 32 consecutive patients with a Colles-type fracture were treated surgically. 16 were treated with K wires and 16 underwent an open reduction and internal fixation. At a minimum of one year the PRWE and Euroqol questionnaires were filled in.

Results: Intra articular and extra articular fractures were equally distributed between the 2 groups. The Euroqol the EQVAS and PRWE scores showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups (respectively p=0.7 CI 95% -0.23 to 0.17; p=0.05 CI -30 to 0.6 and p=0.5 CI 95% -18 to 9.4).

Conclusion: Using PRWE and Euroqol, there is no short term functional difference between patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous wire fixation or open reduction and internal fixation following a distal radius fracture.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a modified version of the pivot shift test in detecting ruptures of the anterior cruciate (ACL) ligament.

Methods: Two groups of patients aged 18 to 50 years were recruited from operating theatre lists examined at a check and consent clinic. One of the groups had ACL deficient knees and the control group had intact ACL, later proven at arthroscopy. A total of 48 independent examinations, 26 with ACL rupture and 22 without, were undertaken by a consultant or registrar proficient in the modified version of the pivot shift test. At the start of the consultation the examiner, who was blinded to the operation that the patient was listed for and to the patient’s history, performed the modified pivot shift test only. The result of the test was reported as positive or negative for ACL rupture to the study co-ordinator before the examiner continued with the consultation.

Results: Of the 26 examinations of ACL deficient knees, 22 were reported as positive and four negative for ACL rupture using the pivot shift test only. Of the 22 examinations of ACL intact knees one was reported as positive for ACL rupture and 21 as negative. This gives a specificity and sensitivity of the modified version of the pivot shift test as 95.5% (95% CI 75.1–99.8%) and 84.6% (95%CI 64.3–95.0%) respectively.

Conclusion: The modified pivot shift test is an accurate test for the detection of ACL rupture. Our modified pivot shift test compares favourably with data from previous accuracy studies of previously described versions of the pivot shift test. We now plan to assess the accuracy of the modified pivot shift test when carried out by medical students and junior doctors.