Exsanguination is the second most common cause
of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of
haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial,
as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons
on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation.
Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents
or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains
unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in
these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative
measures may not be the safest strategy. This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic
injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of
high-energy pelvic fractures, including resuscitation, transfusion
of blood components, monitoring of coagulopathy, and procedural
interventions including pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, external
fixation and angiographic embolisation. Cite this article:
To identify risk factors for surgical site infections and to quantify the contribution of independent risk factors to the probability of developing infection after definitive fixation of tibial plateau fractures. A retrospective analysis was performed at a Level I trauma center between 2004 and 2010. A total of 251 consecutive patients (256 cases) were divided into two groups, those with and those without a surgical site infection. Preoperative and perioperative variables were compared between these groups and risk factors were determined by univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression.Objective
Methods
The ideal form of fixation for displaced, extra-articular
fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. In the UK, open
reduction and internal fixation with locking-plates and intramedullary
nailing are the two most common forms of treatment. Both techniques
provide reliable fixation but both are associated with specific
complications. There is little information regarding the functional
recovery following either procedure. We performed a randomised pilot trial to determine the functional
outcome of 24 adult patients treated with either a locking-plate
(n = 12) or an intramedullary nailing (n = 12). At six months, there
was an adjusted difference of 13 points in the Disability Rating
Index in favour of the intramedullary nail. However, this was not
statistically significant in this pilot trial (p = 0.498). A total
of seven patients required further surgery in the locking-plate
group and one in the intramedullary nail group. This study suggests that there may be clinically relevant, functional
differences in patients treated with nail
