Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVIII | Pages 118 - 118
1 Sep 2012
Kellett CF Mackay ND Nutt J Mehdian R McLeod R
Full Access

Purpose

Students attend operating room sessions throughout their medical school training and are often given the opportunity to scrub and assist during the surgery. Many students have no or very little formal teaching in operating room etiquette, which leads to last minute on the job training from operating room staff. This study aimed to identify if there was any difference between the students knowledge, technique and competency in operating room etiquette skills between two groups of students who received different methods of teaching.

Method

Thirty three 2nd year medical students, that had no previous exposure to operating room etiquette, were recruited for this study. There was variation in their age 18 to 27 years (mean SD years; 19.7 1.9). All students were initially observed scrubbing, gowning and gloving using their baseline knowledge. Their technique was scored using the Dundee University Assessment Sheet and each students knowledge was tested using a spot the mistake quiz. The students were ranked on initial competency then using randomised stratification, separated into two groups. Group One received traditional teaching by operating room staff. Group Two was taught using the new operating room etiquette course, which includes a power point presentation, a video and a practical session. Both groups knowledge and practical skills were reassessed following their teaching. The assessment was repeated at 3 months using the same method, to measure longer-term learning.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XX | Pages 14 - 14
1 May 2012
Mehdian H Mehdian R Copas D
Full Access

Objective

The use of all pedicle screw constructs for the management of spinal deformities has gained widespread popularity. However, the placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine poses unique challenges for the spinal surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and radiological outcomes of surgery in 124 consecutive patients with spinal deformity. These patients underwent correction of coronal and sagittal imbalance with segmental pedicle screw fixation only.

Background

All pedicle screw constructs have been associated with improved correction in all three planes. In patients with severe deformity, such constructs can obviate the need for anterior surgeries, and the higher implant cost is offset by the avoidance of dual anterior and posterior approaches. Pedicle screw fixation enables enhanced correction of spinal deformities, but the technique is still not widely applied for thoracic deformities for fear of neurological complications. This is a retrospective study that was carried out on 124 patients who underwent segmental screw fixation for coronal and sagittal spinal deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and outcomes of this technique and also assess the evidence of enhanced correction.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 426 - 426
1 Jul 2010
Mehdian R Nutt J Harshavardhana N Mehdian S
Full Access

Purpose: To determine presentation to publication conversion rate(PPCR) in peer-reviewed indexed journals of abstracts presented at SRS annual meetings and to evaluate for consistency between abstracts and subsequently published full-text articles(FTA).

Methods: We reviewed all presentations (podium & posters) of past SRS annual meeting proceedings(2000–04) and undertook a comprehensive PubMed search to determine if the abstract was followed by a publication subsequent to its presentation as FTA up to Dec 2008. The published FTA was compared with original abstract(OAb) and evaluated for consistency with respect to study cohort/design, conclusion and authorship against a structured proforma.

Results: 1063 abstracts(452 podium;611 posters) were identified. 560 (295 podium;265 posters) were published as FTA in 51 journals. The overall PPCR was 52.68%(65.26 for podium;43.37% for posters). Two-thirds of them were published in Spine (361 FTA). 87.32% of them were published within 3 years of presentation(489/560). Interestingly 16 presentations were already published as FTA before their sub-mission(2.85%). The PPCR was 1.5 times higher for free-papers as compared to posters and was statistically significant (p< 0.0001) and OR 2.45(1.90–3.15).

Conclusion: The PPCR of SRS presentations is better than AAOS(34.2%;Bhandari et al, JBJS(Am)2002:84(4),615–21) and stands high in comparison to other medical specialties (32–72%). Though the studies were of high quality/content, changes to the cohort, authors or/& conclusion was common (seen in two-thirds of FTA). The acceptance of an abstract for podium presentation at SRS annual meeting is a benchmark of quality. However they (esp. posters) should be interpreted with caution until their subsequent publication as a FTA.

Ethics approval: Not applicable

Interest Statement: None (No grants obtained from any agency).