To assess the incidence of radiological lateral osteoarthritis (OA) at 15 years after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and assess the relationship of lateral OA with symptoms and patient characteristics. Cemented Phase 3 medial Oxford UKA implanted by two surgeons since 1998 for the recommended indications were prospectively followed. A 15-year cumulative revision rate for lateral OA of 5% for this series was previously reported. A total of 163 unrevised knees with 15-year (SD 1) anterior-posterior knee radiographs were studied. Lateral joint space width (JSWL) was measured and severity of lateral OA was classified as: nil/mild, moderate, and severe. Preoperative and 15-year Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and American Knee Society Scores were determined. The effect of age, sex, BMI, and intraoperative findings was analyzed. Statistical analysis included one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis H test, with significance set at 5%.Aims
Methods
To report mid- to long-term results of Oxford mobile bearing domed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and determine the effect of potential contraindications on outcome. A total of 325 consecutive domed lateral UKAs undertaken for the recommended indications were included, and their functional and survival outcomes were assessed. The effects of age, weight, activity, and the presence of full-thickness erosions of cartilage in the patellofemoral joint on outcome were evaluated.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the polyethylene wear rate of Phase 3 Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement bearings and to investigate the effects of resin type and manufacturing process. A total of 63 patients with at least ten years’ follow-up with three bearing types (1900 resin machined, 1050 resin machined, and 1050 resin moulded) were recruited. Patients underwent full weight-bearing model-based radiostereometric analysis to determine the bearing thickness. The linear wear rate was estimated from the change in thickness divided by the duration of implantation.Objectives
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers significant advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but is reported to have higher revision rates in joint registries. In both the New Zealand and the UK national registry the revision rate of cementless UKR is less than cementless. It is not clear whether this is because the cementless is better or because more experienced surgeons, who tend to get better results are using cementless. We aim to use registry data to compare cemented and cementless UKA outcomes, matching for surgical experience and other factors. We performed a retrospective observational study using National Joint Registry (NJR) data on 10,836 propensity matched Oxford UKAs (5418 cemented and 5418 cementless) between 2004 and 2015. Logistic regression was utilized to calculate propensity scores to match the cemented and cementless groups for multiple confounders using a one to one ratio. Standardised mean differences were used before and after matching to assess for any covariate imbalances. The outcomes studied were implant survival, reasons for revision and patient survival. The endpoint for implant survival was revision surgery (any component removal or exchange). Cumulative patient and implant survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients not undergoing revision or death were censored on the study end date. The study endpoints implant and patient survival were compared between cemented and cementless groups using Cox regression models with a robust variance estimator.Introduction
Methods
The revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in national joint registries is much higher than that of total knee replacements and that of UKR in cohort studies from multiple high-volume centres. The reasons for this are unclear but may be due to incorrect patient selection, inadequate surgical technique, and inappropriate indications for revision. Meniscal bearing UKR has well defined evidence based indications based on preoperative radiographs, the surgical technique can be assessed from post-operative radiographs and the reason for revision from pre-revision radiographs. However, for an accurate assessment aligned radiographs are required. The aim of the study was to determine why the revision rate of UKR in registries is so high by undertaking a radiographic review of revised UKR identified by the United Kingdom's (UK) National Joint Registry (NJR). A novel cross-sectional study was designed. Revised medial meniscal bearing UKR with primary operation registered with the NJR between 2006 and 2010 were identified. Participating centres from all over the country provided blinded pre-operative, post-operative, and pre-revision radiographs. Two observers reviewed the radiographs.Introduction
Methods
The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interference fit by measuring the force required to seat the tibial component of the cementless OUKR (push-in force) and the force required to remove the component (pull-out force). Six cementless OUKR tibial components were implanted in 12 new slots prepared on blocks of solid polyurethane foam (20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF), Sawbones, Malmo, Sweden) with a range of interference of 0.1 mm to 1.9 mm using a Dartec materials testing machine HC10 (Zwick Ltd, Herefordshire, United Kingdom) . The experiment was repeated with cellular polyurethane foam (15 PCF), which is a more porous analogue for trabecular bone.Objectives
Materials and Methods
It is not clear whether anterior knee pain and osteoarthritis
(OA) of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) are contraindications to
medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Our aim was to
investigate the long-term outcome of a consecutive series of patients,
some of whom had anterior knee pain and PFJ OA managed with UKA. We assessed the ten-year functional outcomes and 15-year implant
survival of 805 knees (677 patients) following medial mobile-bearing
UKA. The intra-operative status of the PFJ was documented and, with
the exception of bone loss with grooving to the lateral side, neither
the clinical or radiological state of the PFJ nor the presence of
anterior knee pain were considered a contraindication. The impact
of radiographic findings and anterior knee pain was studied in a
subgroup of 100 knees (91 patients).Aims
Patients and Methods
While medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is indicated
for patients with full-thickness cartilage loss, it is occasionally
used to treat those with partial-thickness loss. The aim of this
study was to investigate the five-year outcomes in a consecutive
series of UKAs used in patients with partial thickness cartilage
loss in the medial compartment of the knee. Between 2002 and 2014, 94 consecutive UKAs were undertaken in
90 patients with partial thickness cartilage loss and followed up
independently for a mean of six years (1 to 13). These patients
had partial thickness cartilage loss either on both femur and tibia
(13 knees), or on either the femur or the tibia, with full thickness
loss on the other surface of the joint (18 and 63 knees respectively).
Using propensity score analysis, these patients were matched 1:2 based
on age, gender and pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) with knees
with full thickness loss on both the femur and tibia. The functional
outcomes, implant survival and incidence of re-operations were assessed
at one, two and five years post-operatively. A subgroup of 36 knees
in 36 patients with partial thickness cartilage loss, who had pre-operative
MRI scans, was assessed to identify whether there were any factors
identified on MRI that predicted the outcome.Aims
Patients and Methods
This prospective study reports the 15-year survival and ten-year
functional outcome of a consecutive series of 1000 minimally invasive
Phase 3 Oxford medial UKAs (818 patients, 393 men, 48%, 425 women,
52%, mean age 66 years; 32 to 88). These were implanted by two surgeons
involved with the design of the prosthesis to treat anteromedial
osteoarthritis and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, which
are recommended indications. Patients were prospectively identified
and followed up independently for a mean of 10.3 years (5.3 to 16.6). At ten years, the mean Oxford Knee Score was 40 (standard deviation
( This is the only large series of minimally invasive UKAs with
15-year survival data. The results support the continued use of
minimally invasive UKA for the recommended indications. Cite this article:
