The Covid-19 pandemic restricted access to elective arthroplasty theatres. Consequently, there was a staggering rise in waiting times for patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA). Concomitantly, rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDOA) incidence also increased.

Two cohorts of patients were reviewed: patients undergoing primary THA, pre-pandemic (December 2017-December 2018) and patients with RDOA (ascertained by dual consultant review of pre-operative radiographs) undergoing THA after the pandemic started (March 2020 – March 2022). There were 236 primary THA cases in the pre-pandemic cohort. Out of the 632 primary THA cases post-pandemic, 186 cases (29%) had RDOA. Within this RDOA cohort, the pre-operative mean OHS, EQ5D3L and EQVAS (12.7, 10.5 and 57.6 respectively) were all poorer than in the pre-pandemic population (18.3, 9.4 and 66.7 respectively) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the RDOA and pre-pandemic cohort in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) at 12 months, perhaps due to their ceiling effect.

Within the RDOA cohort, 7 cases required acetabular augments, 1 of which also required femoral shortening. The rate of intra-operative fracture, dislocation, infection, return to theatre, and revision were 2.2%, 2.7%, 4.3%, 3.8% and 2.2% respectively, greater than those reported in the literature. No fractures nor dislocations occurred in robot assisted arthroplasties.

With ever increasing waiting lists, RDOA prevalence will continue to rise. Increased surgical challenges and potential use of additional implants generated by its presence excludes these patients from waiting list initiative pathways, potentiating the complexity of the operative procedure. Going forwards, the economic burden and training implications must be considered.

Aim:

Our aim was to report the rate and risk factors for post-operative complications in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis for scoliosis, with a comparison to neuromuscular scoliosis of other aetiology.

Introduction and Aims: Distal biceps ruptures are an uncommon injury. They represent approximately three percent of all biceps ruptures. Intervention was popularised by Boyd and Anderson who described a two-incision technique. Improved outcome has been achieved with stronger fixation allowing early mobilisation.

Method: All patients who underwent operative fixation of distal biceps ruptures by the senior two authors were identified. All patients were clinically reviewed at a minimum of six months from surgery. Functional outcomes scores in the form of Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and DASH scores were assessed. The operative technique utilised the Endobutton (Smith and Nephew) and is a substantial modification of that published by Bain,G et al.

Results: Thirty-one patients were identified. All patients were male with an average age of 47 years. Average delay to surgery was 24 days. There were no postoperative complications and no repeat ruptures. Thirty patients have returned Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) forms with an average score of eight. Cybex testing demonstrates good return of strength when compared to the uninjured side.

Conclusion: Fixation of distal biceps ruptures using this modified Endobutton technique is a safe and effective method.