The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the acetabular component introducer as a tool to intra-operatively predict implant inclination in total hip arthroplasty. This study investigated (1) the correlation between intra-operative photographic assessment of cup inclination using the acetabular introducer and that measured on post-operative radiograph; and (2) the accuracy of intra-operative prediction of abduction angle. For this study, we prospectively recruited 56 patients scheduled to receive primary hip arthroplasty from one of two senior surgeons. During the procedure, the lead surgeon provided a prediction of the abduction angle based on the alignment of the impactor attached to the cup in its final seated position. A standardized anteroposterior (AP) photograph was then taken of the acetabular impactor Measurements of cup position made from post-operative radiographs were significantly correlated with the measurements as assessed by intra-operative photographs (r = 0.34, p = 0.00). Our findings demonstrate that radiological abduction angles tend to be greater than that assessed by intra-operative photographs by a mean of 5.6 degrees (SD = 6.6 degrees; 95% CI = 7.3 to 3.9 degrees). Conversely, surgeon prediction of cup inclination based on the acetabular introducer differed from the radiographic measurements by a mean of 6.8 degrees (SD = 8.7 degrees). There was good agreement between the two observers in both photographic and radiographic measurement (k = 0.95, k = 0.96, respectively). In conclusion, we found that the intra-operative photographic assessment of acetabular cup inclination by acetabular impactor alignment tends to underestimate the abduction angle by a mean of approximately 5 degrees. In addition, intra-operative surgeon estimation of acetabular inclination did not appear accurate in this study demonstrating that cup position should rely on additional visual cues beyond that captured in the anteroposterior view of the cup introducer.
The use of computer navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of femoral component placement compared to conventional instrumentation in hip resurfacing. Whether exposure to computer navigation improves accuracy when the procedure is subsequently performed with conventional instrumentation without navigation has not been explored. We examinedwhether femoral component alignment utilizing a conventional jig improves following experience with the use of imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing. Between December 2004 and December 2008, 213 consecutive hip resurfacings were performed by a single surgeon. The first 17 (Cohort 1) and the last 9 (Cohort 2) hip resurfacings were performed using a conventional guidewire alignment jig. In 187 cases the femoral component was implanted using the imageless computer navigation. Cohorts 1 and 2 were compared for femoral component alignment accuracy.Purpose:
Methods:
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may contribute to the development of early onset hip osteoarthritis (OA). A cam lesion (or pistol grip deformity) of the proximal femur reduces head-neck offset resulting in cam type FAI. The alpha angle is a radiographic measurement recommended for diagnosis of cam type FAI. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients that develop end stage hip OA prior to 55 years of age have radiographic evidence of cam type FAI. The anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and lateral hip radiographs of 244 patients (261 hips) who presented to our institution for hip arthroplasty or hip fracture fixation between 2006 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Three cohorts were compared: 1) patients with end stage hip OA < 55 years old (N=76); 2) patients with end stage hip OA > 55 years old (N=84); 3) hip fracture patients > 65 years old without radiographic evidence of hip arthritis were used as controls (N=101). Patients with inflammatory arthritis, avascular necrosis and post-traumatic hip OA were excluded. Alpha angles were measured on the AP pelvis and lateral radiographs by three coauthors using ImageJ 1.43 software (National Institutes of Health, USA). For patients with end stage hip OA, AP alpha angles were measured on both the hip with OA and the contralateral hip. Lateral alpha angles were measured only on the hip with OA. For patients with hip fracture, AP alpha angles were measured on the non-fractured hip and lateral alpha angles were measured on the fractured hip. A one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukeys HSD test was used to compare the AP and lateral alpha angles for the three cohorts.Purpose
Method
