Osseointegration is a potential treatment option for transfemoral amputees experiencing socket related problems. Till this date, there is little data assessing the feasibility and advantages of osseointegration in individuals with transtibial amputations. We prospectively followed 91 patients undergoing transtibial osseointegration from 2014–2018 who either 1) reported pain or mobility dissatisfaction with socket prosthesis; 2) had an intact limb with incapacitating pain, complex deformity, or profound distal weakness or 3) were recent amputees preferring osseointegration. Adverse events were monitored including infection, periprosthetic fracture, implant breakage, aseptic loosening, revision surgery/additional amputation and death. Functional outcomes were measured using the Questionnaire of persons with a Trans-femoral amputation (Q-TFA) and mobility was assessed using Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and Time Up and Go (TUG).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Osseointegration has been established as a promising approach for the reconstruction of amputated limbs, particularly for amputees suffering from traditional socket prosthesis (TSP). While Osseointegration was originally developed with a screw fixation design, several Osseointegration devices adopting a modern press-fit design have also been introduced. In this study, medium-term outcomes for patients with the two most common press-fit osseointegration implant used worldwide are analysed. This is a cross-sectional analysis containing a cohort of Osseointegration patients treated in several centres worldwide. We analyzed a total of 93 patients with an average follow-up time of 6.52 years. Functional, Mobility and patient reported outcomes were collected pre-operatively and during follow-up. All postoperative adverse events (infection, revision surgery, fractures, and implant failures) were also analyzed.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Advantages of osseointegration have been reported to include improved functional mobility, better osseoperception, improved comfort, reduced pain, better biomechanical alignment and gait, which all lead to a less restricted lifestyle and significantly improved quality of life. A major concern of the Osseointegrated approach lies in the risk of infections occurring from the permanent transcutaneous opening often referred to as the stoma. Detailed analysis has been performed on all osseointegration surgeries performed by the Osseointegration Group of Australia and it's affiliates since 2010. All events leading to a re-admission and subsequent re-operation have been identified through hospital operation records and pooled together for meta-analysis. Events identified include: revision of implants, periprosthetic fracture fixation, surgical debridement due to infections, neurectomies and soft- tissue refashioning.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Advances in military surgery have led to significant numbers of soldiers surviving with bilateral above knee amputations. Despite advances in prosthetic design and high quality rehabilitation not all amputees succesfully ambulate. Five patients (10 stumps) with persisting socket fit issues were selected for osseointegration (OI) using a transcutaneous prosthesis with press-fit fixation in the residual femur. Prior to surgery all five were primarily/exclusively wheelchair users. Follow up was from 7 to 25 months (mean 12.2). There were no deaths, episodes of sepsis or osteomyelitis. There was one proximal femoral fracture secondary to a fall. One stump required soft tissue refashioning. Cellulitis needing oral antibiotics occurred in four cases. Functional improvement occurred in all cases with all currently primarily prosthetic users, the majority all day users. Three patients are still completing rehabilitation. Six minute walk tests (SMWT) improved by a mean of 20%. Three are now graded mobility SIGAM F (normal gait) and two SIGAM D-b (limited terrain; with one stick). This cohort suggests that OI may have a role in the treatment of military blast amputees. A larger scale clinical evaluation is planned in the UK blast related amputee population to further establish the benefits and risks of this technique
