Aims

Hip fracture is a common injury in the elderly. Recent studies in orthopaedic access have demonstrated inequities affecting Māori. This study aimed to compare the demographic differences between Māori and NZ Europeans with hip fractures, identify any deficiencies in initial, surgical and post op care and in outcomes.

The New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) was established in 1999. However, ethnicity data was not recorded by prioritisation in line with Ministry of Health (MoH) recommendations. Recently, cross-referencing with MoH updated ethnicity data for all 326,150 entries in the NZJR database. The objective of this national level, population study was to identify any ethnic disparities in access and outcome for Māori for primary total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) for Osteoarthritis.

The utilisation rate for THA and TKAs were calculated for the Māori and NZ European population from all data in the NZJR and Census data in 2001, 2006, 2013 and 2018. Utilisation rate was reported separately for four age groups (<55, 55-64, 65-74, >75) over four time periods (1999-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, 2015-2020). Revision rate, 6 months and 5-year Oxford scores were adjusted for age, sex and BMI, then compared between groups.

In every age group and at all but one time point, significant under-utilisation of TKA was observed in Māori. For THAs, Māori had similar utilisation rates in the <55 and 55-64 age groups, but significantly lower utilisation rates in all other age groups.

When adjusted for age, sex and BMI, no significant differences in revision rates were observed between Māori and NZ Europeans for THAs (HR 0.939, P 0.417) or TKAs (HR 1.129, P 0.149). Adjusted 6 months and 5-year Oxford scores were significantly higher in NZ Europeans, however, the maximum difference was less than 3 points and is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Despite the same risk of being diagnosed with osteoarthritis, Māori are less likely to undergo THA and TKA. There are no clinically significant differences in outcomes post arthroplasty between Māori and NZ Europeans. Further research is required to investigate causes for lower utilisation in Māori.

A long surgical procedure length has been well associated with worse clinical outcomes, also in an economic climate where in the theatre, time is money, surgical procedures are done very rapidly. Few studies have documented the clinical outcomes of procedure speed.

Using the New Zealand Registry we reviewed the operation time of 41,560 primary knee joint replacements. These were split into groups of time slots for the surgery from less than 40 minutes, 40–59, 60–89, 90–119, 120–179 and greater than 180mins. This was referenced to the oxford knee scores obtained and the revision rate.

For operations done in less than 40 or greater than 180 minutes, the oxford knee score was lower by 5 years. The revision rate was also increased in these same groups.

Operations done in greater than 180 minutes are generally the more complex non-osteoarthrtic and tumour cases and have a higher revision rate reflecting their complexity. Procedures done less than 40 minutes are more straight forward, but there is a relationship shown between this speed and revision rate and poorer outcome. The cause is likely multifactorial, but begs the question, does speed kill?

The goal of this study was to determine which of two techniques for the treatment of peri-prosthetic femoral shaft fractures has the greatest torsional integrity. The study designed was a laboratory study, using 13 matched pairs of embalmed femurs. The femurs were implanted with a cemented total hip prosthesis, with a transverse osteotomy distal to the stem. These fractures were fixed either with a metal plate with three proximal unicortical screws and three distal bicortical screws or with three proximal cables and three distal bicortical screws. The fracture fixation was tested to failure in torsion. The pattern of failure and torsional limits were recorded.

There was no significant difference to failure level between the two constructs. Failure with the proximal unicortical screws was usually catastrophic versus non-catastrophic with proximal cables. The femurs were significantly more likely to fracture in internal rotation.

Treatment with proximal cables has the same load to failure in torsion but significantly less complications than with unicortical screws, in agreement with the literature. The findings of the construct being weaker in internal rotation, appears to be a new finding and an area of possible new research.