The localization of necrotic areas has been reported to impact the prognosis and treatment strategy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Anteroposterior localization of the necrotic area after a femoral neck fracture (FNF) has not been properly investigated. We hypothesize that the change of the weight loading direction on the femoral head due to residual posterior tilt caused by malunited FNF may affect the location of ONFH. We investigate the relationship between the posterior tilt angle (PTA) and anteroposterior localization of osteonecrosis using lateral hip radiographs. Patients aged younger than 55 years diagnosed with ONFH after FNF were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 65 hips (38 males and 27 females; mean age 32.6 years (SD 12.2)) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with stage 1 or 4 ONFH, as per the Association Research Circulation Osseous classification, were excluded. The ratios of anterior and posterior viable areas and necrotic areas of the femoral head to the articular surface were calculated by setting the femoral head centre as the reference point. The PTA was measured using Palm’s method. The association between the PTA and viable or necrotic areas of the femoral head was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis (median PTA 6.0° (interquartile range 3 to 11.5)).Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare two different types
of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing for total hip arthroplasty (THA):
one with a large femoral head (38 mm to 52 mm) and the other with
a conventional femoral head (28 mm or 32 mm). We compared clinical
outcome, blood metal ion levels, and the incidence of pseudotumour in
the two groups. Between December 2009 and December 2011, 62 patients underwent
MoM THA with a large femoral head (Magnum group) and 57 patients
an MoM THA with a conventional femoral head (conventional group).
Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip score, University
of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score and EuroQol-5D
(EQ-5D). Blood metal ion levels were measured and MRI scans were
analyzed at a minimum of five years postoperatively.Aims
Patients and Methods
Treatment of the femoral head necrosis with severe extensive collapse in young adults and adolescents are still challenging. We thought preserve the joint and bone stock were important factor for the treatment of femoral head necrosis in young patients. We reviewed the posterior rotational osteotomy for younger patients with severe osteonecrosis. The advantages of posterior rotational osteotomy are; the necrotic area is moved to non-weight bearing portion. The posterior column artery is shifted medially without vascular damage by rotation. Postoperative uncollapsed anterior viable areas are moved to the loaded portion below the acetabular roof in flexed positions. Eighty five hips of 66 young adults (less than 50 years old, mean age; 31 years) with extensive necrosis treated by posterior rotational osteotomy were reviewed with more than 5 year follow up with a mean of 9 years. Results of 13 hips of 12 adolescents (mean age; 14 years) with extensive collapsed necrosis treated by this procedure were also studied with a mean of 6.5 years. A mean degree of posterior rotation was 121. Recollapse was prevented in 77 hips (91%) of adults, and all 13 hips of adolescents on final AP radiographs. Collapsed lesion was remodeled well and resphericity of the postoperative transferred medial collapsed femoral head on final AP radiographs was observed. However, some of the cases were out of indication of the joint preserving procedure showing extensive lesion. In these cases, we performed the MAYO conservative stem for preserving bone stock. Radiological results of 26 hips with osteonecrosis treated by MAYO stem (mean age 42 years, minimum 5 year follow-up. mean; 6.7 years) showed that 2 mm subsidence in one, osteointegration of zone 2, 6 in 93%, no entire lucent line. No hips were revised for late loosening associated with osteolysis. CT imaging indicated that spot welds of zone 2, 6 were found in 100ï¼ï¿½, stress shielding of zone 1, 5 (23.5ï¼ï¿½). These operations were useful particularly for younger patients.