As much as there is interest in mini-invasive surgery (MIS) total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is controversy ranging from a more advantageous to a potentially dangerous alternative to classic THA. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of 130 cementless, standard stem navigated primary THA with data collected retrospectively from 2005 to 2010 (64 classic Hardinge approach (HAL) and 66 MIS intermuscular anterolateral approach by the senior surgeon). Data include: operative time, perioperative bleeding, length of surgery, hospital stay, patient's satisfaction and pain perception. The alignment values at six months to a maximum of 60 months provided necessary statistical information for clinical and radiological comparison of the two groups. Significant differences were found between the two groups with MIS being superior with respect to less surgical time (p = 0.029) and achieving quicker rehab goals with shorter hospital stay (p <0.001). Pain perception was less in MIS group with a higher satisfaction score (p <0.001). Although both groups have the potential of nerve injury to tensor fascia muscle, it's only the classic HAL that jeopardises the glutei nerve supply. MIS approach to navigated THA seems to be an acceptable alternative with some advantages to Classic HAL.
To assess if Osteoset (CaSO4) improves graft incorporation after shelf procedure and whether spica immobilisation is necessary 49 patients with acetabular dysplasia treated by shelf procedure were reviewed retrospectively. Group 1 (19 children) and group 2 (12 adults) had shelf acetabuloplasty using autogenous bone graft and CaSO4. Group 3 (18 children) underwent shelf acetabuloplasty using autogenous bone graft alone. Group 2 was assessed separately to avoid age bias. Within group 3 we compared 10 patients managed in plaster for six weeks with 8 mobilized on crutches post operatively. Total shelf and graft area, total shelf length, extra-osseous shelf length and speed of graft incorporation were measured radiologically. There was no difference in shelf indices between patients treated in plaster and those mobilized on crutches. Use of CaSO4 significantly enlarged shelf volume by 3 months post-operative with less resorption, which was maintained throughout follow-up. In contrast the non-CaSO4 group showed a steady decrease in shelf volume. The extra-osseous shelf length was initially similar in groups 1 & 3. By 6 weeks the group 1 extra-osseous shelf was significantly greater than for group 3 and was maintained throughout follow-up. Graft incorporation was faster in group 1. Shelf area and extra-osseous shelf length improved significantly in group 2. However total shelf length decreased slightly by 6 months.Aim
Methods/results