To evaluate the correlation between the clinical Kirk Watson test and arthroscopic Geissler classification in scapholunate instability. All patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy between April 2006 and April 2010 were evaluated. Patients were included in the study if they had a Kirk Watson test and a wrist arthroscopy with an assessment of the stability of the scapholunate joint using the Geissler classification. Patients who had a Kirk Watson test performed with subsequent normal scapholunate joint at arthroscopy were included as a control group. Geissler grades 1 and 2 and grades 3 and 4 were grouped for further analysis into low and high grade instability groups respectively.Aim
Methods
It has been postulated that a mild clubfoot does better than a severe clubfoot no matter what treatment course is taken. There have been previous efforts to classify clubfoot. For units worldwide that use the Ponseti Method of clubfoot management, the Pirani scoring system is widely used. This scoring system has previously been shown to predict the number of plasters required to gain correction. Our study aimed to investigate whether the Pirani score gave an indication of longer-term outcome using tibialis anterior tendon transfer as an endpoint. A prospectively collated database was used to identify all patients treated in the Ponseti clinic at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital between 2002 and 2005 with idiopathic clubfoot who had not received any treatment prior to their referral. Rate of tibialis tendon transfer as well as the patient's presenting Pirani score were noted. Feet were grouped for analytical purposes into a mild clubfoot (Pirani score <4) and a severe clubfoot (Pirani score 4) category depending on initial examination. Clinic records were reviewed retrospectively to identify patients who were poorly compliant at wearing boots and bars and were categorised into having “good” or “bad” compliance with orthosis use.Introduction
Methods
