Aims

The purpose of this study was to review a large cohort of patients and further assess the correlation between the histological response to chemotherapy in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma with the overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS).

We aimed to identify the incidence, outcome and prognostic factors associated with spindle cell sarcomas of bone (SCSB). We studied 196 patients with a primary non-metastatic tumour treated with the intent to cure. The results were compared with those of osteosarcoma patients treated at our hospital during the same period. The overall incidence of SCSB was 7.8% of all patients with a primary bone sarcoma. The five- and ten-year survival rates were 67.0% and 60.0%, respectively, which were better than those of patients with osteosarcoma treated over the same period. All histological subtypes had similar outcomes. On univariate analysis, factors that were significantly associated with decreased survival were age > 40 years, size > 8 cm, the presence of a pathological fracture, amputation, involved margins and a poor response to pre-operative chemotherapy. Multivariate analyses showed that age > 65 years, amputation and involved margins were all statistically significant prognostic factors. Involved margins and poor response to pre-operative chemotherapy were associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. SCSB has a better prognosis than osteosarcoma when matched for age. Most prognostic factors for osteosarcoma also seem to apply to SCSB. Patients with SCSB should be treated in the same way as patients of the same age with osteosarcoma.

The aim of this study was to identify whether there was any difference in patient, tumour, treatment or outcome characteristics between patients with skeletal or extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcoma. We identified 300 patients with new primary Ewing’s sarcoma diagnosed between 1980 and 2005 from the centres’ local database. There were 253 (84%) with skeletal and 47 (16%) with extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcomas. Although patients with skeletal Ewing’s were younger (mean age 16.8 years) than those with extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcoma (mean age 27.5 years), there was little difference between the groups in terms of tumour stage or treatment. Nearly all the patients were treated with chemotherapy and most had surgery. There was no difference in the overall survival of patients with skeletal (64%) and extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcoma (61%) (p = 0.85), and this was also the case when both groups were split by whether they had metastases or not.

This large series has shown that the oncological outcomes of Ewing’s sarcoma are related to tumour characteristics and patient age, and not determined by whether they arise in bone or soft tissue.

Of 3000 patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumours and treated at our unit over the past 25 years, 234 (7.8%) were considered to be spindle cell sarcomas of bone (ie not osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing’s, chordoma or adamantinoma). We have analyzed their management and outcomes.

The diagnosis of these cases varied with fluctuations in the popularity of conditions such as MFH, fibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma with the passage of time. Treatment was with chemotherapy and surgery whenever possible. 36 patients had metastases at diagnosis and 17 had palliative treatment only because of age or infirmity. The most common site was the femur followed by the tibia, pelvis and humerus. The mean age was 45 and the mean tumour size 10.2cm at diagnosis. 25% of patients presented with a pathological fracture. Chemotherapy was used in 70% of patients the most common regime being cisplatin and doxorubicin. 35% of patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a good (> 90% necrosis) response. The amputation rate was 22% and was higher in patients presenting with a fracture and in older patients not having chemotherapy.

With a mean follow up of 8 years the overall survival was 64% at 5 yrs and 58% at 10 yrs. Adverse prognostic factors included the need for amputation, older age and poor response to chemotherapy as well as a pathological fracture at presentation. The few patients with angiosarcoma fared badly but there was no difference in outcomes between patients with other diagnoses.

We conclude that patients with spindle cell sarcomas should be treated similarly to patients with osteosarcoma and can expect comparable outcomes. The histological diagnosis does not appear to predict behaviour.

Of 3000 patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumours and treated at our unit over the past 25 years, 234 (7.8%) were considered to be spindle cell sarcomas of bone (ie not osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing’s, chordoma or adamantinoma). We have analyzed their management and outcomes.

The diagnosis of these cases varied with fluctuations in the popularity of conditions such as MFH, fibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma with the passage of time. Treatment was with chemotherapy and surgery whenever possible. 36 patients had metastases at diagnosis and 17 had palliative treatment only because of age or infirmity. The most common site was the femur followed by the tibia, pelvis and humerus. The mean age was 45 and the mean tumour size 10.2cm at diagnosis. 25% of patients presented with a pathological fracture. Chemotherapy was used in 70% of patients the most common regime being cisplatin and doxorubicin. 35% of patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a good (> 90% necrosis) response. The amputation rate was 22% and was higher in patients presenting with a fracture and in older patients not having chemotherapy.

With a mean follow up of 8 years the overall survival was 64% at 5 yrs and 58% at 10 yrs. Adverse prognostic factors included the need for amputation, older age and poor response to chemotherapy as well as a pathological fracture at presentation. The few patients with angiosarcoma fared badly but there was no difference in outcomes between patients with other diagnoses.

We conclude that patients with spindle cell sarcomas should be treated similarly to patients with osteosarcoma and can expect comparable outcomes. The histological diagnosis does not appear to predict behaviour.

We have investigated the oncological outcome of 63 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas of the hand managed at three major centres in the United Kingdom. There were 44 males and 19 females with a mean age of 45 years (11 to 92). The three most common diagnoses were synovial sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and epithelioid sarcoma. Local excision was carried out in 45 patients (71%) and amputation in 18 (29%). All those treated by amputation had a wide margin of excision but this was only achieved in 58% of those treated by local excision. The risk of local recurrence was 6% in those treated by amputation compared with 42% for those who underwent attempted limb salvage. An inadequate margin of excision resulted in a 12 times greater risk of local recurrence when compared with those in whom a wide margin of excision had been achieved. We were unable to demonstrate any role for radiotherapy in decreasing the risk of local recurrence when there was an inadequate margin of excision. Patients with an inadequate margin of excision had a much higher risk of both local recurrence and metastasis than those with wide margins. The overall survival rate at five years was 87% and was related to the grade and size of the tumour and to the surgical margin.

We have shown that a clear margin of excision is essential to achieve local control of a soft-tissue sarcoma in the hand and that failure to achieve this results in a high risk of both local recurrence and metastastic disease.

We have investigated the significance of the method of treatment on the oncological and functional outcomes and on the complications in 184 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas of the adductor compartment managed at three international centres. The overall survival at five years was 65% and was related to the grade at diagnosis and the size of the tumour. There was no difference in overall survival between the three centres. There was, however, a significant difference in local control with a rate of 28% in Centre 1 compared with 10% in Centre 2 and 5% in Centre 3.

The overall mean functional score using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score in 70 patients was 77% but was significantly worse in patients with wound complications or high-grade tumours. The scores were not affected by the timing of radiotherapy or the use of muscle flaps.

This large series of soft-tissue sarcomas of the adductor compartment has shown that factors influencing survival do not vary across the international boundaries studied, but that methods of treatment affect complications, local recurrence and function.

Local recurrence (LR) following treatment of a sarcoma is generally accepted to be a poor prognostic sign and an indicator both of inadequate local control as well as of the failure of adjuvant treatment.

Of 2589 patients with non metastatic Ewings, osteo-sarcoma, chondrosarcoma or a soft tissue sarcoma, 316 have developed LR at some stage following initial treatment of their tumour. 120 were already known to have metastases elsewhere when they developed LR or were found to have them at time of restaging but 196 developed LR as the first sign of relapse.

The mean time to development of LR was 24 months and 72% had arisen within the first two years. Overall survival following LR was 25% at 5 years and 20% at 10 yrs. In patients with metastases at the time of LR or who were found to have them at the time of restaging the median survival was 6 months with only 12% being alive at 2 years. In those with LR as first sign of relapse median survival was 3 years with 30% long term survivors. Patients with low grade tumours had a better outcome than those with high grade – 50% being cured by further surgery. Of the high grade tumours without metastases at time of diagnosis relapsed Ewing’s had the worst prognosis with median survival of 8 months compared with 22 months for osteosarcoma, 36 months for STS and 36 months for chondrosarcoma, despite which overall survival was 16% for both Ewing’s and osteo-sarcoma patients but was 30% for chondrosarcoma and STS.

LR following sarcoma surgery is due to a combination of aggressive disease with inadequate surgery and ineffective adjuvant treatment. In isolated LR aggressive further treatment is justified with an outcome similar to that of metastatic disease.