Our understanding of pre-arthritic hip disease has evolved tremendously but challenges remain in categorizing diagnosis, which ultimately impacts choice of treatments and clinical outcomes. This study aims to report patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing four different condition groups within hip preservation surgery by a group of fellowship-trained surgeons. From 2018 to 2021, 380 patients underwent hip preservation surgery at our center and were classified into five condition groups: Arthroscopy (75.5%) was the most common procedure followed by peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) (22.4%) and surgical dislocation (2.1%). Re-operation rate were respectively 18.3% (15), 5.8% (10), 4.9% (5), 30% (6) and 0%. There were 36 re-operations in the cohort, 14 (39%) for unintended consequences of initial surgery, 10 (28%) for mal-correction leading to a repeat operation, 8 (22%) progression of arthritis, and 4 (11%) for incorrect initial diagnosis/intervention. Most common re-operations were hardware removal 31% (7 PAO, 3 surgical hip dislocation and 1 femoral de-rotational osteotomy), arthroscopy 31% (11) and arthroplasty 28% (10). All groups had significant improvements in their IHOT-12 as well as PROMIS physical and numerical pain scales, except those with failed hip preservation. Dysplasia group showed a slower recovery. Overall, this study demonstrated a clear relation between the condition groups, their respective intervention and the significant improvements in PROMs with isolated labral pathology being a valid diagnosis. Establishing tertiary referral centers for hip preservation and longer follow-up is needed to monitor the overall survivorship of these various procedures.
The gold standard treatment of hip dysplasia is a peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO). Labral tears are seen in the majority of patients presenting with hip dysplasia and diagnosed using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The goal was to (1) evaluate utility/value of MRI in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at time of PAO, and (2) determine whether MRI findings of labral pathology can predict outcome. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at tertiary institutions, comparing patients with hip dysplasia treated with isolated PAO versus PAO with adjunct hip arthroscopy. This study was a subgroup analysis on 74 patients allocated to PAO and adjunct hip arthroscopy (age 26±8 years; 89.2% females). All patients underwent radiographic and MRI assessment using a 1.5-Tesla with or 3-Tesla MRI without arthrography to detect labral or cartilage pathology. Clinical outcome was assessed using international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT). 74% of patients (55/74) were pre-operatively diagnosed with a labral tear on MRI. Among these, 41 underwent labral treatment (74%); whilst among those without a labral tear on MRI, 42% underwent labral treatment (8/19). MRI had a high sensitivity (84%), but a low specificity (56%) for labral pathology (p=0.053). There was no difference in pre-operative (31.3±16.0 vs. 37.3±14.9; p=0.123) and post-operative iHOT (77.7±22.2 vs. 75.2±23.5; p=0.676) between patients with and without labral pathology on MRI. Value of MRI in the diagnostic work-up of a patient with hip dysplasia is limited. MRI had a high sensitivity (84%), but low specificity (44%) to identify labral pathology in patients with hip dysplasia. Consequently, standard clinical MRI had little value as a predictor of outcome with no differences in PROM scores between patients with and without a labral tear on MRI. Treatment of labral pathology in patients with hip dysplasia remains controversial. The results of this subgroup analysis of a prospective, multi-centre RCT do not show improved outcome among patients with dysplasia treated with labral repair.
The aim of the current study was to assess the reliability of the Ottawa classification for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. In all, 134 consecutive hips that underwent periacetabular osteotomy were categorized using a validated software (Hip2Norm) into four categories of normal, lateral/global, anterior, or posterior. A total of 74 cases were selected for reliability analysis, and these included 44 dysplastic and 30 normal hips. A group of six blinded fellowship-trained raters, provided with the classification system, looked at these radiographs at two separate timepoints to classify the hips using standard radiological measurements. Thereafter, a consensus meeting was held where a modified flow diagram was devised, before a third reading by four raters using a separate set of 74 radiographs took place.Aims
Methods
Hip dysplasia has traditionally been classified based on the lateral center edge angle (LCEA). A recent meta-analysis demonstrated no definite consensus and a significant heterogeneity in LCEA values used in various studies to define hip dysplasia and borderline dysplasia. To overcome the shortcomings of classifying hip dysplasia based on just LCEA, a comprehensive classification for adult acetabular dysplasia (CCAD) was proposed to classify symptomatic hips into three discrete prototypical patterns of hip instability; lateral/global, anterior, or posterior. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of this recently published CCAD. One hundred thirty-four consecutive hips that underwent a PAO were categorized using a validated software (Hip2Norm) into four categories of normal, lateral/global, anterior or posterior. Based on the prevalence of individual dysplasia and using KappaSize R package version 1.1, seventy-four cases were necessary for reliability analysis: 44 dysplastic and 30 normal hips were randomly selected. Five surgeons (3 fellowship trained in hip preservation) did a first reading (Time 1) to classify the hips, followed by four raters for a second reading (Time 2) minimum two weeks apart. Thereafter, a consensus meeting was held where a simplified flow diagram was devised before a third reading by four raters using a separate set of 74 radiographs took place.Background
Methods
What represents clinically significant acetabular undercoverage
in patients with symptomatic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement
(FAI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine
the influence of the degree of acetabular coverage on the functional
outcome of patients treated arthroscopically for cam-type FAI. Between October 2005 and June 2016, 88 patients (97 hips) underwent
arthroscopic cam resection and concomitant labral debridement and/or
refixation. There were 57 male and 31 female patients with a mean
age of 31.0 years (17.0 to 48.5) and a mean body mass index (BMI)
of 25.4 kg/m2 (18.9 to 34.9). We used the Hip2Norm, an
object-oriented-platform program, to perform 3D analysis of hip
joint morphology using 2D anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. The lateral
centre-edge angle, anterior coverage, posterior coverage, total
femoral coverage, and alpha angle were measured for each hip. The
presence or absence of crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and
the value of acetabular retroversion index were identified automatically
by Hip2Norm. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected preoperatively
and at final follow-up with the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (HOOS).Aims
Patients and Methods
The current study aimed to determine the influence of acetabular coverage and intraarticular pathology on post-operative functional outcomes of arthroscopy for cam type FAI. Based on 762 hip scopes performed by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2016, we excluded patients with previous surgery on the hip, mixed FAI, surgical hip dislocation, and missing outcome scores. From this, 97 hips between the ages 17 and 48 that underwent arthroscopy for cam deformity were identified for analysis. Every patient received a partial capsulotomy, cam resection and either labral repair or resection. Measurements for acetabular coverage consisted of pre-operative lateral edge angle (LCEA) (mean 30°, range: 15.4°–40°) and three-dimensional anterior and posterior acetabular coverages. Intraoperative Beck scores were acquired from operative reports, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was collected pre- and post-operatively. Significant post-operative improvement was found in scores of all categories of the HOOS (p < 0.05). However, improvement in HOOS was not correlated with the LCEA, anterior coverage, or posterior coverage. There was a trend toward lower Beck grades (1–3) resulting in better HOOS outcomes than higher Beck grades (4–5). Also, lower Beck grades showed significantly lower alpha angle (mean = 55.86) than higher grades (mean = 73.48). We showed that cam FAI arthroscopic resection improved patient outcome, and confirmed the relationship between the Beck score and functional outcome. However, functional improvement was not related to acetabular coverage suggesting that the so-called “borderline” dysplasia is not a useful radiographic indicator for surgical management.
