The presence of metastatic bone disease (MBD) often necessitates major orthopaedic surgery. Patients will enter surgical care either through emergent or electively scheduled care pathways. Patients in a pain crisis or with an acute fracture are generally admitted via emergent care pathways whereas patients with identified high-risk bone lesions are often booked for urgent yet scheduled elective procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the post-operative outcomes of patients who present through emergent or electively scheduled care pathways in patients in a Canadian health care system.

We have conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of all patients presenting for surgery for MBD of the femur, humerus, tibia or pelvis in southern Alberta between 2006 and 2021. Patients were identified by a search query of all patients with a diagnosis of metastatic cancer who underwent surgery for an impending or actual pathologic fracture in the Calgary, South and Central Alberta Zones. Subsequent chart reviews were performed. Emergent surgeries were defined by patients admitted to hospital via urgent care mechanisms and managed via unscheduled surgical bookings (“on call list”). Elective surgeries were defined by patients seen by an orthopaedic surgeon at least once prior to surgery, and booked for a scheduled urgent, yet elective procedure. Outcomes include overall survival from the time of surgery, hospital length of stay, and 30-day hospital readmission rate.

We have identified 402 patients to date for inclusion. 273 patients (67.9%) underwent surgery through emergent pathways and 129 patients (32.1%) were treated through urgent, electively scheduled pathways. Lung, prostate, renal cell, and breast cancer were the most common primary malignancies and there was no significant difference in these primaries amongst the groups (p=0.06). Not surprisingly, emergent patients were more likely to be treated for a pathologic fracture (p<0.001) whereas elective patients were more likely to be treated for an impending fracture (p<0.001). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the emergent group (5.0 months, 95%CI: 4.0-6.1) compared to the elective group (14.9 months 95%CI: 10.4-24.6) [p<0.001]. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the emergent group (13 days, 95%CI: 12-16 versus 5 days, 95%CI: 5-7 days). There was a significantly greater rate of 30-day hospital readmission in the emergent group (13.3% versus 7.8%) [p=0.01].

Electively managed MBD has multiple benefits including longer post-operative survival, shorter length of hospital stay, and a lower rate of 30-day hospital readmission. These findings from a Canadian healthcare system demonstrate clinical value in providing elective orthopaedic care when possible for patients with MBD. Furthermore, care delivery interventions capable of decreasing the footprint of emergent surgery through enhanced screening or follow-up of patients with MBD has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes in this population. This is an ongoing study that will justify refinements to the current surgical care pathways for MBD in order to identify patients prior to emergent presentation. Future directions will evaluate the costs associated with each care delivery method to provide opportunity for health economic efficiencies.

Metastatic bone disease (MBD) is a significant contributor to diminished quality of life in cancer patients, often leading to pathologic fractures, hypercalcaemia, intractable bone pain, and reduced functional independence. Standard of care management for MBD patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery is multi-disciplinary, includes regular surgical follow-up, case by case assessment for use of bone protective medications, and post-operative radiation therapy to the operative site. The number of patients in southern Alberta receiving standard of care post-operative management is currently unclear. Our aim is to develop a database of all patients in southern Alberta undergoing orthopaedic surgery for MBD and to assess for deficiencies and opportunities to ensure standard of care for this complex patient population.

Patients were identified for database inclusion by a search query of the Alberta Cancer Registry of all patients with a diagnosis of metastatic cancer who underwent surgery for an impending or pathologic fracture in the Calgary, South and Central Alberta Zones. Demographic information, primary cancer history, previous local and systemic treatments, anatomical location of MBD event(s), surgical fixation techniques, and post-operative care details were collected. The rate of standard of care post-operative treatment was evaluated. A comparison of outcomes between tertiary urban centres and rural centres was also completed. Survival was calculated from time of first operation to date of death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the impact of post-operative care variables on survival amongst patients surviving longer than one month.

We identified 402 patients who have undergone surgical treatment for MBD in southern Alberta from 2006-2018. Median age at time of surgery was 66.3 years and 52.7% of patients were female. Breast, lung, prostate, renal cell and multiple myeloma were the most common primary malignancies (n=328, 81.6%). Median post-operative survival was 6.8 months (95%CI: 5.7-8.3). 203 patients (52.5%) were treated with post-operative radiotherapy and 159 patients (50.8%) had post-operative surgical follow-up. Only 39 patients (11.3%) received bone protective agents in the peri-operative period. On multivariate survival analysis, post-operative surgical follow-up was associated with improved survival (p<0.001). Patients were treated at nine hospitals across southern Alberta with most patients treated in an urban center (65.9%). Post-operative survival was significantly longer amongst patients treated in an urban center (9.0 months, 95%CI: 6.9-12.3 versus 4.3 months, 95%CI: 3.4-5.6, p<0.001).

The burden of MBD is significant and increasing. With treatment occurring at multiple provincial sites, there is a need for standardized, primary disease-specific peri- and post-operative protocols to ensure quality and efficacious patient care. To provide evidence informed treatment recommendations, we have developed a database of all patients in southern Alberta undergoing orthopaedic surgery for MBD. Our results demonstrate that many patients were not treated according to post-operative standard of care recommendations. Notably, half of the included patients did not have documented surgical follow-up, post-operative radiation treatment was low and only 11% were actively treated with bone protective agents. This data justifies the need for established surgical MBD care pathways and provides reference data to benchmark prospective QA and QI outcomes in this patient population.

The burden of metastatic bone disease (MBD) in our Canadian cancer population continues to increase. MBD has a significant effect on patient morbidity, mortality, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There are various technical options used to surgically stabilize MBD lesions, surgical decision-making is variable and largely dependent on anatomic and surgeon-based factors. There is a paucity of research examining how surgical decision-making for MBD can be modified or individualized to improve quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes, while more accurately aligning with patient-reported goals and expectations. The objective of this study was tosurvey MBD patients, support persons, physicians, and allied health care providers (HCP) with the goal of identifying 1) important contributors to HRQOL, 2) discordance in peri-operative expectations, and 3) perceived measures of success in the surgical management of MBD.

This project is a longitudinal patient-engaged research initiative in MBD. A survey was developed based on HRQOL themes in the literature and based on feedback from our patient research partners. Participants were asked to identify 1) important contributors to HRQOL and 2) perceived measures of success relevant to the surgical management of MBD. Participants were asked to rank themes from ‘extremely important’ to ‘not important at all’. Using open-ended questions, participants were asked to identify areas of improvement. Responses from the open-ended questions were analyzed by an experienced qualitative researcher using conventional content analysis. Participant's demographics were calculated using descriptive statistics. Concordance or discordance of perceived measure of success was assessed via a Chi-Square test of independence. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS® software.

Nine patients, seven support persons, 23 orthopaedic surgeons, 11 medical oncologists, 16 radiation oncologists, 16 nurses, and eight physiotherapists completed the survey. Regarding perceived measures of success, increased life expectancy (p Two main themes emerged around the timeliness of surgical care and the coordination of multidisciplinary care from patients and support persons. Patients and support persons expressed a sense of urgency in progressing to surgery/treatment, and frustration at perceived delays in treatment. Within coordination of care, patients and support persons would like clearer communication from the health care team.

There is discordance between patient/support person goals compared to physicians/HCP goals in the surgical management of MBD. Surgical decision-making and operative techniques that minimize disease progression and improve survival are important to MBD patients. Timely access to surgery/surgical consultation and improved multidisciplinary communication is important to patients. This data suggests improved peri-operative communication and education is needed for MBD patients. Furthermore, future research evaluating how modern orthopaedic surgical techniques influence survival and disease progression in MBD is highly relevant and important to patients with MBD.

Tibial plateau fractures are common injuries. Displaced fractures are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Goals of treatment include restoration of extremity axial alignment, joint stability and congruity, allowing for early motion and prevention of osteoarthritis. Short term results of surgical fixation of tibial plateau fractures are good, however, longer term outcomes have demonstrated a higher risk of end-stage arthritis and total knee arthroplasty. Despite the vast literature around tibial plateau fractures, to our knowledge there are no series examining post-operative reductions using axial imaging. It is our goal to define the incidence of articular malreductions following surgical fixation of tibial plateau fractures, to identify patient or surgeon factors associated with malreductions, and to define any regional patterns of malreduction location.

De-identified post operative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to identify tibial plateau malreductions with a step or gap greater than 2 mm, or condylar width greater than 5 mm. Three independent assessors reviewed the scans meeting criteria using Osirix DICOM software. Steps and gaps were mapped onto the axial sequence at the level of the joint line. Images were then matched to side and overlaid as best fit in Photoshop software to create a map of malreductions. A grid was created to divide the medial and lateral plateaus into quadrants to identify the density of malreductions by location. A multi-variate regression model was used to assess risk factors for malreduction.

Sixty five post-operative CT scans were reviewed. Twenty one reductions had a step or gap more than 2 mm for a malreduction incidence of 32.3%. The incidence in patients undergoing submeniscal arthrotomy or fluoroscopic assisted reduction was 16.6% and 41.4%, respectively (p <0.001). Side of injury, age, BMI, AO fracture type, and use of locking plates were not predictive of malreduction. Malreductions were heavily weighted to the posterior lateral tibial plateau.

The incidence of articular malreductions was high at 32.3%. Fluoroscopic reduction alone was a predictor for articular malreduction with most malreductions located in the posterior lateral quadrants of the plateau.

Patients undergoing Joint Arthroplasty received a significant proportion of blood transfusions. In this study, we compared the risk of Deep Infection, and Superficial Infection post operation following Primary Total Hip or Knee replacement in blood-transfused and non-blood-transfused patients.

Cohort of patients who underwent primary total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty from April 2012 to March 2015 in Alberta. Patient characteristics, comorbidity, received blood transfusion were collected from electronic medical records, operating room information systems, discharge abstract database, provincial clinical risk grouper data. Deep Infection and Superficial Infection were captured from Provincial Surgical Site Infection Surveillance data. Deep Infection include deep incisional and organ/space infections. Logistic regression analysis were used to compare Deep Infection and Superficial Infection in blood-transfused and non-blood-transfused cohorts, and risk-adjusted for age, gender, procedure type, and co-morbidities.

Our study cohort contains 27891 patients, with mean of age at admission was 66.3±10.4, 57.5% female, 49.3% had 1 or more comorbidities. 58.8% underwent Knee Replacement. 11.1% received blood transfusion during hospital stay (Total Hip Replacement (THR) =13.1% and Total Knee Replacement (TKR) =9.7%,). 1.1% had Deep Infection (THR=1.4% and TKR=0.9%) and 0.5% had Superficial Infection (THR=0.5% and TKR=0.5%). Blood-transfused patients got 1.7% Deep Infection and 1.0% Superficial infection. Non-blood-transfused patients got 1.0% Deep Infection and 0.5% Superficial infection. Controlling for age, gender, procedure type, and co-morbidities, the odds of Deep Infection were 1.6 times higher for blood-transfused patients than for non-blood-transfused patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.2–2.2], p=0.004). The odds of Superficial Infection were 2.0 times higher for transfused patients (adjusted OR=2.0, 95% CI [1.3–3.0], p=0.002).

Blood transfusion increases Deep Infection and Superficial Infection post-surgery following Primary Total Knee or Hip Replacement. This finding suggests to reduce the unnecessary blood transfusion for patients considering Joint Arthroplasty. Reducing the blood transfusion will save the inpatient cost and decrease the infective complications post-surgery in Hip or Knee Arthroplasty patients.