In the time since Letournel popularised the surgical
treatment of acetabular fractures, more than 25 years ago, there
have been many changes within the field, related to patients, surgical
technique, implants and post-operative care. However, the long-term
outcomes appear largely unchanged. Does this represent stasis or
have the advances been mitigated by other negative factors? In this
article we have attempted to document the recent changes within
the surgery of patients with a fracture involving the acetabulum,
outline contemporary management, and identify the major problem
areas where further research is most needed. Cite this article:
The increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in
an ageing population has contributed to older patients becoming
the fastest-growing group presenting with acetabular fractures.
We performed a systematic review of the literature involving a number
of databases to identify studies that included the treatment outcome
of acetabular fractures in patients aged >
55 years. An initial
search identified 61 studies; after exclusion by two independent
reviewers, 15 studies were considered to meet the inclusion criteria.
All were case series. The mean Coleman score for methodological
quality assessment was 37 (25 to 49). There were 415 fractures in
414 patients. Pooled analysis revealed a mean age of 71.8 years
(55 to 96) and a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (1 to 210). In seven
studies the results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)
were presented: this was combined with simultaneous hip replacement
(THR) in four, and one study had a mixture of these strategies.
The results of percutaneous fixation were presented in two studies,
and a single study revealed the results of non-operative treatment. With fixation of the fracture, the overall mean rate of conversion
to THR was 23.1% (0% to 45.5%). The mean rate of non-fatal complications
was 39.8% (0% to 64%), and the mean mortality rate was 19.1% (5%
to 50%) at a mean of 64 months (95% confidence interval 59.4 to
68.6; range 12 to 143). Further data dealing with the classification
of the fracture, the surgical approach used, operative time, blood
loss, functional and radiological outcomes were also analysed. This study highlights that, of the many forms of treatment available
for this group of patients, there is a trend to higher complication
rates and the need for further surgery compared with the results
of the treatment of acetabular fractures in younger patients. Cite this article:
It has been shown that a cognitive function (CF) loss can occur after hip or knee arthroplasty procedures, with an incidence of 40 to 70%. The pathogenesis remains unclear but studies suggest some form of brain emboli; although both trans-cranial doppler and trans-oesophageal doppler have both shown emboli per-operatively a correlation has never been shown with CF loss post-operatively. In contrast, in the cardiothoracic literature an embolic cause is widely accepted for detectable post-operative CF drop. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether MRI could show evidence of embolic phenomena in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Twenty-five patients presenting for hip or knee arthroplasty procedures were consented for this study. Brain MRI scans and MR angiograms were performed 1 week pre-operatively and within 1 week post-operatively using a Phillips 1.5Tesla MRI unit. All scans recorded were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. A series of tests to examine several modes of cognitive function were carried out by a clinical psychologist pre-operatively, and at 1 week post-operatively. The CF tests showed a clinically significant drop following surgery in 64% of cases – this is in keeping with other recently published data. None of the post-operative scans or angiograms showed overt evidence of new lesions. Three Scans had equivocal tiny brainstem hypodensities on a single slice with no correlating abnormality on diffusion images to support the presence of new ischaemia. We conclude that either the aetiology of post-operative CF drop following arthroplasty is not embolic in nature, or that with current technology MRI brain scans even with angiograms are not sensitive enough to show the corresponding abnormality. With currently available equipment there appears to be no benefit from using MRI as a tool to evaluate post-operative CF loss in this group of patients.
Ankle arthrodesis is an accepted method of treatment for severe ankle pathology but no single method is universally successful. Compression is usually applied across the ankle joint and maintained with either internal or external fixation; both are associated with complications like infection, non-union, and pain.
We present our results and describe the surgical technique in managing 21 difficult cases using fine wire external frames in the salvage of severe ankle pathology. Nine cases were non-unions following internal fixation of distal tibial intra-articular fractures, seven were patients in whom two or three previous attempts at arthrodesis had been unsuccessful, and five patients had severe degenerative osteo-arthritis of the ankle joint.
A sound arthrodesis was achieved in 19 out of 21 cases giving a union rate of 90.4%. The median period of fixation was 21 weeks, followed by a mean period of cast immobilisation of eight weeks. All except three developed pin site inflammation. Using Mazur’s functional ankle score there were twelve good results, five fair, two poor and two failures.
A fusion rate of 90.4% was achieved using this method. We recommend it for the salvage of failed arthrodesis or severe fracture non-union, particularly in the presence of infection.
Osteotomies are commonly carried out in orthopaedic surgery, particularly in limb reconstruction. Complications are uncommon provided that sufficient care is taken and a sound technique used. We describe three cases of formation of false aneurysm after osteotomy, with acute, delayed and asymptomatic onset. The diagnosis was supported by ultrasound investigation, and confirmed by angiography. Embolisation with coils was a successful method of treatment. We recommend a safe method of osteotomy with good bone exposure and adequate soft-tissue protection.
