Extraction of implants due to periprosthetic infection (PJI) following complex revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with extensive hardware can be a daunting undertaking for surgeon and patient alike. We question whether irrigation and debridement (I&D) has a role in this difficult situation with respect to infection control, reoperation, and function. rTKAs for PJI from 2005–2016 were reviewed. Extensive hardware was defined as: metaphyseal cone/sleeve fixation, distal femoral replacement, periprosthetic fracture hardware, or stems >75mm. Cases were categorized by treatment (I&D or 2-stage exchange).Introduction
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid- modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1 years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.
