Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 96 - 96
1 Apr 2019
Lazennec JY Rischke B Rakover JP Ricart O Rousseau MA
Full Access

Introduction

The viscoelastic cervical disk prosthesis CP-ESP is an innovative one-piece deformable but cohesive interbody spacer. It is an evolution of the LP-ESP lumbar disk implanted since 2006. The implant provides 6 full degrees of freedom including shock absorption. The design allows a limitation for rotation and translation with resistance to motion (elastic return property) aimed at avoiding overload of the posterior facets. The rotation center can vary freely during motion. It thus differs substantially from current prostheses.

This study reports the clinical results of a prospective observational study series of 89 patients who are representative of the current use of the ESP implant since 2012.

The radiological results are focused on the evolution of the mean center of rotation (MCR) as an additional information to the range of motion (ROM) for the evaluation of the quality of spine movement.

Materials and Methods

89 patients (33 males, mean age 45 years [28–60], 107 implants) were included for an open, prospective and non-randomized study between October 2012 and December 2015.

One level patients were at C3C4 (3), C4C5 (3), C5C6 (41) C6C7 (24) C7T1 (1)

Two levels patients were C4C5/C5C6 (3), C5C6/C6C7 (12), C6C7/C7D1 (1) and 3 levels C4C5/C5C6/C6C7 (1)


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 103 - 103
1 Sep 2012
Ede MN Ross E Rischke B Joellenbeck B Hipp J Kari Z
Full Access

Purpose

To determine if clinical outcomes are correlated with center of rotation (COR) in patients implanted with a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR).

Methods

Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar DDD between L4 and S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial of a VTDR across three surgical centres. A comprehensive, independent review and statistical analysis of both clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed and analyzed for correlations. Data from preoperative through 2 years were available. The COR was calculated for the index levels and compared to data for an asymptomatic population. Each COR coordinate was classified as abnormal if outside of the 95% confidence interval for an asymptomatic population.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 11 - 11
1 Jun 2012
Newton Ede M Ross ERS Rischke B Joellenbeck B Hipp J Zimmers K
Full Access

Purpose

To determine if clinical outcomes are correlated with center of rotation (COR) in patients implanted with a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR).

Methods

Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar DDD between L4 and S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial of a VTDR across three surgical centres. A comprehensive, independent review and statistical analysis of both clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed and analyzed for correlations. Data from preoperative through 2 years were available. The COR was calculated for the index levels and compared to data for an asymptomatic population. Each COR coordinate was classified as abnormal if outside of the 95% confidence interval for an asymptomatic population.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 59 - 59
1 Apr 2012
Ross E Rischke B Joellenbeck B
Full Access

Surgical management of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) currently consists of fusion or implantation of a first generation total disc replacement (TDR). This study is the first to evaluate an elastomeric one-piece TDR in a 50-patient European study.

Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar DDD at L4-S1 who were unresponsive to at least 6-months of non-operative therapy were enrolled in a clinical trial of a viscoelastic TDR (VTDR) at three European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 2 years. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess clinical outcomes.

Twenty-eight males and twenty-two females were enrolled in the study. The average age of patients was 39.7 (23 to 61). The operative level was L4/L5 in 13 patients and L5/S1 in 37 patients. There were no intra-operative complications. Quantitative radiographic assessment indicates that the VTDR restores and maintains a physiologically appropriate disc height and angle, while providing range of motion and translation similar to those provided by the natural disc. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% pre-operatively to 25% at two years follow up. Mean VAS low back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm pre-op to 3 cm at two years. Median scores indicate that half of the patient population has ODI scores below 13% and VAS back pain scores below 0.5 cm. Clinically and radiologically, this elastomeric disc is performing satisfactorily, and the causes of clinical failures can be more readily identified.