Hip instability is one of the most common causes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision surgery. Studies have indicated that lumbar fusion (LF) surgery is a risk factor for hip dislocation. Instrumented spine fusion surgery decreases pelvic tilt, which might lead to an increase in hip motion to accommodate this postural change. To the best of our knowledge, spine-pelvis-hip kinematics during a dynamic activity in patients that previously had both a THA and LF have not been investigated. Furthermore, patients with a combined THA and LF tend to have greater disability. The purpose was to examine spine-pelvis-hip kinematics during a sit to stand task in patients that have had both THA and LF surgeries and compare it to a group of patients that had a THA with no history of spine surgery. The secondary purpose was to compare pain, physical function, and disability between these patients.

This cross-sectional study recruited participants that had a combined THA and LF (n=10; 6 females, mean age 73 y) or had a THA only (n=11; 6 females, mean age 72 y). Spine, pelvis, and hip angles were measured using a TrakSTAR motion capture system sampled at 200 Hz. Sensors were mounted over the lateral thighs, base of the sacrum, and the spinous process of the third lumbar,12th thoracic, and ninth thoracic vertebrae. Participants completed 10 trials of a standardized sit-to-stand-to-sit task. Hip, pelvis, lower lumbar, upper lumbar, and lower thoracic sagittal joint angle range of motion (ROM) were calculated over the entire task. In addition, pain, physical function, and disability were measured with clinical outcomes: Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (pain and physical function), Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire (disability), and Harris Hip Score (pain, physical function, motion). Physical function performance was measured using 6-Minute Walk Test, Stair Climb Test, and 30s Chair Test. Angle ROMs during the sit-to-stand-to-sit task and clinical outcomes were compared between THA+LF and THA groups using independent t-tests and effect sizes (d).

The difference in hip ROM was approaching statistical significance (p=0.07). Specifically, the THA+LF group had less hip ROM during the sit-to-stand-to-sit task than the THA only group (mean difference=11.17, 95% confidence interval=-1.13 to 23.47), which represented a large effect size (d=0.83). There were no differences in ROM for pelvis (p=0.54, d=0.28) or spinal (p=0.14 to 0.97; d=0.02 to 0.65) angles between groups. The THA+LF group had worse clinical outcomes for all measures of pain, physical function, and disability (p=0.01 to 0.06), representing large effect sizes (d=0.89 to 2.70).

Hip ROM was not greater in the THA+LF group, and thus this is unlikely a risk factor for hip dislocation during this specific sit-to-stand-to-sit task. Other functional tasks that demand greater excursions in the joints should be investigated. Furthermore, the lack of differences in spinal and pelvis ROM were likely due to the task and the THA+LF group had spinal fusions at different levels. Combined THA+LF results in worse clinical outcomes and additional rehabilitation is required for these patients.

Optical motion analysis (MA) is a useful tool for evaluating musculoskeletal function in health and disease. MA is particularly useful in quantifying joint kinematic and kinetic abnormalities accompanying osteoarthritis. However, current practice does not allow the joints of the foot to be measured since the foot is treated as a single rigid segment. To develop a multi-segment kinematic model of the foot for use in a clinical motion analysis laboratory. Apply the model to a healthy population during normal walking and gait intentionally disrupted by a high arch orthotic.

The foot was defined as five rigid segments: hindfoot (calcaneus), midfoot (tarsus), medial forefoot (first metatarsal), lateral forefoot (fifth metatarsal) and the hallux (both phalanges). Each of these segments were tracked individually using custom-built marker triads attached to the skin. Thirty healthy subjects (eleven male, nineteen female; mean age 27.7 years, range 19–53) were examined using MA (eight Eagle camera, EvaRt system, Motion Analysis Corp., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) during normal walking and gait disrupted with a high arch orthotic taped to the plantar surface. All trials were performed barefoot. The special foot marker system was applied to the right foot with the remaining markers in the Helen Hayes configuration. Three motions are reported. The hallux-medial forefoot angulation (HA) is reported in the sagittal plane (plantar-dorsiflexion). The hindfoot-midfoot angulation (HFA) is also reported in the sagittal plane (plantar-dorsiflexion). The height-to-length ratio of the medial-longitudinal arch (MLA) is reported, normalised to zero in quiet standing. Paired t-tests compared the normal and disrupted gait conditions. All angles were compared at the instant of foot flat.

HA was not significantly changed between normal and disrupted conditions: from 8.5° ± 6.4° to 8.6° ± 7.4° (p=0.88). The HFA plantar-flexion significantly increased from 0.5 ° ± 3.3° (normal) to 2.9° ± 4.4° (disrupted; p< 0.01); mean difference = +2.5° (95% CI: 0.81 to 4.1°). The MLA was significantly increased (arch raised) from 0.004 ± 0.018 (normal) to 0.017 ± 0.021 (disrupted; p< 0.01); mean increase = +0.012 (95% CI: 0.00421 to 0.021).

A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot has been successfully implemented in an optical motion analysis laboratory. The model was sensitive to an intentional disruption of normal foot kinematics during walking in a healthy population.

We present our experience with the use of the Anterior Tension Band plate (ATB) following ALIF, which utilises the existing surgical approach obviating the need for posterior fixation. The ATB is a small, smooth, low profile plate. It can be placed through the existing approach (anterolateral retroperitoneal or anterior transperitoneal) across the reconstructed level to prevent extension of the graft space and anterior migration of the spacer. The primary objective of this study is to measure radiographic fusion success in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease using the ATB system. The secondary objective is to accurately define the clinical benefits to the patient.

This is a prospective multi-center outcome study. Each patient was treated with an ATB plate at one or two levels between L2 & S1 and 1 ALIF or FRA allograft spacer per level. Patient data (VAS Pain, SF-12 and Oswestry) was collected preoperatively, and at six, twelve and twenty-four month post-operative intervals. Fusion was evaluated upon demonstration of bridging trabecular bone through or external to the femoral ring. Secondary endpoint success includes demonstration of 15% improvement over baseline on the VAS, Oswestry and SF-12 patient questionnaires.

To date one hundred and thirty-one patients have undergone surgery. There were ninety-two (70%) single-level ALIF procedures and thirty-nine (30%) two-level ALIF procedures. Patients that have returned for twelve month follow-up (n=41) have had a fusion success rate of 81%. The fusion rate among one-level patients is 89% (n=25) and 67% (n=15) among two-level patients. Four of five of the un-fused two-level patients had one level fused but not the other. At twelve months, Oswestry scores improved by an average of 40% with thirty-one of forty-seven (66%) patients achieving success and VAS scores improved by 42% with thirty-five of forty-seven (75%) being successful.

Preliminary analysis of current data shows positive outcomes using the ATB plating system in ALIF procedures. Primary and secondary outcomes are compatible with current standards of care, and device related complications are minimal. Further analysis of outcome data including will be reported upon the completion of the study.