Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 69 - 69
1 Dec 2015
Williams R Kotwal R Roberts-Huntley N Khan W Morgan-Jones R
Full Access

At first-stage revision surgery for infection of total knee arthroplasties, antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers are frequently implanted. Two types of cement spacers are commonly used, “static” and “articulating” cement spacers. Advocates of cement spacers state that they deliver high doses of antibiotics locally, increase patient comfort, allow mobility and provide joint stability. They also minimize contracture of collateral ligaments, thereby facilitating re-implantation of a definitive prosthesis at a later stage. The use of these cement spacers, however, are not without significant complications, including patella tendon injuries.

We describe a series of three patients who sustained patella tendon injuries in infected total knee arthroplasties following the use of a static cement spacer at first-stage knee revision.

The patella tendon injuries resulted in significant compromise to wound healing and knee stability requiring multiple surgeries. The mid-term function was poor with an Oxford score at 24 months ranging from 12–20

Based on our experience, we advise caution in the use of static cement spacer blocks. If they are to be used, we recommend that they should be keyed in the bone to prevent patella tendon injuries.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 6 - 6
1 Mar 2014
Roberts N Bradley B Williams D
Full Access

Electronic PROMs have many potential uses in orthopaedic practice. The primary objective of this three-phase pilot study was to measure uptake using a web-based ePROM system following the introduction of two separate process improvements.

80 consecutive new elective orthopaedic patients in a single surgeon's practice were recruited. Group 1 (n=26) received a reminder letter, Group 2 (n=31) also received a SMS message via mobile or home telephone and Group 3 (n=23) also had access to Tablet Computer in clinic.

Overall 79% of patients had Internet access. 35% of Group 1, 55% of Group 2 and 74% of Group 3 recorded an ePROM score (p=0.02). There was no significant age difference between groups. In Group 3, 94% of patients listed for an operation completed an ePROM score (p=0.006).

Collecting PROM data effectively in everyday clinical practice is challenging. Electronic collection should improve healthcare delivery, but is in its infancy. This pilot study shows that the combination of SMS reminder and access to Tablet Computer within clinic setting enabled 94% of patients listed for an operation to complete a score on a clinical outcomes web-based system. Further process improvements, such as additional staff training and telephone call reminders, may further improve uptake.