We used patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) to evaluate qualitative and societal outcomes of trauma. We collected PROMs data between Sept 2013 and March 2015 for 92 patients with injury severity score (ISS) greater than 9. We enquired regarding return to work, income and socioeconomic status, dignity and satisfaction and the EQ-5D questionnaire.Introduction
Methods
Fractures of the femoral neck occurring outside the capsule of the hip joint are assumed to have an intact blood supply and hence their conventional management is by fixation rather than arthroplasty. The dynamic hip screw and its variants have been used over many years to fix such fractures but have inherent vulnerabilities; they require an intact lateral femoral cortex, confer a relatively long moment arm to the redistribution of body weight and may cause a stress riser due to the plate with which they are fixed to the femur. Intramedullary devices for fixation of proximal femoral fractures have a shorter moment arm, can be distally locked with reduced perforation of the femoral cortex and are believed to be inherently more stable. For these reasons, a number of surgeons believe them to be superior to the DHS for all extracapsular fractures and their use is now widespread. In this study, we present the usage trends of both devices in extracapsular fractures over the last five years and set these results in the context of patient demographics. Our departmental electronic patient management system was used to identify all patients undergoing surgery coded as either DHS or its variants or intramedullary fixation of hip fracture. The patients’ age, sex and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grading were recorded. Comparison between groups was made using appropriate tests in SPSS.Background
Methods
