The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS). All patients included in the ‘ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw’ (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups.Aims
Methods
Since surgical site infections (SSIs) remain among the most common complications of orthopedic (trauma) surgery, there has been unwavering attention for potential predictors of a SSI. Specifically in surgical fields with a high complication rate, such as foot/ankle surgery, risk factor identification is of great importance. Recently, some studies have suggested environmental factors such as season to be of influence on the number of SSI. Specifically patients operated on in the summer are reported to have a higher incidence of SSIs, compared to other seasons. The aim of this study is to identify if “seasonality” is a significant predictor for SSI in a cohort of (trauma) surgical foot and ankle procedures. This retrospective cohort study included all patients undergoing trauma related surgery (fracture fixation, arthrodesis, implant removal and tendon repair) of the lower leg, ankle and foot. Procedures were performed at a single Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands between September 2015 until February 2019. Potential risk factors/ confounders for SSI were identified using univariate analysis (Chi-Square/Mann-Whitney U). Procedures were divided in two groups: 1) performed in summer (June, July or August), 2) not performed in summer (September-May). The number of SSIs was compared between the 2 groups, correcting for confounders, using multivariate regression.Aim
Method
Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included 500 patients from 19 hospitals with a follow-up of 6 months. Eligible were patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants. Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. The intervention was a single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction.Aim
Method
