Due to the success, quantified by both clinical improvement and durability, the number of TKA procedures performed annually has steadily increased since its introduction and it is predicted that approximately 3 million knee arthroplasties will be performed in 2030. Part of this exponential growth is due to indication expansion and TKA is now often performed for younger, more active and heavier patients that historically would have been denied the procedure. Combined with an aging population, often afflicted with comorbidities, it is not surprising that the number of TKA revisions performed annually is also increasing. TKA failure, with subsequent revision surgery, is a costly problem often associated with substantial morbidity. In order to reduce the incidence of TKA failure, it is critical that we expand our knowledge of the issue by asking the question, why are TKAs failing today? Due to a demographically evolving arthroplasty population, the introduction of the new surgical techniques and the routine addition to the market of next generation implants, it is likely that the mechanisms for TKA failure will change over time. It is also possible that there may be regional and even institutional variance when the reasons for TKA failure are investigated. Therefore, it is critical that this question concerning failure mechanisms be repeatedly studied and examined by various study designs in multiple clinical settings.

This lecture will focus on several key aspects of TKA failure: Early (less than 2 to 5 years) vs. late failure; Historically, why did TKAs fail and what has been done to decrease certain failure modes; Why are TKAs failing today?

Only with a comprehensive understanding of TKA failure mechanisms will we be able to properly address this problem and focus our efforts and resources on meaningful solutions. Even incremental improvements that only modestly decrease TKA failure incidence should provide our healthcare system with enormous savings and more importantly, greatly decrease patient morbidity.

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs), identified by MRI, are defined as a region of cancellous bone with high T2 and low T1 signal intensity. They are associated with various knee pathologies including spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SPONK), AVN, trauma (fracture and bone contusion), following arthroscopy and secondary to overuse (i.e., after completing a marathon). They also are commonly recognised in patients with knee OA (referred to as OA-BMLs) and their substantial importance in knee OA pathogenesis has been recently identified. Depending upon the etiology (i.e., bone contusion, overuse, etc.) of the BML, these lesions can be “acute” in nature and spontaneously resolve over time. However, OA-BMLs generally are considered to be a “chronic” condition and overtime they have been shown to often persist and increase in size. Retrieval studies following THA and TKA, in patients with a preoperatively identified BML, have greatly expanded our understanding of OA – BMLs and these investigations consistently identify the critical role subchondral bone plays in OA disease progression. Histologic, histochemical and mechanical studies of OA-BMLs demonstrate significant alternations from healthy subchondral bone. The effected bone contains regions where fibrous tissue has replaced cancellous bone, microfractures are present and vascularity is increased. There is an increased concentration of inflammatory mediators and the bone structural integrity is compromised.

Standard radiographs of the knee correlate only modestly with patient symptoms, but conversely, the presence of an OA-BML is an extremely strong predictor of pain and knee joint dysfunction. Felson et al. reported this relationship. In a large group of patients with painful knee OA, 77.5% of these patients had a BML. Both the presence and size of the BML, following multiregression analysis, were significant predictors of knee pain severity.

Additionally, likely secondary to inadequate subchondral bone plate support, the presence of an OA-BML is associated with subchondral bone attrition (SBA). SBA leads to collapse of the subchondral bone plate and progressive joint deformity.

Based on the association of an OA-BML with pain, joint dysfunction and deformity, it is not surprising that these lesions are prognostic for patients seeking knee arthroplasty. Several studies have demonstrated that the odds of knee arthroplasty performance are substantially higher in patents with an OA-BML.

This enhanced understanding of knee OA pathogenesis and the critical role of subchondral bone in this process creates an opportunity for development of novel prevention and treatment strategies. Prevention of OA-BML formation has been considered and pharmacologic interventions proposed. Recent studies have reported positive results for treatment with bisphosphonates in patients with knee OA. One study reported significant pain and OA-BML size reduction in patients receiving a bisphosphonate for 4 months.

A strategy aimed at repairing and/or enhancing subchondral bone compromised by an OA-BML has also been proposed. Early results reported with this intervention are encouraging, but preliminary.

Introduction

Various 2D and 3D surfaces are available for cementless fixation of acetabular cups. The goal of these surface modifications is to improve fixation between the metallic cups and surrounding bone. Radiographs have historically been used to evaluate the implant-to-bone fixation around the acetabular cups. In general, a well fixed cup shows no gaps or radiolucency around the cup's outer diameter. In post-operative radiographs, the presence of progressive radiolucent zones of 2mm or more around the implant in the three radiographic zones is indicative of aseptic loosening, as described by DeLee and Charnley [1]. In this cadaveric study, we investigated the X-ray image characteristics of two different types of acetabular shell surfaces (2D and 3D) to evaluate the implant-to-bone interface in the two designs.

Serological tests including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are frequently used in the preoperative workup to screen for periprosthetic infection (PPI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The cut-off points reported in the literature are arbitrarily chosen by investigators. Similarly, the values used in laboratories to distinguish elevated results vary from one institute to another. Therefore, we intended to define the appropriate cut-off points of ESR and CRP that can be used to differentiate infection from aseptic failure of THA.

A review of our joint registry database revealed that 515 THA revisions (131 infected cases) were performed during 2000–2005. Intraoperative samples for culture were taken in all cases. The criteria used for diagnosis of infection were a positive intraoperative culture on solid media, presence of an abscess or sinus tract that communicated with the joint, positive preoperative aspiration culture, and/or elevated fluid cell count and neutrophil differential of the aspirated fluid. Non-infected patients with confounding factors that can elevate ESR and CRP including collagen vascular disease, inflammatory arthropathy, malignancy, and urinary tract infection were excluded. Receiver operator curves were used to determine the ideal cut-off point for both ESR and CRP.

The mean value of ESR in the infected group (77mm/ hr) was significantly higher compared to that of the non-infected cohort (29mm/hr) (p=0.0001). Similarly, infected patients presented with a greater mean CRP (9.8 mg/dl) than their non-infected cohort (1.48 mg/ dl) (p=0.0001). The infection threshold for ESR was 45mm/hr with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 79%, while the optimal cut-off value for CRP was defined as 1.6 mg/dl which yielded a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 83%.

The optimal threshold values we determined are higher than the arbitrarily chosen values cited in the literature for ESR (30mm/hr) and CRP (1mg/dl). Although it has been previously reported that the sensitivity and specificity of CRP are far greater than that of ESR, we found that the two tests have comparable diagnostic value.

Currently two-stage resection arthroplasty is the preferred method for surgical treatment of periprosthetic infection in North America. However, the success of this treatment strategy has varied from 54% to 98% based on previous reports. The exact reason for this variation in outcome is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of this treatment modality and delineate patient risk factors that result in recurrent infection and failure.

During the period of this study (2000–2005) 77 patients with an infected THA were treated at our institution. Fifty-four patients underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty while the remaining 22 failed to have the second stage reimplantation due to ill health. The latter 22 were excluded from the analysis. All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years after reimplantation. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty successfully eradicated infection in 36 patients (67%) without need for further treatment. Seven patients (13%) had recurrent infection that necessitated resection arthroplasty. Eleven (20%) patients required irrigation and debridement for postoperative purulent drainage which successfully treated infection in 8 of the cases. The remaining 3 patients failed and required resection arthroplasty. Three additional patients had early loosening of components and required revision arthroplasty. The exact cause of loosening in these patients could not be determined and despite lack of isolation of organisms infection was suspected. Multivariate analysis identified previous medical comorbidity and postoperative allogenic transfusion as risk factors for failure.

Current strategies to treat periprosthetic infection remain imperfect. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty with all its inherent problems and inconveniences imparted a modest success in treatment of PPI at our high volume specialized center. With the increase in the number of virulent and resistant organisms, and the rise in arthroplasties being performed in infirm patients with medical comorbidities the success of this procedure is likely to be jeopardized. Novel treatment modalities to combat this dreaded condition is needed.

Debridement of an infected total joint arthroplasty with retention of mechanically stable components is often performed for acute cases of periprosthetic infection (PPI). However, the reported success of such a procedure to fully eradicate infection has varied widely. The objective of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of debridement in both infected THA and TKA and attempt to identify risk factors responsible for failure.

During the years 2000–2005, 71 TKA and 69 THA underwent irrigation and debridement for acute PPI (< 4 weeks). All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Of the 140 patients, 24% required repeat irrigation and debridement for postoperative drainage, hema-toma formation, or systemic symptoms. One third of these revision debridement patients underwent multiple consecutive debridements. Two-stage resection arthroplasty was required in 65 patients (46%) of the entire cohort. Fifty-eight percent of the patients with resection required revision of their cement spacer block due to continuous drainage and systemic symptoms indicative of persistent infection. We noted a total of 86 failures (61%) that required either an additional debridement or resection arthroplasty after the first debridement procedure. The failure rates of THA (62%) and TKA (55%) individually were similar (p=0.253).

Although the concept of conservative management of PPI with debridement and retention of components is an attractive alternative to resection arthroplasty, we have found that 60% of patients undergoing this procedure will inevitably undergo two-stage arthroplasty. Furthermore, more than half of the patients that required resection arthroplasty developed infection of their spacer that entailed revision of the cement block. Therefore, we can conclude that this procedure has a high failure rate and should be implemented in only a select group of patients.

The differential diagnosis of pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should always include periprosthetic infection (PPI). The current diagnostic tools vary in sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Currently, there is no test with an absolute accuracy for diagnosis of PPI. Furthermore, cost effectiveness of investigations has become an important issue in recent years as increased expenses can place an unnecessary heavy burden on the medical system.

We retrospectively evaluated 296 patients who underwent revision TKA at our institution during 2000–2005 and had preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) performed. The criteria used for diagnosing infection were a positive intraoperative culture on solid media, presence of an abscess or sinus tract that communicated with the joint, positive preoperative aspiration culture, and/or elevated fluid cell count and neutrophil differential of the aspirated fluid. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of ESR and CRP were determined. Combinations were performed in parallel that necessitate both tests to be negative to rule out infection. The cost of each serological test was compared to that of other commonly used screening modalities.

One hundred sixteen patients (39%) were classified as infected and 180 patients (61%) were considered non-infected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the ESR were: 91%, 72%, 68%, and 93%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the CRP were: 94%, 74%, 70%, and 95%. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for the combined studies were 96% and 95% respectively. However, five infected patients (4%) had a normal ESR and CRP. An organism was cultured on solid media in 4 of the 5 cases.

ESR and CRP were the least costly of all the preoperative tests including radionuclide imaging and joint fluid analysis. ESR and CRP are important preoperative tests in the diagnosis of PPI and their ability to clench diagnosis in the majority of cases should not be underestimated. When combined, those simple serological tests have improved sensitivity and negative predictive value to rule out infection.

Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is one of the most devastating complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is widely accepted that resection arthroplasty supplemented with intravenous antibiotics and delayed exchange arthroplasty is the treatment modality of choice for infected TKA. However, the outcome after reimplantation has varied and unpredictable results have been reported. This study evaluates the outcome of this treatment strategy in a single high volume specialised center. Furthermore, our study aims to identify the factors that lead to failure of this treatment.

A thorough review of our joint registry database revealed that 80 patients with an infected TKA underwent resection arthroplasty at our institution during 2000–2005. Sixty-five patients underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty while the remaining 15 failed to have the second stage reimplantation due to ill health or underwent arthrodesis or amputation. The latter 15 were excluded from the analysis. All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty successfully eradicated infection in 45 patients (31%) without need for further treatment. Twelve patients (18%) had recurrent infection that necessitated another resection arthroplasty. Eleven (17%) patients required irrigation and debridement for postoperative purulent drainage which successfully treated infection in 5 cases (46%). The remaining 6 patients failed and required resection arthroplasty. Three additional patients had early loosening of components and required revision arthroplasty. The exact cause of loosening in these patients could not be determined, and despite lack of isolation of organisms infection was suspected. Our analysis identified that irrigation and debridement prior to resection arthroplasty are major risk factors for failure.

Current strategies to treat periprosthetic infection remain imperfect. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty with all its inherent problems and inconveniences imparted a modest success in treatment of PPI at our high volume specialised center. The rise in the number of resistant and virulent organisms, increase in the number of patients with severe medical comorbidities who develop infection may account for the decline in the success of two-stage resection arthroplasty. Novel strategies for treatment of PPI are desperately needed.

Background: Vascular injuries associated with total joint arthroplasty are the most feared complication. The arterial and venous injury can occur due to direct or indirect trauma. A high index of suspicion, recognition of the injury and prompt treatment, with the immediate availability of a vascular surgeon is vital for good outcome.

Methods: Using prospectively collected data on 13624 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at our institution, all incidences of vascular injury were identified. Detailed data regarding the mode of presentation, the type and the outcome of intervention delivered, and the eventual functional outcome of the total joint arthroplasty were determined.

Results: There were a total of 17 vascular injuries (0.1%). Majority (16/17) of these vascular injuries were detected in the postoperative recovery area. 9 injuries occurred after TKA and 8 occurred after THA. Indirect injury was the mechanism in TKA patients with popliteal artery thrombosis being the mechanism. In contrast direct injury was the mechanism in THA patients. Fasciotomy was performed in all TKA patients and none were needed in the THA patients. One patient died of complications related to vascular injury. 12 of 17 patients (70%) had launched a legal suit against the operating surgeon.

Conclusions: After more than 80 years of accumulated experience and more than 35000 joint replacements performed by 5 surgeons in our center, the vascular complication still continues to occur. Patient awareness regarding this real problem may play a role in defraying the extremely high likelihood of legal suits associated with this complication.

Introduction: The potential benefits of Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (MIS THA) continues to be heavily debated. We hypothesized that the potential benefits of MIS THA may relate to factors such as patient selection, patient preconditioning, improvements in anesthesia technique, pain management, and not the incision size. This randomized, prospective study was designed to investigate the role of these confounding factors in general and aggressive rehabilitation in particular on the outcome of THA.

Methods: 100 patients undergoing THA at our institution were randomized into one of four groups. Group A was patients who had standard THA (incision length> 10 cm) and received standard preoperative and postoperative care. Group B patients had THA using small incision (< 10 cm) and standard protocols. Group C patients had regular incision THA, but received aggressive rehabilitation and pain control regimen. Group D patients had THA through small incision and received aggressive regimen.

Results: The demographic distribution amongst all the groups was similar. There was a significant improvement in function as measured by Harris Hip Score, LASA (validated rehabilitation score), SF-36, and lower extremity function test in all groups. The extent of functional improvement, home discharge, patient satisfaction, and analgesia requirement was better in patients who received aggressive preoperative and postoperative care regimen regardless of the size of their incision. There was no difference in estimated blood loss, mean operative time, transfusion needs, and complications between the groups.

Discussion: This study highlights the importance of family education, patient conditioning, pre-emptive analgesia, and aggressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation in influencing the outcome of THA. The aforementioned factors, and perhaps not the surgical technique per se, may play a major role in imparting advantageous outcome to MIS THA that is reported by various investigators.

Purpose: Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is a devastating complication. Surgical intervention to treat PPI is often required. The objective of this prospective study is to determine if there is any difference in functional improvement following revision TKA in patients with infected and non-infected failures.

Methods: 123 consecutive patients undergoing revision TKA at our institution were prospectively recruited into this study. The indication for revision TKA was PPI in 37 cases and aseptic failure in 86 cases. Detailed patient demographics and functional outcome using SF-36, KSS, Womac, lower extremity functional outcome score were collected at base line and at various time points after revision TKA. The baseline and two year follow up functional scores were calculated and compared. The functional score at the time of diagnosis of PPI (prosthesis in place) were used for baseline comparisons

Results: All baseline functional scores, and their individual elements, for the infected cases were worse than the non-infected cases. The functional scores at the two-year follow-up were not different between the infected and non-infected cases. Hence, there was a more impressive improvement (Δ) in functional outcome for the infected cases following revision TKA compared to non-infected cases. However, the general health perception as determined by the patients themselves appeared to deteriorate after revision TKA in both groups.

Discussion: It appears that patients with PPI are markedly more disabled at base line than the non-infected cases. These patients, however, benefit the most from surgical intervention compared to the non-infected cases. It appears that the patients’ perception of improvement in functional scores is less optimistic than physician measured parameters.

Introduction: Intraoperative tissue culture remains the “gold standard” in diagnosing periprosthetic infection (PPI). However, an organism is not always cultured and this has been attributed to the fact that preoperative antibiotics were administered. This study intends to examine if preoperative antibiotics prevent isolation of intraoperative organisms.

Methods: 91 total joint arthroplasty patients diagnosed with PPI during (1999–2005) and who had positive aspiration culture were included in the study. All intravenous antibiotics that were given to the patient within seven days of surgery were documented. The total number of positive intraoperative fluid and tissue samples of patients who did and did not receive antibiotics was calculated. Susceptibility of the organism(s) to antibiotics was determined by antibiogram of the preoperative and intraoperative culture.

Results: 60 out of 91 patients received preoperative antibiotics within seven days of surgery. Antibiotics prevented isolation of an intraoperative organism in 6 out of the 60 (10%) cases. All of the 31 patients who did not receive any preoperative antibiotics had positive intraoperative cultures. Chi-square analysis revealed no significant difference between giving preoperative antibiotics within 7 days and isolating an intraoperative organism (p=0.068). Giving antibiotics that specifically targets the culprit organism did not significantly affect the fluid (p=0.585) or tissue culture yield (p=0.152) either.

Discussion: Although, giving preoperative antibiotics can prevent isolation of intraoperative organisms in 10% of cases, this is not statistically or clinically significant in patients with positive aspiration cultures because the organism is known beforehand. However, it is clinically and medicolegally relevant to withhold antibiotics in patients with negative aspiration cultures since the postoperative treatment antibiotic is tailored according to the organism cultured.

Introduction: Although there is no absolute diagnostic test for PPI, synovial leukocyte counts and neutrophil percentages have been reported to have high sensitivity and specificity making them valuable tests for diagnosis. However, no cut off value for the latter is agreed upon. This study intends to evaluate to define definite cut-off values for preoperative synovial fluid leukocyte count and PMN percentage that allow physicians to diagnose infection in a prosthetic joint.

Methods: We analyzed synovial fluid aspirated preoperatively from 593 total knee arthroplasties (161 infected; 432 aseptic) from three different institutions. Using ROC curves, we determined cut-off values with optimal accuracy in diagnosis of infection for fluid leukocyte count and PMN percentage. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for the above cutoff values.

Results: The synovial fluid leukocyte count was higher in patients with PPI (median, 31 × 103 cell/μl) compared to aseptic joint arthroplasties (median, 0.219 × 103 cells/μl)(p< 0.0001). Similarly, the neutrophil percentage was higher in patients with PPI (median, 90%) than in those with noninfected joints (median, 26%)(p< 0.0001). The cut-off values for optimal accuracy in diagnosis of infection were 1760 cells/μl for fluid leukocyte count and 73% for PMN percentage. A fluid cell count > 1760 cells/μl had a PPV of 99% and NPV of 88%, while a neutrophil percentage > 73% yielded a PPV of 96% and NPV of 91%. Chi-square analysis revealed the fluid WBC count and the neutrophil percentage to be significantly associated with the diagnosis of infection (p< 0.0001).

Discussion: Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential are useful adjuncts to ESR and CRP in the preoperative diagnosis for infection in TKA. This study has identified a cut-off value for leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage that can be used to diagnose infection in a prosthetic joint.

Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a successful procedure. With the demographic tendency towards an elderly society and a relatively high prevalence of arthritis, the number of joint replacement in the US will increase dramatically in the upcoming years. The orthopaedic surgeons need to be aware of the various types of complications in the early hospital setting associated with elective TJA.

Methods: This prospective study reviewed the systemic and local early complications occurring after 13133 TJA which included 7,438 hip arthroplasties (6,010 primary and 1,428 revisions) and 5,695 knee replacements (4,944 primary and 751 revisions). A standardized and detailed form intended to capture all medical and orthopedic complications was devised, plus a full-time research fellow was dedicated to this study. The hospital course of every patient was followed on a daily basis closely. The circumstances leading to the complications and the details of the therapeutic intervention for each complication were recorded.

Results: In general the incidences of complications were higher following TKA compared to THA. There was 26(0.19%) deaths in the cohort that occurred within 10 days after surgery. 329 major (life threatening) complications occurred in the cohort that included myocardial infarction (36), hypotensive crisis (11), pulmonary embolus (145), tachyarrhythmia (93), pulmonary edema (10), acute renal failure (24), stroke (6), bowel obstruction or perforation (3), and pneumothroax (1). There were 37 major local complications. 301 (91%) of these complications occurred within 4 days of index surgery. There were 453 minor systemic complications, mostly related to anemia, and 99 minor local complications in this cohort.

Conclusions: Total joint arthroplasty despite its success can be associated with serious and life threatening complications. The introduction of MIS surgery and the potential for very early discharge of patients undergoing arthroplasty needs to be scrutinized in light of these findings.

Introduction: Management of bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be challenging. The degree and location of bone loss often dictates the type of prosthesis that can be utilized during revision surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to determine if plain radiographs are adequate in assessing the degree of bone loss around TKA and identify the limitations of plain radiographs for this purpose, if any.

Methods: 205 patients undergoing revision TKA at our institution were included. The indication for revision was aseptic failure in 120 patients and septic failure in the remaining patients. The plain radiographs were evaluated by a research fellow and the attending surgeon. The degree and the location of bone loss around the TKA was determined using the UPenn Bone Loss chart. The degree of real bone loss was then determined intraoperatively.

Results: The predicted amount of bone loss for the tibia based on the AP (p=0.136) and lateral (p=0.702) radiographs correlated well with the intraoperative findings. However, plain radio-graphs underestimated the degree of bone loss around femur, particularly the condyles (p=0.005).

Discussion: Reconstructive surgeons performing revision TKA need to be aware of the limitations of routine radiographs in assessing the degree of bone loss around the femoral component. Hence, patients undergoing revision TKA with suspected bone loss may need to be evaluated by additional imaging techniques and/or alternative reconstructive options need to be available to deal with greater than expected degree of bone loss intraoperatively.