Both conservative and operative forms of treatment
have been recommended for patients with a ‘floating shoulder’. We
compared the results of conservative and operative treatment in
25 patients with this injury and investigated the use of the glenopolar
angle (GPA) as an indicator of the functional outcome. A total of
13 patients (ten male and three female; mean age 32.5 years (24.7
to 40.4)) were treated conservatively and 12 patients (ten male
and two female; mean age 33.67 years (24.6 to 42.7)) were treated
operatively by fixation of the clavicular fracture alone. Outcome
was assessed using the Herscovici score, which was also related
to changes in the GPA at one year post-operatively. The mean Herscovici score was significantly better three months
and two years after the injury in the operative group (p <
0.001
and p = 0.003, respectively). There was a negative correlation between
the change in GPA and the Herscovici score at two years follow-up
in both the conservative and operative groups, but neither were
statistically significant
(r = -0.295 and r = -0.19, respectively). There was a significant
difference between the pre- and post-operative GPA in the operative
group (p = 0.017). When compared with conservative treatment, fixation of the clavicle
alone gives better results in the treatment of patients with a floating
shoulder. The GPA changes significantly with fixation of clavicle
alone but there is no significant correlation between the pre-injury
GPA and the final clinical outcome in these patients. Cite this article:
Distal radius fractures are typical and frequent fracture of elderly woman with reduced bone density. Thus implant fixation is more difficult. Dorsal and radial comminution are frequent in these patients and so reduction and angle stable osteosynthesis needed. The angle stable plate, often also multidirectional is today the most common stabilisation device. Because of the introduction of bulky and bended implants as the Micronail or Targon DR wich require difficult opening of the bone with awles we decided to test the XS radius nail witch is a 4,5mm or 3,5mm straight nail and witch is introduced after guide wire placement and over drilling with a canulated drill of the same diameter. It is locked parallel to the joint in 3 different directions with angular stability with threaded wires. Methods 16 radius sawbones were osteotomised corresponding to a A3 Fracture and stabilised with a angle stable plate (8) and XS nail (8). 1000 alternating load cycles from 20–200N were performed and the deformation was registered. Also a FE analysis with the MSC Patran/Marc softwere were performed. Also the calculated deformation in the FE study was 20% lower. Also deformation amplitude was lower with 0.31mm compared to 0.42mm in the plate group. The differences however were not significant. Both devices show good biomechanical results. The XS nail has the advantage of mainly intraosseus position, simple operation technique with introduction over a guide wire from the proc. Styloideus radii and over drilling with a canulated drill of the same size. The exposure of the N rad. superf. must be performed. First clinical evaluation is presented. Due to the results we developed a anatomically adapted XS radius nail. The results of the first 100 patients are presented. Both angular stable plate and XSR nail can be used in unstable distal radius fracture fixation. The mainly intraosseus position of the nail and saving of the pronator quadratus as well as lower deformation are in favour of the XSR nail. However frontal plane fractures and very comminuted fractures are better treated with a multidirectional locking plate due to technical reasones so that we use the XSR nail mainly in A3 and C1 fractures.Conclusions