Previous retrieval studies demonstrate increased tibial baseplate roughness leads to higher polyethylene backside wear in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Micromotion between the polyethylene backside and baseplate is affected by the locking mechanism design and can further increase backside wear. This study's purpose was to examine modern locking mechanisms influence, in the setting of both polished and non-polished tibial baseplates, on backside tibial polyethylene damage and wear. Five TKA models were selected with different tibial baseplate and/or locking mechanism designs. Six retrieval tibial polyethylenes from each TKA model were matched based on time in vivo (TIV), age at TKA revision, BMI, gender, number of times revised, and revision reason. Two observers visually assessed each polyethylene. Primary outcomes were visual damage scores, individual visual damage modes, and linear wear rates determined on micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scan in mm/year. Demographics were compared by one-way ANOVA. Damage scores, damage modes, and linear wear were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparisons test.Purpose
Methods
Previous retrieval studies demonstrate increased tibial baseplate roughness leads to higher polyethylene backside wear in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Micromotion between the polyethylene backside and tibial baseplate is affected by the locking mechanism design and can further increase backside wear. The purpose of this study was to examine modern locking mechanisms, in the setting of both roughened and polished tibial baseplates, on backside tibial polyethylene wear. Five TKA models were selected, all with different tibial baseplate and/or locking mechanism designs. Six retrieval tibial polyethylenes from each TKA model were matched based on time There were no differences among the groups based on TIV (p=0.962), age (p=0.651), BMI (p=0.951), gender, revision number, or reason for revision. There was a significant difference across groups for mean total damage score (p=0.029). The polished tibial design with a partial peripheral capture locking mechanism and anterior constraint demonstrated a significantly lower score compared to one of the roughened tibial designs with a complete peripheral-rim locking mechanism (13.0 vs. 22.1, p=0.018). Otherwise, mean total damage scores were not significant between groups. As far as modes of wear, there were identifiable differences among the groups based on abrasions (p=0.005). The polished design with a tongue-in-groove locking mechanism demonstrated a significantly higher score compared to both groups with roughened tibial baseplates (5.83 vs. 0.83, p=0.024 and 5.83 vs. 0.92, p=0.033). Only the two designs with roughened tibial baseplates demonstrated dimpling (5.67 and 8.67) which was significant when compared against all other groups (p0.99). No other significant differences were identified when examining burnishing, cold flow, scratching, or pitting. No polyethylene components exhibited embedded debris or delamination. Total damage scores were similar between all groups except when comparing one of the polished TKA design to one of the roughened designs. The other TKA model with a roughened tibial baseplate had similar damage scores to the polished designs, likely due to its updated locking mechanism. Dimpling wear patterns were specific for roughened tibial baseplates while abrasive wear patterns were identified in the design with a tongue-in-groove locking mechanism. Our study showed even in the setting of a roughened tibial baseplate, modern locking mechanisms decrease backside wear similar to that of other current generation TKA designs.
