Scoliosis is estimated to occur between 21–64% of patients with cerebral palsy (CP), where a subset of patients develops early onset scoliosis (EOS) before the age of ten. Traditional growth friendly (TGF) surgeries in the context of traditional growing rods have been shown to be effective in treating scoliosis in this population, however significant complication rates are reported. Currently, no studies have been done to examine the effect of novel growth friendly surgeries such as magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) on EOS in CP patients. The objective of this study is to compare MCGR with TGF surgeries in this patient population, specifically by evaluating radiographic measurements and risk of unplanned reoperations (UPRORs).

Patients with EOS secondary to CP were prospectively identified from an international database, with data retrospectively analyzed. Scoliosis (primary curve), maximum kyphosis, T1-S1 and T1-T12 height were measured pre-operation, immediate post-operation, and at two-years follow-up. The risk and etiology of UPRORs were compared between MCGR and TGF. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

Of the 120 patients that met inclusion criteria, 86 received TGF (age 7.5 ± 1.8 years; follow-up 7.0 ± 2.9 years) and 34 received MCGR (age 7.1 ± 2.2 years, follow-up 2.8 ± 0.5 years). Compared to TGF, MCGR resulted in significant improvements in maintenance of scoliosis correction (p=0.04). At final follow-up, UPRORs were 24% for MCGR (8/34 patients) and 43% (37/86 patients) for TGF (p=0.05). To minimize the influence of follow-up period, UPRORs within the first two years post-operation were evaluated: MCGR (21%, 7/34 patients) vs. TGF (14%, 12/86 patients; p=0.37). Within the first two years, etiology of UPROR as a percentage of all patients per group were deep infection (5% TGF, 6% MCGR), implant failure/migration (5% TGF, 9% MCGR), dehiscence (2% TGF, 3% MCGR), and superficial infection (1% TGF, 3% MCGR). The most common etiology of UPROR for TGF was deep infection and implant failure/migration and for MCGR was implant failure/migration.

For patients with CP, at final follow-up, MCGR had superior maintenance of scoliosis correction; however, there was no difference in risk of UPROR within the first two years post-operatively (21% MCGR, 14% TGF).

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCH) are the most common fractures sustained following a fall on an outstretched hand in healthy children, and one of the leading causes of hospital admission and surgical intervention. With increasing severity of injury, treatment options become more invasive and the potential for long lasting complications increases. The aim of this study is to examine the causes and circumstances surrounding SCH in public play spaces particularly to determine whether or not the playground equipment implicated in injurious falls is compliant with Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards.

Children aged 6–12 years who sustained SCH while playing at a public play space between 2017 and 2019 were recruited from the paediatric orthopaedic clinic. Public playgrounds within a 50 km radius of the clinic were visited by research assistants. Using GPS coordinates from photographs taken by the children at the site of injury or play structures identified by the children using Google Maps, play structure type, dimensions, height of fall, and the type and depth of the surface material were collected from each site and compared to the relevant CSA standard.

Of the 89 SCH injuries reported during the recruitment period, 49 (55%) occurred on public play structures. Thirty-nine injury sites, representing 42 SCH cases, were accessible to conduct site visits and were included in the analysis. Thirteen children (31%) sustained Type One, 19 (45%) were Type Two, and 10 (24%) were Type Three SCHs. The mean child age at injury was 7.13 years. Of the 42 SCH cases, 37 sites had woodchips surfacing (88%); three had rubber (7%), one had cement (2%), and one had sand (2%). Of the 36 sites where woodchip depth measurements could be obtained, only seven (19%) met the minimum CSA depth. Out of the 42 SCH cases, 29 injuries (69%) involved upper body equipment (i.e. monkey bars or similar) and track rides. Fourteen of these 29 injuries (48%) occurred on structures that did not meet CSA standards for fall height. All rotating play structures had less than half of the required clearance between the components.

Eighty-six percent of SCH cases occurred in playgrounds where at least one of the required CSA standards was not met. Woodchip surfacing was of particular concern because 81% of woodchip surface depths failed to meet CSA standards. Of the 14 injuries where fall height did not meet CSA standards, 11 (79%) also did not meet minimum CSA surface depth. Field investigation into the characteristics of playgrounds in which children sustain SCH can guide preventative policy and practice measures. Municipalities and school boards should be alerted to the need for regular maintenance of woodchip playground surfacing, in order to remain compliant with the minimum surface depth and prevent serious injuries. Additionally, compliance with minimum surface depths can also decrease fall heights to meet CSA standards. By minimizing the prevalence of SCH injuries occurring on play structures and the need for emergency department visits, the burden to healthcare systems and families of injured children can potentially be reduced.

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCH) are the most common fractures sustained following a fall among children. The majority of these fractures are mild, but the most severe injury types can result in a disruption to the nerves and blood supply resulting in limb threatening injuries and potential life-long disability. Better understanding of mechanisms of injury and child-related factors that influence injury, especially for severe cases, is crucial to identifying best practices and informing policy. We aim to stratify fractures and examine the associated mechanisms and circumstances of injury to identify best practices and inform supportive policy. In doing so, we plan to investigate why some children sustain more severe fractures than others by exploring mechanisms and locations of injury, and risk-taking behaviours.

A prospective, mixed-methods pilot study employing a child-led research design. Our approach links narratives from qualitative photo elicitation interviews (PEI) to mapped images of the locations of injury using geotagged photographs children have taken themselves, complications and injury outcomes, and an assessment of overall risk-taking tendencies.

Participants aged six-12, with the help of their photographs, were able to lay out the events leading up to, including, and following their injury. Much of this information was either not included in their medical charts or was markedly different. Themes included not being able to prevent the injury and being adventurous, as well as becoming more cautious afterwards. These can have applications to the necessity of exploration as well as possibilities to prevent injury or not. Thus, the in-depth, first-person retelling of injury mechanism illustrated the need for mechanistic data and statistics beyond injury location alone. Risk-taking behaviours, as scored by the Sensation Seeking Scale for Children, correlated to injury severity, which is known to be associated with poorer outcomes and long-lasting complications.

PEI of children sustaining SCH fractures in Vancouver reveals mechanisms of injury beyond those previously reported in literature and suggest the feasibility of a large-scale study. PEI in this age group allows for clarifications and a clearer picture of injury mechanism as well as context of injury. These aspects significantly affect our ability to determine the relationship between injury mechanism and injury severity. Mixed-methods analysis of child-directed data as well as quantitative injury demographics reveals unique translational knowledge which can be shared with clinicians, patients/care-givers, community-based health teams, and local policy makers to make timely and impactful improvements in injury prevention, clinical practice, and play structure safety.

The design of every post-surgical knee arthroplasty study begins with the question “How soon after surgery should we assess the patients?”. The consensus, based primarily upon clinical rating systems, is that patients' scores reach a plateau roughly one year after surgery, and that observations performed at that time should be indicative of the long-term behavior of the joint. This is satisfactory for long-term studies of clinical performance. However, when new devices are introduced there is a need to determine as quickly as possible if the device performs as designed. Waiting a year or more after surgery to characterize a device's performance may place additional patients at risk of receiving an inferior design, or may delay widespread availability of a superior design. The goal of this study was to assess knee arthroplasty patients at 6–12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after surgery to determine if their tibiofemoral kinematics changed during functional activities.

A total of 13 patients (7 female) were recruited from an ongoing clinical study to participate in this IRB-approved sub-study. All subjects received fixed-bearing, cemented, posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty of the same design from a single surgeon. Subjects averaged 69 years, 169cm tall, and 28 BMI. Subjects were studied at 6–12 weeks, at 6 months and at 12 months post-surgery, when they showed an average clinical flexion of 106°, 113° and 115°, respectively. Subjects' knees were observed using pulsed-flat-panel-fluoroscopy during three activities: lunging to maximum flexion with their foot placed on a 20cm step, kneeling to maximum flexion on a padded bench, and step-up/down on a 20cm step without progression of the contralateral limb. Model-image registration was used to register 3D geometric models of the implants with their radiographic projections based upon measured projection parameters. 3D knee kinematics were derived from the registered models, including joint angles and the antero-posterior translation of the medial and lateral condyles relative to the tibial baseplate.

There were no statistically significant changes in knee kinematics between the 6–12 week and 6 month, and 6-month and 12-month visits during the kneel and lunge activities (Table 1). Similarly, there were no pair-wise differences in tibial rotation or condylar translation during the dynamic step activity at any flexion angle (Figure 1).

Traditional thinking suggests studies of knee mechanics should be performed at least one year after surgery to make observations that are predictive of long-term joint function. In three different functional activities, we could not demonstrate significant changes in knee kinematics between 6–12 weeks and 6 months, nor between 6 months and 12 months. If these results can be confirmed in a larger subject cohort, and for a range of TKA designs, then functional follow-up studies of novel knee arthroplasty designs might be justified as early as 6–12 weeks after surgery, making it possible to accelerate confirmation devices are performing in patients as designed.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an exceptionally successful and robust treatment for disabling knee disease, but many efforts continue to improve patient postoperative satisfaction and performance. One approach to improving performance is to restore TKA motions closer to those in healthy knees. Based upon an idealized model of knee motions, it is possible to design tibiofemoral articulating surfaces to promote natural kinematics and force transfer (Fiedler et al., Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2011). Such an asymmetric design is expected to promote rollback in stance phase that continues through deeply flexed activities. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) To determine if a TKA designed on a theoretical basis achieves the proposed motions in vivo, and (2) To track postoperative kinematic patterns with examinations at 6–12 weeks, 6 months and one year postoperatively. This paper reports results of the initial cohort that has completed 6–12 week and 6-month examinations.

Eight patients, including 3 females, with unilateral TKA for varus osteoarthritis provided written informed consent prior to beginning the study. Patients averaged 66±9 years, 168±14cm, and 28±3 BMI. Patients performed three weightbearing activities observed using pulsed x-ray flat-panel imaging at 30Hz: stepping up from flexion to extension on a 20cm step, lunging to maximum flexion with the foot placed on a 20 cm step, and kneeling to maximum flexion with the shin placed on a padded support. Three-dimensional knee kinematics were quantified using model-image registration to determine flexion, tibial internal rotation, anteroposterior movement of the femoral condyles (relative to the tibial AP center) and average center of rotation (CoR) in the transverse plane.

During the maximum-flexion lunge and kneeling activities subjects exhibited average knee flexion of 104°–110° and tibial internal rotation of 2°–6° (Table 1). At 6–12 weeks, the medial/lateral condyles were at −3mm/−8mm and −1mm/−6mm during maximum flexion lunge and kneeling, respectively. During the stair activity from 0° to 70° flexion, there were small tibial internal rotations (1°/5°) and anterior medial (2mm/5mm) and lateral (3mm/3mm) condylar translations at both time points (Figure 1). The average CoRs for the stair activity were medial +18% and +5% for the 6–12 week and 6-month exams, respectively.

It has long been assumed knee kinematics change during a patient's first one or two postoperative years. In our early post-op cohort, changes in weight-bearing kinematics over the first 6 postoperative months are small. In maximal flexion activities, patients exhibited flexion similar to similar cohorts studied at least one year post-op (Clin Orthop, 410:131–138, 2003). Similarly, kinematics during the weight-bearing step activity were similar in pattern and magnitude to those previously reported for posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA at least one year post-op (Clin Orthop, 426:187–193, 2004). The average CoRs were medial for the stair activity, which is normal for healthy knees but uncommon for CR TKA. Early post-op results with an asymmetric CR TKA implant intended to promote physiologic motion show flexion and stair kinematics similar to many successful CR designs at longer follow-up. The medial CoR indicates closer-to-physiologic motion than commonly is observed in CR TKA.

To evaluate the efficacy of VEPTR in preventing further progression of scoliosis without impeding spinal growth in the treatment of children with progressive early onset scoliosis (EOS) without rib abnormalities.

Prospective, multi-center, observational cohort study on patients with EOS treated with VEPTR with 2-year follow up. Data were analysed based on measurements done pre-implant, immediate post-op and at 2-yr f/u.

Sixty-three patients met inclusion: 35 males and 28 females. Mean age at time of implantation was 6.1±2.4 yrs. Etiologies included congenital (n=6), neuromuscular (n=36), syndromic (n=4), and idiopathic (n=17). Mean follow up was 2.2±0.4 yrs. Scoliosis (72o±18o) decreased after implant surgery (47o±17o) followed by slight increase at 2-yr f/u (57o±18o), p<0.0001.

At 2-yr f/u, VEPTR was effective in treating EOS without rib abnormalities with 86% of patients having an improvement in scoliosis and 94% of patients having an increased spinal height as compared to pre-operatively. VEPTR provided greater than 100% of expected age-matched spine growth and the instrumented spinal segment continued to grow during distraction phase. This large prospective, multicentre study demonstrated the ability of VEPTER to effectively treat EOS without rib abnormalities. Goals of preventing further scoliosis progression and of maintaining normal spine growth were achieved.

Utilisation of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been limited due in part to high revision rates. Only 8% of knee arthroplasty surgeries completed in England and Wales are UKAs. It is reported that the revision rate at 9 years for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was 3% compared to 12% for UKAs. In the last decade semi active robots have been developed to be used for UKA procedures. These systems allow the surgeon to plan the size and orientation of the tibial and femoral component to match the patient's specific anatomy and to optimise the balancing the soft tissue of the joint. The robotic assistive devices allow the surgeon to execute their plan accurately removing only ‘planned’ bone from the predefined area. This study investigates the accuracy of an imageless navigation system with robotic control for UKA, reporting the errors between the ‘planned’ limb and component alignment with the post-operative limb and component alignment using weight bearing long leg radiographs. We prospectively collected radiographic data on 92 patients who received medial UKA using an imageless robotic assisted device across 4 centres (4 surgeons). This system is CT free, so relies on accurate registration of intra-operative knee kinematic and anatomic landmarks to determine the mechanical and rotational axis systems of the lower limb. The surface of the condylar is based on a virtual model of the knee created intra-operatively by ‘painting’ the surface with the tip of a tracked, calibrated probe. The burring mechanism is robotically controlled to prepare the bone surface and remove the predefined volume of bone. The study shows the 89% of the patients' post-operative alignment recorded by the system was within 30 of the planned coronal mechanical axis alignment. The RMS error was 1.980. The RMS errors between the robotic system's implant plan and the post-operative radiographic implant position was; femoral coronal alignment (FCA) 2.6o, tibial coronal alignment (TCA) 2.9o and tibial slope (TS) 2.9o. In conclusion, the imageless robotic surgical system for UKA accurately prepared the bone surface of the tibia and femur which resulted in low errors when comparing planned and achieved component placement. This resulted in a high level of accuracy in the planned coronal mechanical axis alignment compared to that measured on post-operative radiographs.

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an effective procedure to address patellofemoral instability, however there remains no clear consensus on the optimum technique. Variations in patella tunnel and the use of patella fixation devices are reported in the literature, as are the associated complications of patella fracture and hardware irritation. We present the early results using a two tunnel, Endobutton free technique.

24 MPFL reconstructions (14 female, 10 male) were performed by a single surgeon, using two 3.5mm medial patellar tunnels exiting anteriorly and a looped, extra-synovial hamstring autograft. Femoral fixation was achieved using an non-absorbable interference screw. Mean age was 25.5 years, with a mean follow-up of 21.7 months. Mean Kujala scores were 60.8 preoperatively and 87.9 postoperatively (p<0.0001). No patient experienced further dislocation or patella fracture post-operatively. One patient required interference screw removal.

The surgical technique presented has outcomes comparable with the literature. It requires a shorter tendon graft, and removes the need for a patellar fixation device, reducing potential irritation and cost.

Cement-in-cement femoral component revision is a useful and commonly practised technique. Onerous and hazardous re-shaping of the original cement mantle is required if the new stem does not seat easily. Furthermore, without removing the entirety of the original cement mantle, the freedom to alter anteversion or leg length is difficult to predict preoperatively. We present data from in vitro experiments testing the compatibility of the top cemented stems according to UK registry figures (NJR 2013). This data augments preoperative planning by indicating which revision stems require minimal or no cement reshaping when being inserted into another stem's mantle. We also present the maximum shortening and anteversion that can be achieved without reshaping the original cement mantle.

Little information is available about several important aspects of the treatment of melioidosis osteomyelitis and septic arthritis.

We undertook a retrospective review of 50 patients with these conditions in an attempt to determine the effect of location of the disease, type of surgical intervention and duration of antibiotic treatment on outcome, particularly complications and relapse.

We found that there was a 27.5% risk of osteomyelitis of the adjacent bone in patients with septic arthritis in the lower limb. Patients with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of an adjacent bone were in hospital significantly longer (p = 0.001), needed more operations (p = 0.031) and had a significantly higher rate of complications and re-presentation (p = 0.048).

More than half the patients (61%), most particularly those with multifocal bone and joint involvement, and those with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of an adjacent bone who were treated operatively, needed more visits to theatre.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:277–82.

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is growing in popularity with an increase in utilisation. As a less invasive, bone preserving procedure suitable for knee osteoarthritic patients with intact cruciate ligaments and disease confined to one compartment of the knee joint. The long term survival of a UKA is dependent on many factors, including the accuracy of prosthesis implantation and soft tissue balance. Robotic assisted procedures are generally technically demanding, can increase the operation time and are associated with a learning curve. The learning curve for new technology is likely to be influenced by previous experience with similar technologies, the frequency of use and general experience performing the particular procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the time to achievement of a steady state with regards to surgical time amongst surgeons using a novel hand held robotic device.

This study examined consecutive UKA cases which used a robotic assistive device from five surgeons. The surgeons had each performed at least 15 surgeries each. Two of the surgeons had previous experience with another robotic assistive device for UKA. All of the surgeons had experience with conventional UKA. All of the surgeons have used navigation for other knee procedures within their hospital. The system uses image free navigation with infrared optical tracking with real time feedback. The handheld robotic assistive system for UKA is designed to enable precision of robotics in the hands of the surgeon. The number of surgeries required to reach ‘steady state’ surgical time was calculated as the point in which two consecutive cases were completed within the 95% confidence interval of the surgeon's ‘steady state’ time.

The average surgical time (tracker placement to implant trial acceptance phase) from all surgeons across their first 15 cases was 56.8 minutes (surgical time range: 27–102 minutes). The average improvement was 46 minutes from slowest to quickest surgical times. The ‘cutting’ phase was reported as decreasing on average by 31 minutes. This clearly indicates the presence of a learning curve. The surgeons recorded a significant decrease in their surgical time where the most improvement was in the process of bone cutting (as opposed to landmark registration, condyle mapping and other preliminary or planning steps). There was a trend towards decreasing surgical time as case numbers increase for the group of five surgeons. On average it took 8 procedures (range 5–11) to reach a steady state surgical time. The average steady state surgical time was 50 minutes (range 37–55 minutes).

In conclusion, the average operative time was comparable with clinical cases reported using other robotic assistive devices for UKA. All five surgeons using the novel handheld robotic-assisted orthopaedic system for UKA reported significant improvement in bone preparation and overall operative times within the first 15 cases performed, reaching a steady state in surgical times after a mean of 8 cases. Therefore, this novel handheld device has a similar learning curve to other devices on the market.

Knee osteoarthritis results in pain and functional limitations. In cases where the arthritis is limited to one compartment of the knee joint then a unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is successful, bone preserving option. UKA have been shown to result in superior clinical and functional outcomes compared to TKA patients. However, utilisation of this procedure has been limited due primarily to the high revision rates reported in joint registers. Robotic assisted devices have recently been introduced to the market for use in UKA. They have limited follow up periods but have reported good implant accuracy when compared to the pre-operative planned implant placement.

UKA was completed on 25 cadaver specimens (hip to toe) using an image-free approach with infrared optical navigation system with a hand held robotically assisted cutting tool. Therefore, no CT scan or MRI was required. The surface of the condylar was mapped intra operatively using a probe to record the 3 dimensional surface of the area of the knee joint to be resurfaced. Based on this data the size and orientation of the implant was planned. The user was able to rotate and translate the implant in all three planes. The system also displays the predicted gap balance graph through flexion as well as the predicted contact points on the femoral and tibial component through flexion. The required bone was removed using a bur. The depth of the cut was controlled by the robotically controlled freehand sculpting tool.

Four users (3 consultant orthopaedic surgeon and a post-doctoral research associate) who had been trained on the system prior to the cadaveric study carried out the procedures. The aim of this study was to quantify the differences between the ‘planned’ and ‘achieved’ cuts. A 3D image of the ‘actual’ implant position was overlaid on the ‘planned’ implant image. The errors between the ‘actual’ and the ‘planned’ implant placement were calculated in three planes and the three rotations. The maximum femoral RMS angular error was 2.34°. The maximum femoral RMS translational error across all directions was up to 1.61mm. The maximum tibial RMS angular error was 2.60°. The maximum tibial RMS translational error across all directions was up to 1.67mm.

In conclusion, the results of this cadaver study reported low RMS errors in implant position placement compared to the plan. The results were comparable with those published from clinical studies investigating other robotic orthopaedic devices. Therefore, the freehand sculpting tool was shown to be a reliable tool for cutting bone in UKA and the system allows the surgeon to plan the placement of the implant intra operatively and then execute the plan successfully.

For patients suffering from osteoarthritis confined to one compartment of the knee joint, a successful unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has demonstrated an ability to provide pain relief and restore function while preserving bone and cruciate ligaments that a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would sacrifice. Long-term survival of UKA has traditionally been inconsistent, leading to decreased utilisation in favour of alternative surgical treatment. Robot-assisted UKA has demonstrated an ability to provide more consistent implantation of UKA prosthesis, with the potential to increase long-term survivorship.

This study reports on 65 patients undergoing UKA using an image-free, handheld robotic assistive navigation system. The condylar surface was mapped by the surgeon intra-operatively using a probe to capture a 3-dimensional representation of the area of the knee joint to be replaced. The intra operative planning phase allows the surgeon to determine the size and orientation of the femoral and tibial implant to suit the patients’ anatomy. The plan sets the boundaries of the bone to be removed by the robotic hand piece. The system dynamically adjusts the depth of bone being cut by the bur to achieve the desired result. The planned mechanical axis alignment was compared with the system's post-surgical alignment and to post-operative mechanical axis alignment using long leg, double stance, weight bearing radiographs.

All 65 knees had knee osteoarthritis confined to the medial compartment and UKA procedures were completed using the handheld robotic assistive navigation system. The average age and BMI of the patient group was 63 years (range 45–82 years) and 29 kg/m² (range 21–37 kg/m²) respectively. The average pre-operative deformity was 4.5° (SD 2.9°, Range 0–12° varus). The average post-operative mechanical axis deformity was corrected to 2.1° (range 0–7° varus). The post-operative mechanical axis alignment in the coronal plane measured by the system was within 1° of intra-operative plan in 91% of the cases. 3 out of 6 of the cases where the post-operative alignment was greater than 1° resulted due to an increase in the thickness of the tibia prosthesis implanted. The average difference between the ‘planned’ mechanical axis alignment and the post-operative long leg, weight bearing mechanical axis alignment was 1.8°. The average Oxford Knee Score (old version) pre and post operation was 38 and 24 respectively, showing a clinical and functional improvement in the patient group at 6 weeks post-surgery.

The surgical system allowed the surgeons to precisely plan a UKA and then accurately execute their intra operative plan using a hand held robotically assisted tool. It is accepted that navigation and robotic systems have a system error of about 1° and 1mm. Therefore, this novel device recorded accurate post-operative alignment compared to the ‘planned’ post-operative alignment. The patients in this group have shown clinical and functional improvement in the short term follow up. The importance of precision of component alignments while balancing existing soft-tissue structures in UKA has been documented. Utilisation of robotic-assisted devices may improve the accuracy and long-term survivorship UKA procedure.

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a treatment for osteoarthritis when the disease only affects one compartment of the knee joint. The popularity in UKA grew in the 1980s but due to high revision rates the usage decreased. A high incidence of implant malalignment has been reported when using manual instrumentation. Recent developments include surgical robotics systems with navigation which have the potential to improve the accuracy and precision of UKA.

UKA was carried out using an imageless navigation system – the Navio Precision Freehand Sculpting system (Blue Belt Technologies, Pittsburgh, USA) with a medical Uni Knee Tornier implant (Tornier, Montbonnot Saint Martin, France) on nine fresh frozen cadaveric lower limbs (8 males, 1 females, mean age 71.7 (SD 13.3)). Two users (consultant orthopaedic surgeon and post doctoral research associate) who had been trained on the system prior to the cadaveric study carried out 4 and 5 implants respectively. The aim of this study was to quantify the differences between the planned and achieved cuts.

A 3D image of the ‘actual’ implant position was overlaid on the planned implant image. The errors between the ‘actual’ and the planned implant placement were calculated in three planes and the three rotations. The maximum femoral implant rotational error was 3.7° with a maximum RMS angular error of 2°. The maximum femoral implant translational error was 2.6mm and the RMS translational error across all directions was up to 1.1mm. The maximum tibial implant rotational error was 4.1° with a maximum RMS angular error was 2.6°. The maximum translational error was 2.7mm and the RMS translational error across all directions was up to 2.0mm.

The results were comparable to those reported by other robotic assistive devices on the market for UKA. This technology still needs clinical assessment to confirm these promising results.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been established as a successful procedure for relieving pain and improving function in patients suffering from severe knee osteoarthritis for several decades now. It involves removing bone from both the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and sacrificing one or both of the cruciate ligaments. This in turn is likely to have an impact on the patients' functional outcome. In subjects where only one compartment of the knee joint is affected with osteoarthritis then unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been proposed as an alternative procedure to TKA. This operation preserves the cruciate ligaments and removes bone only from the affected side of the joint. As a result there is the possibility of an improved functional outcome post surgery. UKA has been associated with faster recovery, good functional outcome in terms of range of motion and it is bone sparing compared to TKA. However, the biggest obstacle to UKA success is the high failure rates.

The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of computer navigated TKA (n=60) and UKA (n=42) patients 12 month post operation using flexible electrogoniometry. Flexible electrogoniometry was used to investigate knee joint kinematics during gait, slopes walking, stair negotiation, and when using standard and low chairs. Maximum, minimum and excursion knee joint angles were calculated for each task.

The biomechanical assessment showed statistically significant improvements in the knee kinematics in terms of maximum (p<0.0004) and excursion (p<0.026) knee joint angles in the UKA patient group compared to the navigated TKA group for each of the functional tasks. There was no statistically significant difference between the minimum knee joint angles during these functional tasks (p>0.05).

Therefore, UKA patients were showed to have a significantly better functional outcome in terms of the maximum knee joint angle during daily tasks. A limitation of this study is that it compares two cohorts rather than two randomised groups. It is expected that UKA patients will have a better functional outcome. Our results suggest that for patients with less severe knee osteoarthritis, UKA may offer a better functional outcome than the more common surgical option of TKA. The recent advancements in computer assisted and robotic assisted knee arthroplasty has the possibility to improve the accuracy of UKA and therefore led to the increase in confidence and in usage in a procedure which has the potential to give patients a superior functional outcome.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its perceived benefits over total knee replacements, such as greater bone preservation, reduced operating-room time, better postoperative range of motion and improved gait. However there have been failures associated with UKA caused by misalignment of the implants.

To improve the implant alignment a robotic guidance system called the RIO Robotic Arm has been developed by MAKO Surgical Corp (Ft. Lauderdale, FL). This robotic system provides real-time tactile feedback to the surgeon during bone cutting, designed to give improved accuracy compared to traditional UKA using cutting jigs and other manual instrumentation.

The University of Strathclyde in association with Glasgow Royal Infirmary has undertaken the first independent Randomised Control Trial (RCT) of the MAKO system against the Oxford UKA – a conventional UKA used in the UK. The trial involves 139 patients across the two groups.

At present the outcomes have been evaluated for 30 patients. 14 have received the MAKO unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 16 the Oxford UKA. Both groups were seen 1 year post-operatively. Kinematic data was collected while subjects completed level walking using a Vicon Nexus motion analysis system. Three-dimensional hip, knee and ankle angles were compared between the two arthroplasty groups.

Our initial findings indicate that hip and ankle angles show no significant statistical difference, however there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the knee angles during the stance phase of gait. Data shows higher angles achieved by the MAKO group over the Oxford.

It would appear from our early findings that the MAKO RIO procedure with Restoris implants gives at least comparable functional outcome with the conventional Oxford system and may prove once our full sample is available for analysis to produce better stance phase kinematics with a more active gait pattern than the conventional Oxford procedure.

Further work includes analysing the data obtained from the patients in a number of other activities. These include a full biomechanical analysis of ascending and descending a flight of stairs, sit to stand and a deep knee lunge. The high demand/high flexion tasks in particular may reveal if there's an advantage to using the MAKO procedure over the Oxford. If there is a direct correlation between alignment and patient function then this effect could be more significant in the more demanding patient tasks.

Introduction

While fluoroscopic techniques have been widely utilized to study in vivo kinematic behavior of total knee arthroplasties, determination of the contact forces of large population sizes has proven a challenge to the biomedical engineering community. This investigation utilizes computational modeling to predict these forces and validates these with independent telemetric data for multiple patients, implants, and activities.

Introduction

Electromyography (EMG) is the best known method in obtaining in vivo muscle activation signals during dynamic activities, and this study focuses on comparing the EMG signals of the quadriceps muscles for different TKA designs and normal knees during maximum weight bearing flexion. It is hypothesized that the activation levels will be higher for the TKA groups than the normal group.

This RCT compared electromagnetic (EM) navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of clinical and functional outcomes. 200 patients (navigated=102, conventional=98) were recruited. Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) were recorded pre operation, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Post operative (coronal, sagittal and rotational) alignment was analysed from 3D CT scans taken 3 months after surgery. An objective functional assessment was completed using electrogoniometry on a sub group (navigated=60, conventional=57) at 12 months post surgery.

The EM group showed statistically significantly improved OKS (p=0.04) and AKSS (p=0.03) scores at 3 months post operation. However at 12 months post surgery there was no difference between the two groups. At the 1 year follow up it was reported that 9% of the navigated compared to 14% of the conventional group were dissatisfied with their surgical outcome.

The mechanical axis alignment of 90% of the navigated group was within 3 degrees of neutral compared to 84% of the conventional group. Although all alignment parameters except for tibial rotation was improved in the navigated group they did not reach significance apart from femoral slope alignment (p=0.01).

There was no statistically difference between the surgical groups in terms of the maximum, minimum and excursion knee joint angles during 12 functional activities. Only the knee kinematic function cycles for level walking resulted in statistically significant higher knee joint angles during 55–70% of the gait cycle in the navigated group.

Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical and functional improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. The EM group reported minimal gait improvements. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge.

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of electromagnetic (EM) navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on post operative function.

In this double blinded randomised control trial, patients with osteoarthritis either received TKA using conventional techniques (n = 49) or EM navigation (iNav Portable Navigation System, Zimmer Orthopaedics) (n = 52). All of the patients were reviewed in the Outcomes Clinic at 3 and 12 months. At 12 months post operation the patients completed an objective biomechanical functional assessment using flexible electrogoniometers, which recorded dynamic knee kinematics during daily activities. Knee joint flexion and extension moments were recorded at the 12 month post operation assessment. The functional assessment included validated questionnaires (Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis to assess component alignment.

Improved alignment was recorded in the navigated group. However there was no significantly significant difference between the two surgical groups in terms of the subjective questionnaire scores. The biomechanical assessment showed no statistically significant differences in the maximum, minimum or excursion knee joint angles between the two surgical groups during the 12 daily functional tasks. However, significant differences were reported in level and slope walking activities during pre-swing phase (at around 60% of the gait cycle). The navigated group had significantly higher knee joint angles during pre swing suggesting a more vigorous push off into swing phase and a more ‘normal’ gait cycle. The two surgical groups were sub divided into males and females for the strength test. The female navigated group recorded a significantly greater hamstring (p = 0.03) and quadriceps (p = 0.003) moment. There was no significant difference in hamstring or quadriceps moments between the navigated and conventional male groups.

The knee kinematics and moment data suggests that the navigated group had an improved functional outcome. However the difference in the post-operation function of the two groups remains minimal despite the better alignment achieved using navigation.