Mechanical loading of joints with osteoarthritis (OA) results in pain-related functional impairment, altered joint mechanics and physiological nociceptor interactions leading to an experience of pain. However, the current tools to measure this are largely patient reported subjective impressions of a nociceptive impact. A direct measure of nociception may offer a more objective indicator. Specifically, movement-induced physiological responses to nociception may offer a useful way to monitor knee OA. In this study, we gathered preliminary data on healthy volunteers to analyse whether integrated biomechanical and physiological sensor datasets could display linked and quantifiable information to a nociceptive stimulus.

Following ethical approval, 15 healthy volunteers completed 5 movement and stationary activities in 2 conditions; a control setting and then repeated with an applied quantified thermal pain stimulus to their right knee. An inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an electromyography (EMG) lower body marker set were tested and integrated with ground reaction force (GRF) data collection. Galvanic skin response electrodes for skin temperature and conductivity and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors were manually timestamped to the integrated system.

Pilot data showed EMG, GRF and IMU fluctuations within 0.5 seconds of each other in response to a thermal trigger. Preliminary analysis on the 15 participants tested has shown skin conductance, PPG, EMG, GRFs, joint angles and kinematics with varying increases and fluctuations during the thermal condition in comparison to the control condition.

Preliminary results suggest physiological and biomechanical data outputs can be linked and identified in response to a defined nociceptive stimulus. Study data is currently founded on healthy volunteers as a proof-of-concept. Further exploratory statistical and sensor readout pattern analysis, alongside early and late-stage OA patient data collection, can provide the information for potential development of wearable nociceptive sensors to measure disease progression and treatment effectiveness.

Abstract

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee disorder in active individuals. Movement dysfunction of valgus positioning at the knee during weight-bearing is frequently seen in PFPS. A single-leg squat (SLS) is a test commonly used in physiotherapy to assess for movement dysfunction. Kinesio-Tape (KT) is gaining in popularity in treating PFPS and claims to alter muscle recruitment and motor control, however evidence is weak. Objective: To evaluate the effect of KT applied to the quadriceps on muscle activity with electromyography (EMG) of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis and vastus medialis oblique and motor control via the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) using 2-dimensional video analysis.

A convenience sample of healthy females were recruited and performed 5 single-leg squats with and without KT. EMG of the quadriceps was recorded and dynamic valgus assessed via the FPPA using Dartfish video analysis software. Eccentric and concentric EMG data was recorded and the FPPA measured in single-leg stance and the depth of the squat. Institutional ethical approval was obtained for the study.

16 active females were assessed (mean age 28.94 +6.58 years). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests found no significant change in eccentric or concentric EMG of the quadriceps (%MVC) with KT compared to without (p values 0.35–0.86). Paired-sample t-tests found no significant difference in FPPA between conditions in single-leg stance (p=1.00) or the depth of the squat (p=0.871).

KT did not affect EMG activity of the quadriceps or the FPPA in a SLS when applied to the quadriceps of healthy females, questioning proposed effects of KT on normal muscle tissue. Further research is required into the efficacy of using KT in physiotherapy.

Background

Evidence suggests classification system (CS) guided treatments are more effective than generalized and practice guidelines based treatments for low back pain (LBP) patients. This study evaluated clinicians' and managers' attitudes towards LBP classification and its usefulness in guiding LBP management.

Background

Subjects with Low Back Pain (LBP) often have altered trunk muscle activity and postural sway during perturbations. Research suggests different perturbations have differing results on abdominal muscle activity and postural sway, however, the majority of perturbations investigated are not realistic daily tasks and little evidence exists if the changes are still present following resolution of symptoms. Aim: to determine trunk muscle activity, Lumbar multifidus (M), iliocostalis lumborum (IL), external oblique (EO), transversus abdominus/internal oblique TrA/IO and postural sway during two reaching tasks between subjects with history of LBP (HLBP) and those without.

Movement dysfunction resulting in a knee valgus position during weight bearing activity is associated with increased risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury and Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome especially in young active females. In clinical practice determining the critical knee flexion angle (CKFA) during a single leg squat (SLS) test is used to assess this dysfunction, yet its reliability is unknown. This study aimed to determine rater agreement in determining the presence of knee valgus movement (yes/no) during a SLS test in recreational females (n = 16, age 24.3 ±7.9 yrs, height 165.7±4.8m, mass 62.5±6.4kg) and the intra and inter-rater reliability of measuring CKFA using SiliconCoach™. Three experienced physiotherapists viewed 48 randomised SLS test videos. One physiotherapist repeated the viewing for test-retest analysis. Test-retest agreement for rating SLS test was acceptable (weighted kappa (k) = 0.667). Inter-rater agreement was moderate to substantial (weighted k = 0.284–0.613). Intra-rater reliability of CKFA was acceptable for all three raters (ICC>0.6). Inter-rater absolute reliability was below 5% of the mean CKFA (SEM 4.26 degrees). As previous research reports intra-rater agreement is better than inter-rater agreement when assessing movement dysfunction during functional activity via visual rating. Intra-rater within session and between session reliability for measuring the CKFA using SiliconCoach™ was acceptable and better than inter-rater reliability. Further research is needed to assess the concurrent and construct validity of the protocols used in this study. It is recommended that qualitative research be performed to identify factors that affect physiotherapist's rating of functional activities.

Background

Active therapeutic exercises during unstable and unilateral conditions using body weight for resistance are often used in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). In LBP patient's unilateral atrophy of the spinal muscles is reported. To address these deficits understanding side to side muscle activity using surface Electromyography (SEMG) can help clinicians design exercises that specifically address these deficits. Aim: To identify the effects of unilateral and unstable bridging exercises on trunk muscle activity.

Assessing the efficacy of cervical orthoses in restricting spinal motion has historically proved challenging due to a poor understanding of spinal kinematics and the difficulty in accurately measuring spinal motion. This study is the first to use an 8 camera optoelectronic, passive marker, motion analysis system with a novel marker protocol to compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars. Restriction of cervical spine motion was assessed for physiological and functional range of motion (ROM).

Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were fitted with collars by an approved physiotherapist. ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro-reflective marker clusters attached to the head and trunk. 3-D kinematic data was collected from uncollared and collared subjects during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for physiological ROM and during five activities of daily living (ADLs). ROM in the three clinical planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager (Qualisys, Sweden) 6 Degree of Freedom calculation to determine head orientation relative to the trunk.

For physiological ROM, the Aspen and Philadelphia were more effective at restricting flexion/extension than the Vista (p<0.001), Miami-J (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and Miami-J Advanced (p<0.01 and p<0.05). The Aspen was more effective at restricting rotation compared to the Vista (p<0.001) and Miami-J (p<0.05). The Vista was least effective at restricting lateral bending (p<0.001). Through functional ROM, the Vista was less effective than the Aspen (p<0.001) and other collars (p<0.01) at restricting flexion/extension. The Aspen and Miami-J Advanced were more effective at restricting rotation than the Vista (p<0.01 and p<0.05) and Miami-J (p<0.05). All the collars were comparable when restricting lateral bending.

The Aspen is superior to, and the Aspen Vista inferior to, the other collars at restricting cervical spine motion through physiological ROM. Functional ROM observed during ADLs are less than those observed through physiological ROM. The Aspen Vista is inferior to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ROM. The Aspen collar again performs well, particularly at restricting rotation, but is otherwise comparable to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ranges.

Evidence suggests that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured individuals do not use the same movement strategies as healthy individuals. It is unknown how this may affect them in more challenging activities of daily living and sport. The aim of this study is to evaluate how ACL injured patients perform a single leg squat (SLS) compared to healthy controls. SLS was evaluated as it is more challenging than gait and therefore more relevant to clinical decision making about progressing to sporting maneuvers.

To date, 6 ACL deficient (ACLD) (5 males, 1 female; mass=88±22 kg; height=1.78±0.11 m; age=35±11 years), 5 ACL reconstructed (ACLR) (5 males; mass= 83±12 kg; height=1.74±0.07 m; age=29±10 years) and 5 controls (3 males, 2 females; mass= 72±13 kg; height=1.70±0.09 m; age=30±3 years) performed a SLS on the injured leg for the ACL injured participants and the dominant leg for the control group. Motion analysis was performed using a Vicon Nexus system and a Kistler force platform. Knee extension moments and angles were calculated using Vicon Nexus software.

The ACLD group had reduced peak flexion angles compared to ACLR and control groups (65±5, 77±7 and 82±9 degrees respectively). Peak extension moments were similar across all groups (ACLD= 0.94±0.26 Nm/kg, ACLR=1.06±0.37 Nm/kg, control=1.04±0.36 Nm/kg). Peak knee moments occurred just after peak flexion and therefore at a smaller flexion angle for the ACLD group compared to the ACLR and control group (59±13, 75±7 and 80±6 degrees). Extension moments were similar when evaluated at a consistent angle of 50 degrees (ACLD=0.70±0.30Nm/kg, ACLR=0.63±0.34Nm/kg control=0.61±0.32Nm/kg).

In this sample, the controls squatted deepest followed by the ACLR group, with the ACLD group squatting least deep. This did not translate to an identical pattern for the knee extensor moments. Performance of ACL injured individuals needs to be evaluated on more challenging tasks to fully assess recovery. Further research, with more subjects, will clarify if ACLD individuals are using a strategy to protect their knee or if others factors are preventing them from squatting deeper. This would suggest that these individuals may not have fully recovered and will not be able to perform more challenging activities

Knee injuries in cyclists are often thought to result from an imbalance of load during the cycling motion as a consequence of inappropriate bike set-up. Recently, it has been postulated that incorrect foot positioning may be a significant factor in lower limb injury and poor cycling performance. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of changing the foot position at the shoe-pedal interface on Vastus Medialis (VM) and Vastus Lateralis (VL) activity (mean and mean peak), knee angle and knee displacement.

Maximum power tests were completed on a first visit, with data collection on a second visit recorded at 60% of the subjects maximum. Video footage and surface electromyography (SEMG) from VM and VL muscles was obtained. Data was recorded over 10 crank cycles in 3 experimental conditions; neutral, 10 degrees inversion and 10 degrees eversion using Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) wedges fitted between the cyclists shoe and the shoe cleat. Raw data (mean SEMG, mean peak SEMG) was obtained using Noraxon and SiliconCOACH measured knee angle and knee displacement. Data was analyzed using Friedmans test with appropriate post hoc tests.

12 male subjects (range 26-45, mean 35.9 years) completed the study. Mean and mean peak SEMG data showed no significant differences between the 3 experimental conditions for VM and VL. VM:VL ratios from raw mean SEMG data demonstrated a decrease in synchronicity in inversion and eversion compared to neutral. Pronators demonstrated most synchronicity in inversion and least synchronicity in eversion. There were statistically significant differences in knee angle and knee displacement between neutral, inversion and eversion (p<0.05). Inversion promoted smaller knee valgus angles and greater knee displacement from the bike. Eversion promoted larger knee valgus angles and a smaller displacement from the bike.

By altering the foot position to either 10 degrees inversion or 10 degrees eversion, knee angle and knee displacement can be significantly influenced. Clinically, subjects who foot type is classified as pronating may benefit from some degree of forefoot inversion posting. Further research on subjects with knee pain needs to be undertaken.

Aim

To determine differences in knee valgus angles produced during a single leg squat and hip muscle strength between healthy subjects and patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). To determine correlations between variables of hip muscle strength, knee valgus angle and pain. Study design: Observational study of 20 (8 male 12 female) healthy (H) subjects, matched for age height and weight with 20 (8 male 12 female) PFP patients (mean symptom duration 46.75 weeks). All subjects fulfilled specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Appropriate Ethical approval was obtained. Measures for both groups were Knee valgus angle during a single leg squat using 2D motion capture and SiliconCoach software for measurement of knee valgus angles, hip abduction, internal and external rotation muscle strength using hand held dynamometry, visual analogue scale for pain. Strength was reported as a percentage of body weight. All measures were taken on the affected leg for PFP subjects and matched for the equivalent leg in healthy group. SiliconCoach was determined to be reliable for intra-rater reliability of knee valgus angle (ICC.996).

Aim

To identify differences in hip muscle strength, knee valgus during a single leg squat (SLS),and function between subjects with Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS) and healthy(H) subjects. To determine associations between pain, function, hip strength and SLS in GPTS subjects. Study Design: Observational study of 14 (3 male 11 female) PFP patients (mean symptom duration 17 months), matched for age height and weight with 14 healthy (H) subjects, All subjects fulfilled specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Appropriate Ethical approval was obtained. Measures for both groups were Knee valgus angle during SLS using 2D motion capture and SiliconCoach software for measurement of knee valgus angles, hip abduction, internal and external rotation muscle strength using hand held dynamometry, visual analogue scale for pain. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). All measures were taken on the affected leg for GPTS subjects and matched for the equivalent leg in healthy group. Strength was reported as a percentage of body weight. SiliconCoach was reliable for intra-rater reliability of knee valgus angle (ICC.996).