Statement of purpose

We review the current state of development of proton therapy and the implications for beam therapy in the management of primary bone tumours

Study Design: A retrospective review of case notes and histology reports.

Summary of Background Data: Up to 8% of cancer patients develop second malignancies. The vertebral column is frequently involved in metastatic disease and may represent the first manifestation of malignancy in up to 40% of patients. The rate of vertebral metastasis from a second tumour in patients with a known primary is not well known.

Objective: We sought to identify the incidence of a second primary in patients referred to our unit with spinal malignancy and a previously diagnosed primary tumour.

Subjects: 222 patients underwent definitive surgery for spinal metastatic disease of whom 135 had a prior history of malignancy.

Outcome measures: Histological tissue of origin of spinal metastasis in light of previous known malignancy.

Results: In 16 patients (11.9%) the vertebral histology differed from the initial primary. The period between first and second malignancies varied widely (19 months – 22 years). Thirteen patients (9.6%) had identifiable tissue origins for the metastasis that was not in keeping with the previous malignancy. Three further patients showed sufficient histological and imunohistochemical differences such that a further tumour of unknown origin and not de-differentiation of the previous tumour was suspected. Three previously unrecognised tumours were diagnosed on biopsy and eight on tissue obtained at definitive surgery.

Conclusion: The incidence of second primaries, in particular myeloma, presenting with vertebral metastases is significant and should always be borne in mind when assessing patients and planning treatment. Biopsy should be performed when possible. Comparison needs to be made between the histological features of the previous primary and metastasis.

Objective To describe the initial clinical and radiological results of a minimally invasive technique of lumbar fusion

Study Design Prospective review of 16 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent a mini posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the operating microscope and B- twin expandable cages and titanium facet screws and facet fusion .

Subjects 16 patients with degenerative lumbar disease, average age 41(33–48) 5 male 11 female. This was the primary procedure in 11 patients , 5 had previously had a microdiscectomy . 14 patients L5/S1 level 2 patients 2 level L4/L5 L5/S1

Outcome Measures Oswestry disability index and VAS of back and leg pain were perfomed pre-operatively and at 3/12, 6/12, 12/12 Average follow up was 8.1 months (3–17).

Results 1 patient had persistent bone graft donor site pain ,no other complications. Preoperative mean ODI 55 (40–76) Post operative ODI 33 (2–64) Pre op back pain 7.1 (0–8) post op at last follow up 3.7(0–6) Pre op leg 3.9 (0–8) 1.6(0–5) All patients who had reached 12 months follow up had evidence of bone formation at the level in question. All patients improved in terms back pain and leg pain scores and all but 1 patient had a significantly improved ODI score.

Conclusions This has proved to be a safe method of achieving a 360degree stabilisation and probable fusion. It maximally preserves the paraspinal muscles and their innervation in contrast to posterolateral fusion and conventional PLIF using pedicle screws .The small diameter of the implant prior to expansion minimises the degree of neural retraction required .

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the indications for spinal instrumentation, report the clinical features, operative details and outcome in 16 patients with active pyogenic spinal infection.

Between January 1991 to October 1999, 81 patients with spontaneous pyogenic spinal infection were treated at the authors’ institution. Surgery (other than biopsy) was indicated in 24 patients for neurological deterioration, deformity or instability. Sixteen of these patients were treated with instrumentation in the presence of active spinal infection. Six patients underwent combined anterior and posterior procedures. 10 had a posterior procedure only. Outcomes assessed were control of infection, neurology, fusion, back pain and complications.

At a mean follow up period of 26. 9 months, all surviving patients were free of clinical infection. None of the patients had neurological deterioration. All patients who had neurological deficit preoperatively improved by at least one Frankel grade. A solid fusion was achieved in 15 patients. 12/15 patients remained asymptomatic or had very little pain. The remaining 3 patients had mild to moderate back pain. The mean correction of the kyphotic deformity was 18. 92 degrees. Postoperative complications included bronchopneumonia, nonfatal pulmonary embolism and seizures in 3 patients. One patient developed progressive kyphosis despite instrumentation but eventually fused in kyphus.

Given early recognition of pyogenic spinal infection, most cases can be managed non-operatively. Our results support that instrumented fusion with or without decompression may be used safely when indicated without the risk of recurrence of infection. Instrumentation facilitates nursing care and allows early mobilisation. For biomechanical reasons, a combined procedure is probably indicated for lesions above the conus. For lesions below the conus, we were able to achieve successful results with posterior approach only.

Objective: To assess the validity of the Tokuhashi and Tomita scoring systems in the prediction of prognosis following spinal surgery for skeletal metastases.

Design: A retrospective cohort study of patients treated in a specialist spinal unit

Subjects: All patients undergoing definitive surgery for metastastes of the spine were considered eligible. Time to death or current length of survival was available in 147* of these which was confirmed by the Cancer Registry. Medical and nursing case notes were reviewed and prognostic scores using the methods of Tokuhashi et al, and Tomita et al. were calculated for each patient.

*

death data for further patients currently awaited from Cancer Registry.

Outcome measures: Mean survival period with 95% confidence intervals for patients grouped according to prognostic score.

Results: Thirty-two patients were still alive and 113 had confirmed death dates. Forty-three patients had Tokuhashi scores of 9 or greater with a mean survival of 20.1 months (95% confidence interval 5.8 months) compared to 9.5 months (2.9 months) for scores 6–8 and 3.5 months (1.8 months) for scores below this. Tomita scoring showed a similar trend with those with better prognostic profiles but without the same degree of statistical significance. The overall 30-day mortality was 8.2% with no significant difference between any other groups.

Conclusion: In patients presenting with metastatic disease involving the spine, published prognostic profiles offer some guidance to likely survival of the patient and so the appropriateness of surgical treatment.

Objective: To compare the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of spinal tuberculosis in two cities, one in the UK, and one in Malaysia

Design: Retrospective comparison over a five-year period from June 1995. The Centres studied were the Royal Orthopaedic and Queen Elizabeth Hospitals, Birmingham (UK), and the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital (KL), Malaysia.

Subjects: There were 80 patients (29 females, mean age 42) in the KL group, and 19 patients (8 females, mean age 45) in the UK group.

Outcome measures: Frankel grading before and after treatment were measured for both groups.

Results: KL patients had higher rates of immunocompromise, and had fewer spinal levels involved, 2.1 compared with 2.6 (p-−0.04). There were 65 procedures, 58 positive ZN stains, and 65 positive cultures as compared with 24, 2 and 9 in Birmingham respectively. Improvement in Frankel grading was seen in four patients in UK (5 grades), and in 17 patients in KL (29 grades).

Conclusions: Although the two groups exhibited similar demographics, the rate of immunocompromise-related tuberculosis, severity of neurological deficit, and type of surgery undertaken differed significantly. Reasons for the difficulty in identifying the tubercle bacillus in Birmingham are discussed.