There is renewed interest in bi-unicondylar arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) for patients with medial and lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, but a spared patellofemoral compartment and functional cruciate ligaments. The bone island between the two tibial components may be at risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture, compromising function. This finite element analysis compared intraoperative tibial strains for Bi-UKA to isolated medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA-M) to assess the risk of avulsion. A validated model of a large, high bone-quality tibia was prepared for both UKA-M and Bi-UKA. Load totalling 450N was distributed between the two ACL bundles, implant components and collateral ligaments based on experimental and intraoperative measurements with the knee extended and appropriately sized bearings used. 95th percentile maximum principal elastic strain was predicted in the proximal tibia. The effect of overcuts/positioning for the medial implant were studied; the magnitude of these variations was double the standard deviation associated with conventional technique.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA) are successful treatments for osteoarthritis, but monolithic implants disrupt the natural homeostasis of bone which leads to bone loss over time. This can cause problems if the implant needs to be revised. This study aimed to demonstrate that tibial implants made from titanium lattice could replace the tibial condyle surface while minimising disruption of the bone's natural mechanical loading environment. A secondary aim was to determine whether implants perform better if they replicate more closely bone's mechanical modulus, anisotropy and spatial heterogeneity. This study was conducted in a human cadaveric model. In a cadaveric model, UKA and TKA procedures were performed on 8 fresh-frozen knee specimens by a board-certified consultant orthopaedic surgeon, using tibial implants made from conventional monolithic material and titanium lattice structures. Stress at the bone-implant interfaces was measured with pressure film and compared to the native knee.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
