Previous studies comparing cruciate retaining (CR) and cruciate sacrificing - posterior stabilised (PS) TKRs have failed to demonstrate a difference in outcomes based on numbers of patients recruited. This large study compares clinical outcomes in groups having PS and CR TKR and reports the results at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. A total of 683 patients undergoing TKR were consecutively enrolled in a prospective multi-centre study with 2 arms. In the first arm patients receiving a PS component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (176 patients) or fixed bearing (176 patients) implant. In the second arm, patients receiving a CR component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (161 patients) or fixed bearing (170 patients) implant. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patellar Score) by independent nurse specialists. The data from the 2 arms of the trial were then analysed to compare differences between PS and CR implants.Introduction
Methods
The aim of the study was to assess the impact of a self aligning unidirectional mobile tibial bearing and the use of a patella button on lateral patella release rates within a knee system using a common femoral component for both the fixed and mobile variants. A total of 347 patients undergoing TKR were included in the study and randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (171 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) PS PFC Sigma TKR. Further sub-randomisation into patella resurfacing or retention was performed for both designs. The need for lateral patella release was assessed during surgery using the ‘no thumbs’ technique. The lateral release rate was similar for fixed bearing (9.65%) and mobile bearing (9.94%) implants (p=0.963). Patella resurfacing resulted in lower lateral release rates when compared to patella retention (5.8% vs 13.8%; p=0.0131). This difference was most marked in the mobile bearing group where the lateral release rate was 16.3% with patella retention compared to 3.5% with patella resurfacing (p=0.005).Aim
Methods and results
It is hypothesised that cruciate retention in total knee arthroplasty may result in improved kinematics of the knee by maintaining the femoral rollback seen in the normal knee, resulting in improved function. This study compares clinical outcomes in groups having PS and CR total knee arthroplasty and report the results at 1 and 2 years post-operatively.
Patients with a PS also showed a greater improvement in the AKSS knee score at 1 (p=0.0001) and 2 (p=0.001) years. Knee flexion improvement was also greater in the PS group at 1 (p=0<
0.0001) and 2 (p=0.0035) years. PS knees also achieved better outcomes in these variables in the mobile and fixed subgroups. There were no other significant differences in the scores between the two groups at any stage.
We used a high frequency response, ultra-thin transducer to measure forefoot pressures at predetermined sites on the sole of the foot in 10 normal subjects. We demonstrated impact pressure peaks, which have not previously been identified, and which were separate from the roll-off peak. We report preliminary results on the effect of various forms of footwear and insoles on sub-pedal pressure during walking.
A manufacturing technique to increase the bonding between bone cement and metal prostheses has been assessed in the laboratory by "push-out" tests, and the effects of contamination of the cement and of the prosthesis with blood and intramedullary contents have been studied. The technique, known as pre-coating, increases bond strength; this increase is preserved after contamination of the cement which does, however, cause some lowering of interface shear strength. The implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Seventy-two symptomatic knees were studied in 68 patients between 2 and 17 years of age. A firm clinical diagnosis was made in all knees before arthroscopy. The clinical diagnosis and the arthroscopic findings were compared to establish the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis. This was 42% in children under 13 years old (Group 1) and 55% in children between 14 and 17 (Group 2). Possible unnecessary arthrotomy was avoided in 58% of the knees in Group 1, and 31% of the knees in Group 2. The most common "incorrect" clinical diagnosis in Group 1 was that of a discoid lateral meniscus followed by a torn medial or torn lateral meniscus in that order. The most common "incorrect" diagnosis in Group 2 was a torn medial meniscus followed by a discoid lateral meniscus. It is considered that children presenting with knee symptoms should be managed by orthopaedic surgeons who are experienced in arthroscopic diagnosis.