Purpose: Distal radius fractures are common and rising in incidence as orthopaedists treat an increasingly aged population. Both external fixation and volar plating have demonstrated satisfactory results, however the orthopaedic literature lacks comparative data on radial column plating. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare functional and radiographic data from patients randomized to three surgical modalities – external fixation, volar plating, and radial column plating.

Method: This study included 40 patients with closed, unilateral, unstable distal radius fractures distributed as follows: 20 patients treated with external fixation, 10 patients with volar plating, and 10 patients with radial column plating. When classified according to the OTA system, the fractures included types A3, B3, and C1 C3. Patients were followed post-operatively at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. At each visit, patients completed a DASH questionnaire, grip and lateral pinch strength, and range of motion for both wrists. Radiographs were evaluated for lateral tilt, radial inclination, ulnar variance and radial height. Statistical analyses employed single-factor three-way ANOVA of all outcomes at each follow-up period.

Results: No significant difference (p> 0.05) was found between mean DASH scores at each follow-up period for all three patient groups. However, each group achieved significant improvement in DASH scores at 1-year follow-up compared to baseline scores (external fixation, p0.05), with final flexion-extension and supination-pronation ranging 78–94% and 92–96% (of the un-injured wrist), respectively. All radiographic measurements demonstrated no significant differences. Reduction was maintained among all three groups without implant failure or complications.

Conclusion: At all follow-up periods, analysis of functional and radiographic outcomes showed no significant difference among all groups. Based on this data, no one method of fixation is superior to the others, giving orthopaedists multiple options for surgically reducing the unstable distal radius. Moreover, the diversity in approach of these methods allows additional flexibility in selecting an appropriate technique for each patient.

Introduction and Aims: The volar carpal ganglion (VCG) is a common benign tumor of the hand complicated by multiple recurrences with conventional treatment. Despite being a common condition, we know of no report describing post-operative functional outcome. We evaluated functional outcome, pain, scarring, and recurrence after VCG excision in the last 15 years.

Method: Twenty-eight patients were considered for inclusion in this study. All patients had been surgically treated for volar carpal ganglia in the last 15 years. Of these, 16 were available for follow-up after exclusion of patients who had since deceased, moved, or were otherwise lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 55 months (nine–135 months). Functional outcome of the upper extremity was evaluated using the standard DASH questionnaire. DASH scores can range from zero (no difficulty in performing daily tasks) to 100 (unable to perform daily tasks). Pain, scarring, and recurrence were also assessed.

Results: Sixteen patients who underwent surgical excision of their recurrent volar carpal ganglions were available for follow-up at the time of the study. They included six men and 10 women, with a mean age of 47 (range 11–70 years). The duration of symptoms prior to excision ranged from two to 50 months. Pain was the main reason for surgery while one patient reported that surgery was performed for cosmetic reasons. There were eight patients in the nine-month to three-year follow-up period and the average DASH score was 7.6. The four patients in the three to five-year follow-up period had an average DASH of 8.1. The four patients in the five plus years of follow-up had an average DASH of 1.7. The improvement in functional outcome correlated with time since surgery, however these differences were not statistically significant. Two of the 16 patients had recurrences within six months after excision. Increased pain was reported in these patients only. No patients complained of significant scarring post-operatively.

Conclusion: Multiple treatment modalities including aspiration and surgery are discussed in the literature with great outcome variability. Our series is the first long-term functional assessment after VCG excision. Thus, surgery is an option for treatment of this common condition as evidenced by low recurrence and DASH scores and high patient satisfaction.